mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, bobby.prani@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/6] rcu: Abstract dynticks extended quiescent state enter/exit operations
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:12:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170117001237.GU5238@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170116192537.etuzs7lvo2h7il6g@x>

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:25:38AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 03:34:20AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 11:47:35PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 12:54:42AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

[ . . . ]

> > > > @@ -693,7 +752,7 @@ static void rcu_eqs_enter_common(long long oldval, bool user)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	struct rcu_state *rsp;
> > > >  	struct rcu_data *rdp;
> > > > -	struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_dynticks);
> > > > +	struct rcu_dynticks __maybe_unused *rdtp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_dynticks);
> > > 
> > > Rather than marking a local variable as __maybe_unused (such that the
> > > compiler can no longer help detect it as unused), could you move it into
> > > the portion of the function that uses it, so that if reached, it'll
> > > always get used?
> > > 
> > > >  	trace_rcu_dyntick(TPS("Start"), oldval, rdtp->dynticks_nesting);
> > 
> > Its only use is in the above event trace, which can be disabled via
> > CONFIG_RCU_TRACE=n.  I could put the definition of rdtp under #ifdef,
> > but this seems ugly.  I could eliminate the variable, substituting
> > the initialization for rdtp in the event trace, but that would make
> > for a very long line, or an odd line break.
> 
> For the trace_rcu_dyntick calls, you could create a small static inline
> helper to do the tracing, eliminating the third argument.  Or you could
> create a helper that returns
> this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_dynticks)->dynticks_nesting.  Either way would work.
> 
> Or, if you prefer, you could wrap the variable
> declaration/initialization in RCU_TRACE() rather than adding
> __maybe_unused.

RCU_TRACE() it is in both cases, thank you!  (You would think I would
remember the code that I wrote...)

							Thanx, Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-17  0:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-14  8:54 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/6] Dynticks updates for 4.11 Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14  8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks momentary-idle operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16  7:39   ` Josh Triplett
2017-01-16 11:22     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16 18:57       ` Josh Triplett
2017-01-16 23:48         ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14  8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks snapshot operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14  8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/6] rcu: Abstract dynticks extended quiescent state enter/exit operations Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16  7:47   ` Josh Triplett
2017-01-16 11:34     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16 19:25       ` Josh Triplett
2017-01-17  0:12         ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2017-01-16 16:43   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-16 21:01     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-17  0:06       ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14  8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/6] rcu: Abstract extended quiescent state determination Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14  8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/6] rcu: Check cond_resched_rcu_qs() state less often to reduce GP overhead Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14  8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcu: Adjust FQS offline checks for exact online-CPU detection Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16  7:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/6] Dynticks updates for 4.11 Josh Triplett
2017-01-18  2:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18  2:45   ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 1/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks momentary-idle operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18  2:45   ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 2/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks snapshot operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18  2:45   ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 3/6] rcu: Abstract dynticks extended quiescent state enter/exit operations Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-21 20:49     ` Josh Triplett
2017-01-23 19:45       ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18  2:45   ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 4/6] rcu: Abstract extended quiescent state determination Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18  2:45   ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 5/6] rcu: Check cond_resched_rcu_qs() state less often to reduce GP overhead Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18  2:45   ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcu: Adjust FQS offline checks for exact online-CPU detection Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46   ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 0/6] Dynticks updates for 4.11 Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46     ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 1/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks momentary-idle operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46     ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 2/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks snapshot operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46     ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 3/6] rcu: Abstract dynticks extended quiescent state enter/exit operations Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46     ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 4/6] rcu: Abstract extended quiescent state determination Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46     ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 5/6] rcu: Check cond_resched_rcu_qs() state less often to reduce GP overhead Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46     ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcu: Adjust FQS offline checks for exact online-CPU detection Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170117001237.GU5238@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome