From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: <peterz@infradead.org>, <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <juri.lelli@gmail.com>,
<rostedt@goodmis.org>, <bristot@redhat.com>,
<kernel-team@lge.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/5] sched/deadline: Make find_later_rq() choose a closer cpu in topology
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 14:48:46 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1494568129-9985-3-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1494568129-9985-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
When cpudl_find() returns any among free_cpus, the cpu might not be
closer than others, considering sched domain. For example:
this_cpu: 15
free_cpus: 0, 1,..., 14 (== later_mask)
best_cpu: 0
topology:
0 --+
+--+
1 --+ |
+-- ... --+
2 --+ | |
+--+ |
3 --+ |
... ...
12 --+ |
+--+ |
13 --+ | |
+-- ... -+
14 --+ |
+--+
15 --+
In this case, it would be best to select 14 since it's a free cpu and
closest to 15(this_cpu). However, currently the code select 0(best_cpu)
even though that's just any among free_cpus. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index a2ce590..9d997d9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1324,7 +1324,7 @@ static int find_later_rq(struct task_struct *task)
struct sched_domain *sd;
struct cpumask *later_mask = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(local_cpu_mask_dl);
int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
- int best_cpu, cpu = task_cpu(task);
+ int cpu = task_cpu(task);
/* Make sure the mask is initialized first */
if (unlikely(!later_mask))
@@ -1337,17 +1337,14 @@ static int find_later_rq(struct task_struct *task)
* We have to consider system topology and task affinity
* first, then we can look for a suitable cpu.
*/
- best_cpu = cpudl_find(&task_rq(task)->rd->cpudl,
- task, later_mask);
- if (best_cpu == -1)
+ if (cpudl_find(&task_rq(task)->rd->cpudl, task, later_mask) == -1)
return -1;
/*
- * If we are here, some target has been found,
- * the most suitable of which is cached in best_cpu.
- * This is, among the runqueues where the current tasks
- * have later deadlines than the task's one, the rq
- * with the latest possible one.
+ * If we are here, some targets have been found, including
+ * the most suitable which is, among the runqueues where the
+ * current tasks have later deadlines than the task's one, the
+ * rq with the latest possible one.
*
* Now we check how well this matches with task's
* affinity and system topology.
@@ -1367,6 +1364,7 @@ static int find_later_rq(struct task_struct *task)
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
if (sd->flags & SD_WAKE_AFFINE) {
+ int best_cpu;
/*
* If possible, preempting this_cpu is
@@ -1378,12 +1376,15 @@ static int find_later_rq(struct task_struct *task)
return this_cpu;
}
+ best_cpu = cpumask_first_and(later_mask,
+ sched_domain_span(sd));
/*
- * Last chance: if best_cpu is valid and is
- * in the mask, that becomes our choice.
+ * Last chance: if a cpu being in both later_mask
+ * and current sd span is valid, that becomes our
+ * choice. Of course, the latest possible cpu is
+ * already under consideration through later_mask.
*/
- if (best_cpu < nr_cpu_ids &&
- cpumask_test_cpu(best_cpu, sched_domain_span(sd))) {
+ if (best_cpu < nr_cpu_ids) {
rcu_read_unlock();
return best_cpu;
}
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-12 5:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-12 5:48 [PATCH v4 0/5] " Byungchul Park
2017-05-12 5:48 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] sched/deadline: Refer to cpudl.elements atomically Byungchul Park
2017-05-12 14:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-05-15 8:36 ` Juri Lelli
2017-05-16 7:00 ` Byungchul Park
2017-05-16 6:52 ` Byungchul Park
2017-05-16 10:32 ` Juri Lelli
2017-05-16 13:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-05-23 1:11 ` Byungchul Park
2017-05-12 5:48 ` Byungchul Park [this message]
2017-05-12 5:48 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] sched/deadline: Change return value of cpudl_find() Byungchul Park
2017-05-12 5:48 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] sched/deadline: Add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING on find_later_rq() Byungchul Park
2017-05-12 5:48 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] sched/rt: Add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING on find_lowest_rq() Byungchul Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1494568129-9985-3-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com \
--to=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®