mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	1vier1@web.de, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core: update memory barriers.
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 13:56:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1472385376-8801-4-git-send-email-manfred@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1472385376-8801-3-git-send-email-manfred@colorfullife.com>

Change the locking for nf_conntrack_lock and nf_conntract_lock_all()
to the approach used by ipc/sem.c:

- use smp_store_mb() instead of a raw smp_mb()
- use smp_mb__after_spin_lock().
- for nf_conntrack_lock, use spin_lock(&global_lock) instead of
  spin_unlock_wait(&global_lock) and loop backward.

The last change avoids that nf_conntrack_lock() could loop multiple times.

Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index dd2c43a..ded1adc 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -80,20 +80,29 @@ static __read_mostly bool nf_conntrack_locks_all;
 
 void nf_conntrack_lock(spinlock_t *lock) __acquires(lock)
 {
+	/* Step 1: Acquire the lock */
 	spin_lock(lock);
-	while (unlikely(nf_conntrack_locks_all)) {
-		spin_unlock(lock);
 
-		/*
-		 * Order the 'nf_conntrack_locks_all' load vs. the
-		 * spin_unlock_wait() loads below, to ensure
-		 * that 'nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock' is indeed held:
-		 */
-		smp_rmb(); /* spin_lock(&nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock) */
-		spin_unlock_wait(&nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock);
-		spin_lock(lock);
-	}
+	/* Step 2: make it visible to all CPUs that we hold the lock */
+	smp_mb__after_spin_lock();
+
+	/* Step 3: read locks_all, with ACQUIRE semantics */
+	if (likely(smp_load_acquire(&nf_conntrack_locks_all) == false))
+		return;
+
+	/* slow path: unlock */
+	spin_unlock(lock);
+
+	/* Slow path, step 1: get global lock */
+	spin_lock(&nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock);
+
+	/* Slow path, step 2: get the lock we want */
+	spin_lock(lock);
+
+	/* Slow path, step 3: release the global lock */
+	spin_unlock(&nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock);
 }
+
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_conntrack_lock);
 
 static void nf_conntrack_double_unlock(unsigned int h1, unsigned int h2)
@@ -133,15 +142,14 @@ static void nf_conntrack_all_lock(void)
 	int i;
 
 	spin_lock(&nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock);
-	nf_conntrack_locks_all = true;
 
 	/*
-	 * Order the above store of 'nf_conntrack_locks_all' against
+	 * Order the store of 'nf_conntrack_locks_all' against
 	 * the spin_unlock_wait() loads below, such that if
 	 * nf_conntrack_lock() observes 'nf_conntrack_locks_all'
 	 * we must observe nf_conntrack_locks[] held:
 	 */
-	smp_mb(); /* spin_lock(&nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock) */
+	smp_store_mb(nf_conntrack_locks_all, true);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < CONNTRACK_LOCKS; i++) {
 		spin_unlock_wait(&nf_conntrack_locks[i]);
-- 
2.5.5

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-28 11:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-28 11:56 [PATCH 0/4] Clarify/standardize memory barriers for lock/unlock Manfred Spraul
2016-08-28 11:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] spinlock: Document memory barrier rules Manfred Spraul
2016-08-28 11:56   ` [PATCH 2/4] barrier.h: Move smp_mb__after_unlock_lock to barrier.h Manfred Spraul
2016-08-28 11:56     ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
2016-08-28 11:56       ` [PATCH 4/4] qspinlock for x86: smp_mb__after_spin_lock() is free Manfred Spraul
2016-08-29 10:52         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-29 10:51       ` [PATCH 3/4] net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core: update memory barriers Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-28 13:43     ` [PATCH 2/4] barrier.h: Move smp_mb__after_unlock_lock to barrier.h Paul E. McKenney
2016-08-28 16:31       ` Manfred Spraul
2016-08-28 18:00       ` Manfred Spraul
2016-08-28 14:41     ` kbuild test robot
2016-08-28 17:43       ` [PATCH 2/4 v3] spinlock.h: Move smp_mb__after_unlock_lock to spinlock.h Manfred Spraul
2016-08-29 10:48   ` [PATCH 1/4] spinlock: Document memory barrier rules Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-29 12:54     ` Manfred Spraul
2016-08-29 13:44       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-31  4:59         ` Manfred Spraul
2016-08-31 15:40           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-31 16:40             ` Will Deacon
2016-08-31 18:32               ` Manfred Spraul
2016-09-01  8:44                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-01 11:04                   ` Manfred Spraul
2016-09-01 11:19                     ` Will Deacon
2016-09-01 11:51                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-01 14:05                       ` Boqun Feng
2016-08-29 10:53 ` [PATCH 0/4] Clarify/standardize memory barriers for lock/unlock Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1472385376-8801-4-git-send-email-manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=1vier1@web.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®