From: Tobin Harding <me@tobin.cc>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arch/x86: Fix sparse warning symbol not declared
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:19:12 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1487665152.3502698.887669128.7FFD96E7@webmail.messagingengine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1702132204010.8088@nanos>
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017, at 08:24 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, Tobin Harding wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 12:06:47PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > The proper solution is to have a local include file 'purgatory.h' and put
> > > the declaration there. Include it in both files even if that's not required
> > > for the ASM file. But that documents, that the function is used outside of
> > > purgatory.c
> >
> > Blindly following instructions led to the bone headed patch I
> > submitted yesterday (without building). Is there some way to include a
> > C header in an ASM file that I do not know about?
>
> Yes, you have to guard the function declaration with
>
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
> I did not think about that when I suggested this. Brainslip :)
>
> So yes, it's kinda pointless, but it still has documentatory value and
> keeps the sparse build clean.
>
> > Thanks for patiently pointing out how to write a commit log. May I
> > please bother you with another small etiquette question. Should I
> > have replayed to you as I have done so or should I have re-sent another
> > patch (v3) with the mistakes fixed (and stated in the log that I did
> > not know how to implement the suggestions).
>
> All good. Either way works as long as you notice your own mistakes. It's
> also fine to tell me that I suggested nonsense. :)
>
It has been pointed out to me that I could have approached the dev
process of this patch better. In the name of learning the correct method
I am now replying to your comments Thomas. Thanks for being patient, if
you could please slap me if I slip I should be able to blossom into a
decent contributor.
After sending an incorrect version (v3) with the __ASSEMBLY__
preprocessor guard in the wrong place, I re-sent v4 with what I believe
is all of your comments implemented and functioning.
Thanks for taking the time to review my annoying multi-version almost
trivial patch series.
thanks,
Tobin.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-21 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-12 6:44 [PATCH 0/2] arch/x86: Fix sparse warning Tobin C. Harding
2017-02-12 6:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] arch/x86: Fix sparse warning symbol not declared Tobin C. Harding
2017-02-12 10:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-12 6:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Tobin C. Harding
2017-02-12 11:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-13 20:26 ` Tobin Harding
2017-02-13 21:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-21 8:19 ` Tobin Harding [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1487665152.3502698.887669128.7FFD96E7@webmail.messagingengine.com \
--to=me@tobin.cc \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®