From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jmattson@google.com,
rkrcmar@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/5] KVM: nVMX: fix checks on CR{0,4} during virtual VMX operation
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:14:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1480472050-58023-4-git-send-email-dmatlack@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1480472050-58023-1-git-send-email-dmatlack@google.com>
KVM emulates MSR_IA32_VMX_CR{0,4}_FIXED1 with the value -1ULL, meaning
all CR0 and CR4 bits are allowed to be 1 during VMX operation.
This does not match real hardware, which disallows the high 32 bits of
CR0 to be 1, and disallows reserved bits of CR4 to be 1 (including bits
which are defined in the SDM but missing according to CPUID). A guest
can induce a VM-entry failure by setting these bits in GUEST_CR0 and
GUEST_CR4, despite MSR_IA32_VMX_CR{0,4}_FIXED1 indicating they are
valid.
Since KVM has allowed all bits to be 1 in CR0 and CR4, the existing
checks on these registers do not verify must-be-0 bits. Fix these checks
to identify must-be-0 bits according to MSR_IA32_VMX_CR{0,4}_FIXED1.
This patch should introduce no change in behavior in KVM, since these
MSRs are still -1ULL.
Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 01a2b9e..b414513 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -2864,12 +2864,18 @@ static void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
vmx->nested.nested_vmx_vmcs_enum = 0x2e;
}
+/*
+ * if fixed0[i] == 1: val[i] must be 1
+ * if fixed1[i] == 0: val[i] must be 0
+ */
+static inline bool fixed_bits_valid(u64 val, u64 fixed0, u64 fixed1)
+{
+ return ((val & fixed1) | fixed0) == val;
+}
+
static inline bool vmx_control_verify(u32 control, u32 low, u32 high)
{
- /*
- * Bits 0 in high must be 0, and bits 1 in low must be 1.
- */
- return ((control & high) | low) == control;
+ return fixed_bits_valid(control, low, high);
}
static inline u64 vmx_control_msr(u32 low, u32 high)
@@ -4104,6 +4110,40 @@ static void ept_save_pdptrs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
(unsigned long *)&vcpu->arch.regs_dirty);
}
+static bool nested_guest_cr0_valid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long val)
+{
+ u64 fixed0 = to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.nested_vmx_cr0_fixed0;
+ u64 fixed1 = to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.nested_vmx_cr0_fixed1;
+ struct vmcs12 *vmcs12 = get_vmcs12(vcpu);
+
+ if (to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_high &
+ SECONDARY_EXEC_UNRESTRICTED_GUEST &&
+ nested_cpu_has2(vmcs12, SECONDARY_EXEC_UNRESTRICTED_GUEST))
+ fixed0 &= ~(X86_CR0_PE | X86_CR0_PG);
+
+ return fixed_bits_valid(val, fixed0, fixed1);
+}
+
+static bool nested_host_cr0_valid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long val)
+{
+ u64 fixed0 = to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.nested_vmx_cr0_fixed0;
+ u64 fixed1 = to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.nested_vmx_cr0_fixed1;
+
+ return fixed_bits_valid(val, fixed0, fixed1);
+}
+
+static bool nested_cr4_valid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long val)
+{
+ u64 fixed0 = to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.nested_vmx_cr4_fixed0;
+ u64 fixed1 = to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.nested_vmx_cr4_fixed1;
+
+ return fixed_bits_valid(val, fixed0, fixed1);
+}
+
+/* No difference in the restrictions on guest and host CR4 in VMX operation. */
+#define nested_guest_cr4_valid nested_cr4_valid
+#define nested_host_cr4_valid nested_cr4_valid
+
static int vmx_set_cr4(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr4);
static void ept_update_paging_mode_cr0(unsigned long *hw_cr0,
@@ -4232,8 +4272,8 @@ static int vmx_set_cr4(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr4)
if (!nested_vmx_allowed(vcpu))
return 1;
}
- if (to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.vmxon &&
