From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: <peterz@infradead.org>, <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <juri.lelli@gmail.com>,
<rostedt@goodmis.org>, <bristot@redhat.com>,
<kernel-team@lge.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/5] sched/deadline: Change return value of cpudl_find()
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 14:48:47 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1494568129-9985-4-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1494568129-9985-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
Currently cpudl_find() returns the best cpu that means it has the
maximum dl, however, the value is already kept in later_mask and the
return value is not referred directly any more.
Now, it's enough to return whether CPUs were found or not, like rt.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
---
kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c | 13 +++++--------
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c b/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
index 6b67016..28d057f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
@@ -119,18 +119,16 @@ static inline int cpudl_maximum(struct cpudl *cp)
* @p: the task
* @later_mask: a mask to fill in with the selected CPUs (or NULL)
*
- * Returns: int - best CPU (heap maximum if suitable)
+ * Returns: (int)bool - CPUs were found
*/
int cpudl_find(struct cpudl *cp, struct task_struct *p,
struct cpumask *later_mask)
{
- int best_cpu = -1;
const struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl;
if (later_mask &&
cpumask_and(later_mask, cp->free_cpus, &p->cpus_allowed)) {
- best_cpu = cpumask_any(later_mask);
- goto out;
+ return 1;
} else {
u64 cpudl_dl;
int cpudl_cpu;
@@ -157,14 +155,13 @@ int cpudl_find(struct cpudl *cp, struct task_struct *p,
if (cpudl_valid != IDX_INVALID &&
cpumask_test_cpu(cpudl_cpu, &p->cpus_allowed) &&
dl_time_before(dl_se->deadline, cpudl_dl)) {
- best_cpu = cpudl_cpu;
if (later_mask)
- cpumask_set_cpu(best_cpu, later_mask);
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpudl_cpu, later_mask);
+ return 1;
}
}
-out:
- return best_cpu;
+ return 0;
}
/*
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 9d997d9..0223694 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ static void check_preempt_equal_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
* let's hope p can move out.
*/
if (rq->curr->nr_cpus_allowed == 1 ||
- cpudl_find(&rq->rd->cpudl, rq->curr, NULL) == -1)
+ !cpudl_find(&rq->rd->cpudl, rq->curr, NULL))
return;
/*
@@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ static void check_preempt_equal_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
* see if it is pushed or pulled somewhere else.
*/
if (p->nr_cpus_allowed != 1 &&
- cpudl_find(&rq->rd->cpudl, p, NULL) != -1)
+ cpudl_find(&rq->rd->cpudl, p, NULL))
return;
resched_curr(rq);
@@ -1337,7 +1337,7 @@ static int find_later_rq(struct task_struct *task)
* We have to consider system topology and task affinity
* first, then we can look for a suitable cpu.
*/
- if (cpudl_find(&task_rq(task)->rd->cpudl, task, later_mask) == -1)
+ if (!cpudl_find(&task_rq(task)->rd->cpudl, task, later_mask))
return -1;
/*
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-12 5:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-12 5:48 [PATCH v4 0/5] Make find_later_rq() choose a closer cpu in topology Byungchul Park
2017-05-12 5:48 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] sched/deadline: Refer to cpudl.elements atomically Byungchul Park
2017-05-12 14:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-05-15 8:36 ` Juri Lelli
2017-05-16 7:00 ` Byungchul Park
2017-05-16 6:52 ` Byungchul Park
2017-05-16 10:32 ` Juri Lelli
2017-05-16 13:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-05-23 1:11 ` Byungchul Park
2017-05-12 5:48 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] sched/deadline: Make find_later_rq() choose a closer cpu in topology Byungchul Park
2017-05-12 5:48 ` Byungchul Park [this message]
2017-05-12 5:48 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] sched/deadline: Add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING on find_later_rq() Byungchul Park
2017-05-12 5:48 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] sched/rt: Add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING on find_lowest_rq() Byungchul Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1494568129-9985-4-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com \
--to=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®