From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
1vier1@web.de, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] barrier.h: Move smp_mb__after_unlock_lock to barrier.h
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 13:56:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1472385376-8801-3-git-send-email-manfred@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1472385376-8801-2-git-send-email-manfred@colorfullife.com>
spin_unlock() + spin_lock() together do not form a full memory barrier:
a=1;
spin_unlock(&b);
spin_lock(&c);
+ smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
d=1;
Without the smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(), other CPUs can observe the
write to d without seeing the write to a.
Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
---
include/asm-generic/barrier.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
kernel/rcu/tree.h | 12 ------------
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
index fe297b5..9b4d28f 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
@@ -244,6 +244,22 @@ do { \
smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep(); \
VAL; \
})
+
+#ifndef smp_mb__after_unlock_lock
+/*
+ * Place this after a lock-acquisition primitive to guarantee that
+ * an UNLOCK+LOCK pair act as a full barrier. This guarantee applies
+ * if the UNLOCK and LOCK are executed by the same CPU or if the
+ * UNLOCK and LOCK operate on the same lock variable.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC
+#define smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() smp_mb() /* Full ordering for lock. */
+#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PPC */
+#define smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() do { } while (0)
+#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PPC */
+
+#endif
+
#endif
#endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index e99a523..a0cd9ab 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -687,18 +687,6 @@ static inline void rcu_nocb_q_lengths(struct rcu_data *rdp, long *ql, long *qll)
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TRACE */
/*
- * Place this after a lock-acquisition primitive to guarantee that
- * an UNLOCK+LOCK pair act as a full barrier. This guarantee applies
- * if the UNLOCK and LOCK are executed by the same CPU or if the
- * UNLOCK and LOCK operate on the same lock variable.
- */
-#ifdef CONFIG_PPC
-#define smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() smp_mb() /* Full ordering for lock. */
-#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PPC */
-#define smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() do { } while (0)
-#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PPC */
-
-/*
* Wrappers for the rcu_node::lock acquire and release.
*
* Because the rcu_nodes form a tree, the tree traversal locking will observe
--
2.5.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-28 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-28 11:56 [PATCH 0/4] Clarify/standardize memory barriers for lock/unlock Manfred Spraul
2016-08-28 11:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] spinlock: Document memory barrier rules Manfred Spraul
2016-08-28 11:56 ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
2016-08-28 11:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core: update memory barriers Manfred Spraul
2016-08-28 11:56 ` [PATCH 4/4] qspinlock for x86: smp_mb__after_spin_lock() is free Manfred Spraul
2016-08-29 10:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-29 10:51 ` [PATCH 3/4] net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core: update memory barriers Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-28 13:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] barrier.h: Move smp_mb__after_unlock_lock to barrier.h Paul E. McKenney
2016-08-28 16:31 ` Manfred Spraul
2016-08-28 18:00 ` Manfred Spraul
2016-08-28 14:41 ` kbuild test robot
2016-08-28 17:43 ` [PATCH 2/4 v3] spinlock.h: Move smp_mb__after_unlock_lock to spinlock.h Manfred Spraul
2016-08-29 10:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] spinlock: Document memory barrier rules Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-29 12:54 ` Manfred Spraul
2016-08-29 13:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-31 4:59 ` Manfred Spraul
2016-08-31 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-31 16:40 ` Will Deacon
2016-08-31 18:32 ` Manfred Spraul
2016-09-01 8:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-01 11:04 ` Manfred Spraul
2016-09-01 11:19 ` Will Deacon
2016-09-01 11:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-01 14:05 ` Boqun Feng
2016-08-29 10:53 ` [PATCH 0/4] Clarify/standardize memory barriers for lock/unlock Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1472385376-8801-3-git-send-email-manfred@colorfullife.com \
--to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=1vier1@web.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®