From: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
To: <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>, <ohad@wizery.com>, <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: <loic.pallardy@st.com>, <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel@stlinux.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 18/20] remoteproc: core: Clean-up resource table sanity checks
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:00:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1476288038-24909-19-git-send-email-loic.pallardy@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476288038-24909-1-git-send-email-loic.pallardy@st.com>
As resource table has been verified after just loading,
the different sanity checks done when accessing resources
are no more needed.
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
---
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 47 ++++++------------------------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 849460e..ee2dc8d 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(rproc_list);
typedef int (*rproc_handle_resources_t)(struct rproc *rproc,
struct resource_table *table, int len);
typedef int (*rproc_handle_resource_t)(struct rproc *rproc,
- void *, int offset, int avail);
+ void *, int offset);
/* Unique indices for remoteproc devices */
static DEFINE_IDA(rproc_dev_index);
@@ -300,7 +300,6 @@ void rproc_free_vring(struct rproc_vring *rvring)
* rproc_handle_vdev() - handle a vdev fw resource
* @rproc: the remote processor
* @rsc: the vring resource descriptor
- * @avail: size of available data (for sanity checking the image)
*
* This resource entry requests the host to statically register a virtio
* device (vdev), and setup everything needed to support it. It contains
@@ -324,19 +323,12 @@ void rproc_free_vring(struct rproc_vring *rvring)
* Returns 0 on success, or an appropriate error code otherwise
*/
static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc,
- int offset, int avail)
+ int offset)
{
struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
struct rproc_vdev *rvdev;
int i, ret;
- /* make sure resource isn't truncated */
- if (sizeof(*rsc) + rsc->num_of_vrings * sizeof(struct fw_rsc_vdev_vring)
- + rsc->config_len > avail) {
- dev_err(dev, "vdev rsc is truncated\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
/* make sure reserved bytes are zeroes */
if (rsc->reserved[0] || rsc->reserved[1]) {
dev_err(dev, "vdev rsc has non zero reserved bytes\n");
@@ -388,7 +380,6 @@ free_rvdev:
* rproc_handle_trace() - handle a shared trace buffer resource
* @rproc: the remote processor
* @rsc: the trace resource descriptor
- * @avail: size of available data (for sanity checking the image)
*
* In case the remote processor dumps trace logs into memory,
* export it via debugfs.
@@ -401,18 +392,13 @@ free_rvdev:
* Returns 0 on success, or an appropriate error code otherwise
*/
static int rproc_handle_trace(struct rproc *rproc, struct fw_rsc_trace *rsc,
- int offset, int avail)
+ int offset)
{
struct rproc_mem_entry *trace;
struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
void *ptr;
char name[15];
- if (sizeof(*rsc) > avail) {
- dev_err(dev, "trace rsc is truncated\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
/* make sure reserved bytes are zeroes */
if (rsc->reserved) {
dev_err(dev, "trace rsc has non zero reserved bytes\n");
@@ -459,7 +445,6 @@ static int rproc_handle_trace(struct rproc *rproc, struct fw_rsc_trace *rsc,
* rproc_handle_devmem() - handle devmem resource entry
* @rproc: remote processor handle
* @rsc: the devmem resource entry
- * @avail: size of available data (for sanity checking the image)
*
* Remote processors commonly need to access certain on-chip peripherals.
*
@@ -481,7 +466,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_trace(struct rproc *rproc, struct fw_rsc_trace *rsc,
* are outside those ranges.
*/
static int rproc_handle_devmem(struct rproc *rproc, struct fw_rsc_devmem *rsc,
- int offset, int avail)
+ int offset)
{
struct rproc_mem_entry *mapping;
struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
@@ -491,11 +476,6 @@ static int rproc_handle_devmem(struct rproc *rproc, struct fw_rsc_devmem *rsc,
if (!rproc->domain)
return -EINVAL;
- if (sizeof(*rsc) > avail) {
- dev_err(dev, "devmem rsc is truncated\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
/* make sure reserved bytes are zeroes */
if (rsc->reserved) {
dev_err(dev, "devmem rsc has non zero reserved bytes\n");
@@ -537,7 +517,6 @@ out:
* rproc_handle_carveout() - handle phys contig memory allocation requests
* @rproc: rproc handle
* @rsc: the resource entry
- * @avail: size of available data (for image validation)
*
* This function will handle firmware requests for allocation of physically
* contiguous memory regions.