- ((cr4 & VMXON_CR4_ALWAYSON) != VMXON_CR4_ALWAYSON))
+
+ if (to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.vmxon && !nested_cr4_valid(vcpu, cr4))
return 1;
vcpu->arch.cr4 = cr4;
@@ -5852,18 +5892,6 @@ vmx_patch_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned char *hypercall)
hypercall[2] = 0xc1;
}
-static bool nested_cr0_valid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long val)
-{
- unsigned long always_on = VMXON_CR0_ALWAYSON;
- struct vmcs12 *vmcs12 = get_vmcs12(vcpu);
-
- if (to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_high &
- SECONDARY_EXEC_UNRESTRICTED_GUEST &&
- nested_cpu_has2(vmcs12, SECONDARY_EXEC_UNRESTRICTED_GUEST))
- always_on &= ~(X86_CR0_PE | X86_CR0_PG);
- return (val & always_on) == always_on;
-}
-
/* called to set cr0 as appropriate for a mov-to-cr0 exit. */
static int handle_set_cr0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long val)
{
@@ -5882,7 +5910,7 @@ static int handle_set_cr0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long val)
val = (val & ~vmcs12->cr0_guest_host_mask) |
(vmcs12->guest_cr0 & vmcs12->cr0_guest_host_mask);
- if (!nested_cr0_valid(vcpu, val))
+ if (!nested_guest_cr0_valid(vcpu, val))
return 1;
if (kvm_set_cr0(vcpu, val))
@@ -5891,8 +5919,9 @@ static int handle_set_cr0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long val)
return 0;
} else {
if (to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.vmxon &&
- ((val & VMXON_CR0_ALWAYSON) != VMXON_CR0_ALWAYSON))
+ !nested_host_cr0_valid(vcpu, val))
return 1;
+
return kvm_set_cr0(vcpu, val);
}
}
@@ -10438,15 +10467,15 @@ static int nested_vmx_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool launch)
return 1;
}
- if (((vmcs12->host_cr0 & VMXON_CR0_ALWAYSON) != VMXON_CR0_ALWAYSON) ||
- ((vmcs12->host_cr4 & VMXON_CR4_ALWAYSON) != VMXON_CR4_ALWAYSON)) {
+ if (!nested_host_cr0_valid(vcpu, vmcs12->host_cr0) ||
+ !nested_host_cr4_valid(vcpu, vmcs12->host_cr4)) {
nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu,
VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_HOST_STATE_FIELD);
return 1;
}
- if (!nested_cr0_valid(vcpu, vmcs12->guest_cr0) ||
- ((vmcs12->guest_cr4 & VMXON_CR4_ALWAYSON) != VMXON_CR4_ALWAYSON)) {
+ if (!nested_guest_cr0_valid(vcpu, vmcs12->guest_cr0) ||
+ !nested_guest_cr4_valid(vcpu, vmcs12->guest_cr4)) {
nested_vmx_entry_failure(vcpu, vmcs12,
EXIT_REASON_INVALID_STATE, ENTRY_FAIL_DEFAULT);
return 1;
--
2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-30 2:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-30 2:14 [PATCH v3 0/5] VMX Capability MSRs David Matlack
2016-11-30 2:14 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] KVM: nVMX: generate non-true VMX MSRs based on true versions David Matlack
2016-11-30 11:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-30 18:05 ` David Matlack
2016-11-30 20:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-30 2:14 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] KVM: nVMX: support restore of VMX capability MSRs David Matlack
2016-11-30 2:14 ` David Matlack [this message]
2016-11-30 21:52 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] KVM: nVMX: fix checks on CR{0,4} during virtual VMX operation Radim Krčmář
2016-11-30 22:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-30 23:53 ` David Matlack
2016-12-01 13:21 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-11-30 2:14 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] KVM: nVMX: generate MSR_IA32_CR{0,4}_FIXED1 from guest CPUID David Matlack
2016-11-30 2:14 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: nVMX: load GUEST_EFER after GUEST_CR0 during emulated VM-entry David Matlack
2016-11-30 11:22 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] VMX Capability MSRs Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-30 18:05 ` David Matlack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1480472050-58023-4-git-send-email-dmatlack@google.com \
--to=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome