mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] iommu: of: Fix check for returning EPROBE_DEFER
@ 2017-05-16  5:24 Sricharan R
  2017-05-16 14:09 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sricharan R @ 2017-05-16  5:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: robin.murphy, will.deacon, joro, lorenzo.pieralisi, iommu,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, m.szyprowski, bhelgaas,
	linux-pci, linux-acpi, tn, hanjun.guo, okaya, robh+dt,
	frowand.list, devicetree, linux-kernel, sudeep.holla, rjw, lenb,
	catalin.marinas, arnd, linux-arch, gregkh
  Cc: sricharan

While returning EPROBE_DEFER for iommu masters
take in to account of iommu nodes that could be
marked in DT as 'status=disabled', in which case
simply return NULL and let the master's probe
continue rather than deferring.

Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
index 9f44ee8..e6e9bec 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ static bool of_iommu_driver_present(struct device_node *np)
 
 	ops = iommu_ops_from_fwnode(fwnode);
 	if ((ops && !ops->of_xlate) ||
+	    !of_device_is_available(iommu_spec->np) ||
 	    (!ops && !of_iommu_driver_present(iommu_spec->np)))
 		return NULL;
 
-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] iommu: of: Fix check for returning EPROBE_DEFER
  2017-05-16  5:24 [PATCH] iommu: of: Fix check for returning EPROBE_DEFER Sricharan R
@ 2017-05-16 14:09 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
  2017-05-17  5:17   ` Sricharan R
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Neuschäfer @ 2017-05-16 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sricharan R
  Cc: robin.murphy, will.deacon, joro, lorenzo.pieralisi, iommu,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, m.szyprowski, bhelgaas,
	linux-pci, linux-acpi, tn, hanjun.guo, okaya, robh+dt,
	frowand.list, devicetree, linux-kernel, sudeep.holla, rjw, lenb,
	catalin.marinas, arnd, linux-arch, gregkh

Hi, I have a few suggestions on how to make this commit message more
readable:

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 10:54:13AM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
> While returning EPROBE_DEFER for iommu masters

Add a comma at the end of this line

> take in to account of iommu nodes that could be

s/in to/into/
s/of iommu/of_iommu/

> marked in DT as 'status=disabled', in which case
> simply return NULL and let the master's probe
> continue rather than deferring.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
> Tested-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>


Thanks,
Jonathan Neuschäfer

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] iommu: of: Fix check for returning EPROBE_DEFER
  2017-05-16 14:09 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
@ 2017-05-17  5:17   ` Sricharan R
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sricharan R @ 2017-05-17  5:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jonathan Neuschäfer
  Cc: robin.murphy, will.deacon, joro, lorenzo.pieralisi, iommu,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, m.szyprowski, bhelgaas,
	linux-pci, linux-acpi, tn, hanjun.guo, okaya, robh+dt,
	frowand.list, devicetree, linux-kernel, sudeep.holla, rjw, lenb,
	catalin.marinas, arnd, linux-arch, gregkh

Hi,

On 5/16/2017 7:39 PM, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote:
> Hi, I have a few suggestions on how to make this commit message more
> readable:
> 
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 10:54:13AM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
>> While returning EPROBE_DEFER for iommu masters
> 
> Add a comma at the end of this line
> 
>> take in to account of iommu nodes that could be
> 
> s/in to/into/
> s/of iommu/of_iommu/
> 

ok, will correct the above.

Regards,
 Sricharan

>> marked in DT as 'status=disabled', in which case
>> simply return NULL and let the master's probe
>> continue rather than deferring.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
>> Tested-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Jonathan Neuschäfer
> 

-- 
"QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-05-17  5:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-05-16  5:24 [PATCH] iommu: of: Fix check for returning EPROBE_DEFER Sricharan R
2017-05-16 14:09 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
2017-05-17  5:17   ` Sricharan R

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome