From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
bobby.prani@gmail.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 2/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks snapshot operation
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 18:45:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1484707528-2176-2-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170118024456.GA2042@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit is the second step towards full abstraction of all accesses to
the ->dynticks counter, implementing the previously open-coded atomic
add of zero in a new rcu_dynticks_snap() function. This abstraction will
ease changes o the ->dynticks counter operation.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 6 ++----
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 14e283c351f6..805d55ee0b2a 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -282,6 +282,17 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_dynticks, rcu_dynticks) = {
};
/*
+ * Snapshot the ->dynticks counter with full ordering so as to allow
+ * stable comparison of this counter with past and future snapshots.
+ */
+static int rcu_dynticks_snap(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp)
+{
+ int snap = atomic_add_return(0, &rdtp->dynticks);
+
+ return snap;
+}
+
+/*
* Do a double-increment of the ->dynticks counter to emulate a
* momentary idle-CPU quiescent state.
*/
@@ -1049,7 +1060,9 @@ void rcu_nmi_exit(void)
*/
bool notrace __rcu_is_watching(void)
{
- return atomic_read(this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_dynticks.dynticks)) & 0x1;
+ struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_dynticks);
+
+ return atomic_read(&rdtp->dynticks) & 0x1;
}
/**
@@ -1132,7 +1145,7 @@ static int rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle(void)
static int dyntick_save_progress_counter(struct rcu_data *rdp,
bool *isidle, unsigned long *maxj)
{
- rdp->dynticks_snap = atomic_add_return(0, &rdp->dynticks->dynticks);
+ rdp->dynticks_snap = rcu_dynticks_snap(rdp->dynticks);
rcu_sysidle_check_cpu(rdp, isidle, maxj);
if ((rdp->dynticks_snap & 0x1) == 0) {
trace_rcu_fqs(rdp->rsp->name, rdp->gpnum, rdp->cpu, TPS("dti"));
@@ -1157,7 +1170,7 @@ static int rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs(struct rcu_data *rdp,
int *rcrmp;
unsigned int snap;
- curr = (unsigned int)atomic_add_return(0, &rdp->dynticks->dynticks);
+ curr = (unsigned int)rcu_dynticks_snap(rdp->dynticks);
snap = (unsigned int)rdp->dynticks_snap;
/*
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index e59e1849b89a..011f626b2fd8 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -356,10 +356,9 @@ static void sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus(struct rcu_state *rsp,
mask_ofl_test = 0;
for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu) {
struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu);
- struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = &per_cpu(rcu_dynticks, cpu);
rdp->exp_dynticks_snap =
- atomic_add_return(0, &rdtp->dynticks);
+ rcu_dynticks_snap(rdp->dynticks);
if (raw_smp_processor_id() == cpu ||
!(rdp->exp_dynticks_snap & 0x1) ||
!(rnp->qsmaskinitnext & rdp->grpmask))
@@ -380,12 +379,11 @@ static void sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus(struct rcu_state *rsp,
for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu) {
unsigned long mask = leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu);
struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu);
- struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = &per_cpu(rcu_dynticks, cpu);
if (!(mask_ofl_ipi & mask))
continue;
retry_ipi:
- if (atomic_add_return(0, &rdtp->dynticks) !=
+ if (rcu_dynticks_snap(rdp->dynticks) !=
rdp->exp_dynticks_snap) {
mask_ofl_test |= mask;
continue;
--
2.5.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-18 2:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-14 8:54 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/6] Dynticks updates for 4.11 Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14 8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks momentary-idle operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16 7:39 ` Josh Triplett
2017-01-16 11:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16 18:57 ` Josh Triplett
2017-01-16 23:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14 8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks snapshot operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14 8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/6] rcu: Abstract dynticks extended quiescent state enter/exit operations Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16 7:47 ` Josh Triplett
2017-01-16 11:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16 19:25 ` Josh Triplett
2017-01-17 0:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16 16:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-16 21:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-17 0:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14 8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/6] rcu: Abstract extended quiescent state determination Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14 8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/6] rcu: Check cond_resched_rcu_qs() state less often to reduce GP overhead Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14 8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcu: Adjust FQS offline checks for exact online-CPU detection Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16 7:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/6] Dynticks updates for 4.11 Josh Triplett
2017-01-18 2:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 1/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks momentary-idle operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18 2:45 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2017-01-18 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 3/6] rcu: Abstract dynticks extended quiescent state enter/exit operations Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-21 20:49 ` Josh Triplett
2017-01-23 19:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 4/6] rcu: Abstract extended quiescent state determination Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 5/6] rcu: Check cond_resched_rcu_qs() state less often to reduce GP overhead Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcu: Adjust FQS offline checks for exact online-CPU detection Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 0/6] Dynticks updates for 4.11 Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 1/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks momentary-idle operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 2/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks snapshot operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 3/6] rcu: Abstract dynticks extended quiescent state enter/exit operations Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 4/6] rcu: Abstract extended quiescent state determination Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 5/6] rcu: Check cond_resched_rcu_qs() state less often to reduce GP overhead Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcu: Adjust FQS offline checks for exact online-CPU detection Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1484707528-2176-2-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®