From: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
To: <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>, <ohad@wizery.com>, <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: <loic.pallardy@st.com>, <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel@stlinux.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 15/20] remoteproc: core: Append resource only if .resource_table section is large enough
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:00:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1476288038-24909-16-git-send-email-loic.pallardy@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476288038-24909-1-git-send-email-loic.pallardy@st.com>
To guarantee remoteproc won't overwrite firmware data when copying
back modified resource table, rproc_add_resource_table_entry verifies
first that .resource_table elf section is large enough to support new
resource appending.
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
---
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 3847fd4..f4a02f0 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1057,39 +1057,73 @@ static int rproc_update_resource_table_entry(struct rproc *rproc,
return !updated;
}
-static struct resource_table*
-rproc_add_resource_table_entry(struct rproc *rproc,
+static int rproc_add_resource_table_entry(struct rproc *rproc,
struct rproc_request_resource *request,
- struct resource_table *old_table, int *tablesz)
+ struct resource_table *table, int tablesz)
{
- struct resource_table *table;
- struct fw_rsc_hdr h;
+ struct fw_rsc_hdr *hdr, h;
void *new_rsc_loc;
void *fw_header_loc;
void *start_of_rscs;
int new_rsc_offset;
- int size = *tablesz;
- int i;
+ struct fw_rsc_vdev *v;
+ int i, spare_len = 0, size;
+ unsigned int min_offset, max_offset = 0;
+
h.type = request->type;
- new_rsc_offset = size;
+ /* Check available spare size to integrate new resource */
+ for (i = 0; i < table->num; i++)
+ max_offset = max(max_offset, table->offset[i]);
+
+ hdr = (void *)table + max_offset;
+
+ switch (hdr->type) {
+ case RSC_CARVEOUT:
+ size = sizeof(struct fw_rsc_carveout);
+ break;
+ case RSC_DEVMEM:
+ size = sizeof(struct fw_rsc_devmem);
+ break;
+ case RSC_TRACE:
+ size = sizeof(struct fw_rsc_trace);
+ break;
+ case RSC_VDEV:
+ v = (void *)hdr + sizeof(*hdr);
+ size = sizeof(*v);
+ size += v->num_of_vrings * sizeof(struct fw_rsc_vdev_vring);
+ size += v->config_len;
+ break;
+ default:
+ dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Unsupported resource type: %d\n",
+ hdr->type);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ new_rsc_offset = max_offset + size;
+ spare_len = tablesz - new_rsc_offset;
/*
- * Allocate another contiguous chunk of memory, large enough to
- * contain the new, expanded resource table.
- *
- * The +4 is for the extra offset[] element in the top level header
+ * Available space must be greater or equal to :
+ * new offset entry size (4Bytes)
+ * + resource header size
+ * + new resource size
*/
- size += sizeof(struct fw_rsc_hdr) + request->size + 4;
- table = devm_kmemdup(&rproc->dev, old_table, size, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!table)
- return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ if (spare_len < (4 + sizeof(h) + request->size))
+ return -ENOSPC;
+
+ /* Find the lowest resource table entry */
+ min_offset = table->offset[0];
+ for (i = 1; i < table->num; i++)
+ min_offset = min(min_offset, table->offset[i]);
+
/* Shunt table by 4 Bytes to account for the extra offset[] element */
- start_of_rscs = (void *)table + table->offset[0];
+ start_of_rscs = (void *)table + min_offset;
memmove(start_of_rscs + 4,
- start_of_rscs, new_rsc_offset - table->offset[0]);
+ start_of_rscs, new_rsc_offset - min_offset);
+
new_rsc_offset += 4;
/* Update existing resource entry's offsets */
@@ -1108,8 +1142,7 @@ rproc_add_resource_table_entry(struct rproc *rproc,
new_rsc_loc = (void *)fw_header_loc + sizeof(h);
memcpy(new_rsc_loc, request->resource, request->size);
- *tablesz = size;
- return table;
+ return 0;
}
static struct resource_table*
@@ -1154,12 +1187,10 @@ rproc_apply_resource_overrides(struct rproc *rproc,
continue;
/* Didn't find matching resource entry -- creating a new one. */
- table = rproc_add_resource_table_entry(rproc, resource,
- table, &size);
- if (IS_ERR(table))
+ updated = rproc_add_resource_table_entry(rproc, resource,
+ table, size);
+ if (updated)
goto out;
-
- *orig_table = table;
}
if (IS_ENABLED(DEBUG) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG))
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-12 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-12 16:00 [PATCH v3 00/20] remoteproc: Allow platform-specific drivers to request resources Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 01/20] remoteproc: core: New API to add new resources to the resource table Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 02/20] remoteproc: core: Add function to dump " Loic Pallardy
2016-10-14 8:37 ` Matt Redfearn
2016-10-17 16:26 ` loic pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 03/20] remoteproc: core: Add function to amend an existing resource table entry Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 04/20] remoteproc: core: Add function to append a new " Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 05/20] remoteproc: core: Add function to over-ride current resource table Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 06/20] remoteproc: core: Associate action to resource request Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 07/20] remoteproc: core: Add RSC_VDEV support to rproc_request_resource Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 08/20] remoteproc: core: Complete VDEV support in rproc_dump_resource_table function Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 09/20] remoteproc: core: Unify rproc_dump_resource_table debug messages Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 10/20] remoteproc: core: Call rproc_dump_resource_table only if debug is activated Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 11/20] remoteproc: core: Correction carveout name comparison in rproc_update_resource_table_entry Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 12/20] remoteproc: core: Add function to verify an existing resource in rsc table Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 13/20] remoteproc: core: Add vdev support to resource amending function Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 14/20] remoteproc: core: Add force mode " Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` Loic Pallardy [this message]
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 16/20] remoteproc: core: Add resource request action support Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 17/20] remoteproc: core: Add function to verify resource table consistency Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 18/20] remoteproc: core: Clean-up resource table sanity checks Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 19/20] remotecore: core: Add resource table pointer argument to rproc_handle_resource Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 20/20] remoteproc: core: Support empty resource tables Loic Pallardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1476288038-24909-16-git-send-email-loic.pallardy@st.com \
--to=loic.pallardy@st.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=kernel@stlinux.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®