@@ -553,7 +532,7 @@ out:
*/
static int rproc_handle_carveout(struct rproc *rproc,
struct fw_rsc_carveout *rsc,
- int offset, int avail)
+ int offset)
{
struct rproc_mem_entry *carveout, *mapping;
struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
@@ -561,11 +540,6 @@ static int rproc_handle_carveout(struct rproc *rproc,
void *va;
int ret;
- if (sizeof(*rsc) > avail) {
- dev_err(dev, "carveout rsc is truncated\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
/* make sure reserved bytes are zeroes */
if (rsc->reserved) {
dev_err(dev, "carveout rsc has non zero reserved bytes\n");
@@ -674,7 +648,7 @@ free_carv:
}
static int rproc_count_vrings(struct rproc *rproc, struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc,
- int offset, int avail)
+ int offset)
{
/* Summarize the number of notification IDs */
rproc->max_notifyid += rsc->num_of_vrings;
@@ -708,15 +682,8 @@ static int rproc_handle_resources(struct rproc *rproc, int len,
for (i = 0; i < rproc->table_ptr->num; i++) {
int offset = rproc->table_ptr->offset[i];
struct fw_rsc_hdr *hdr = (void *)rproc->table_ptr + offset;
- int avail = len - offset - sizeof(*hdr);
void *rsc = (void *)hdr + sizeof(*hdr);
- /* make sure table isn't truncated */
- if (avail < 0) {
- dev_err(dev, "rsc table is truncated\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
dev_dbg(dev, "rsc: type %d\n", hdr->type);
if (hdr->type >= RSC_LAST) {
@@ -728,7 +695,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_resources(struct rproc *rproc, int len,
if (!handler)
continue;
- ret = handler(rproc, rsc, offset + sizeof(*hdr), avail);
+ ret = handler(rproc, rsc, offset + sizeof(*hdr));
if (ret)
break;
}
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-12 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-12 16:00 [PATCH v3 00/20] remoteproc: Allow platform-specific drivers to request resources Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 01/20] remoteproc: core: New API to add new resources to the resource table Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 02/20] remoteproc: core: Add function to dump " Loic Pallardy
2016-10-14 8:37 ` Matt Redfearn
2016-10-17 16:26 ` loic pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 03/20] remoteproc: core: Add function to amend an existing resource table entry Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 04/20] remoteproc: core: Add function to append a new " Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 05/20] remoteproc: core: Add function to over-ride current resource table Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 06/20] remoteproc: core: Associate action to resource request Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 07/20] remoteproc: core: Add RSC_VDEV support to rproc_request_resource Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 08/20] remoteproc: core: Complete VDEV support in rproc_dump_resource_table function Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 09/20] remoteproc: core: Unify rproc_dump_resource_table debug messages Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 10/20] remoteproc: core: Call rproc_dump_resource_table only if debug is activated Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 11/20] remoteproc: core: Correction carveout name comparison in rproc_update_resource_table_entry Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 12/20] remoteproc: core: Add function to verify an existing resource in rsc table Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 13/20] remoteproc: core: Add vdev support to resource amending function Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 14/20] remoteproc: core: Add force mode " Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 15/20] remoteproc: core: Append resource only if .resource_table section is large enough Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 16/20] remoteproc: core: Add resource request action support Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 17/20] remoteproc: core: Add function to verify resource table consistency Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` Loic Pallardy [this message]
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 19/20] remotecore: core: Add resource table pointer argument to rproc_handle_resource Loic Pallardy
2016-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 20/20] remoteproc: core: Support empty resource tables Loic Pallardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1476288038-24909-19-git-send-email-loic.pallardy@st.com \
--to=loic.pallardy@st.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=kernel@stlinux.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®