* 2.4.0-pre10: svclock: missing unlock_kernel()
@ 2000-11-01 12:04 Trond Myklebust
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Trond Myklebust @ 2000-11-01 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds; +Cc: linux-kernel
Linus,
I missed a conditional return in nlmsvc_notify_blocked() when we
should be releasing the BKL. Thanks to Jim Castleberry for pointing it
out.
Please note, however, that there remain serious bugs in 2.4.0-pre10
fs/locks.c w.r.t. notification of the filesystem/lockd that need to be
fixed before the 2.4.0 release.
Cheers,
Trond
--- fs/lockd/svclock.c.orig Tue Oct 31 00:31:49 2000
+++ fs/lockd/svclock.c Wed Nov 1 12:57:25 2000
@@ -473,6 +473,7 @@
if (nlm_compare_locks(&block->b_call.a_args.lock.fl, fl)) {
nlmsvc_insert_block(block, 0);
svc_wake_up(block->b_daemon);
+ unlock_kernel();
return;
}
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2000-11-01 12:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-11-01 12:04 2.4.0-pre10: svclock: missing unlock_kernel() Trond Myklebust
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®