mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <andrewm@uow.edu.au>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@oss.sgi.com" <netdev@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:45:04 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <14967.24592.679296.55231@pizda.ninka.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010131133123.A7875@metastasis.f00f.org>
In-Reply-To: <3A76B72D.2DD3E640@uow.edu.au> <3A728475.34CF841@uow.edu.au> <3A726087.764CC02E@uow.edu.au> <20010126222003.A11994@vitelus.com> <14966.22671.446439.838872@pizda.ninka.net> <14966.47384.971741.939842@pizda.ninka.net> <3A76D6A4.2385185E@uow.edu.au> <20010131064911.B7244@metastasis.f00f.org> <14967.15765.553667.802101@pizda.ninka.net> <20010131133123.A7875@metastasis.f00f.org>


Chris Wedgwood writes:
 > There are ... <pause> ... 3 switches between four switches in
 > between, mostly linked via GE. I'm not sure if latency might be an
 > issue here, is it was critical I can imagine 10 km of glass might be
 > a problem but it's not _that_ far...

Other than this, I don't know what to postulate.  Really,
most reports and my own experimentation (directly connected
Linux knfsd to 2.4.x nfs client) supports the fact that our
client can saturate 100baseT rather fully.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-01-31  0:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-01-27  5:45 Andrew Morton
2001-01-27  6:20 ` Aaron Lehmann
2001-01-27  8:19   ` Andrew Morton
2001-01-27 10:09     ` Ion Badulescu
2001-01-27 10:45       ` Andrew Morton
2001-01-30  6:00   ` David S. Miller
2001-01-30 12:44     ` Andrew Morton
2001-01-30 12:52     ` David S. Miller
2001-01-30 14:58       ` Andrew Morton
2001-01-30 17:49         ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-01-30 22:17         ` David S. Miller
2001-01-31  0:31           ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-01-31  0:45           ` David S. Miller [this message]
2001-01-30 22:28       ` David S. Miller
2001-01-30 23:34         ` Andrew Morton
2001-02-02 10:12     ` Andrew Morton
2001-02-02 12:14       ` Trond Myklebust
2001-02-02 17:51       ` David Lang
2001-02-02 22:46       ` David S. Miller
2001-02-02 22:57         ` David Lang
2001-02-03  2:27           ` James Sutherland
2001-02-02 23:09         ` David S. Miller
2001-02-02 23:13           ` David Lang
2001-02-02 23:28             ` Jeff Barrow
2001-02-02 23:31           ` David S. Miller
2001-01-27 10:05 ` Ion Badulescu
2001-01-27 10:39   ` Andrew Morton
2001-01-27 12:49   ` jamal
2001-01-30  1:06     ` Ion Badulescu
2001-01-30  2:48       ` jamal
2001-01-30  3:26         ` Ion Badulescu
2001-01-31  0:53           ` Still not sexy! (Re: " jamal
2001-01-31  0:59             ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-31  1:04               ` jamal
2001-01-31  1:14                 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-31  1:39                   ` jamal
2001-01-31 11:21                   ` Malcolm Beattie
2001-01-31 11:24                     ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-31  1:10             ` Still not sexy! (Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to dowith ECN) Rick Jones
2001-01-31  1:45               ` jamal
2001-01-31  2:25                 ` Still not sexy! (Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing todowith ECN) Rick Jones
2001-02-04 19:48                   ` jamal
2001-02-05 18:51                     ` Rick Jones
2001-02-05  5:13                   ` David S. Miller
2001-01-27 12:43 ` sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN) jamal
2001-01-27 13:29   ` Andrew Morton
2001-01-27 14:15     ` jamal
2001-01-28 16:05       ` Andrew Morton
2001-01-29 18:50   ` Rick Jones
     [not found] ` <200101271854.VAA02845@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
2001-01-28  5:34   ` Andrew Morton
2001-01-28 13:37     ` Felix von Leitner
2001-01-28 14:11       ` Dan Hollis
2001-01-28 14:27       ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-29 21:50         ` Pavel Machek
2001-01-28 19:43       ` Gregory Maxwell
2001-01-28 19:48       ` Choosing Linux NICs (was: Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN)) Felix von Leitner
2001-01-29 16:16 sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN) Jonathan Earle
2001-01-29 16:34 ` Antonin Kral
2001-01-31  1:49 Bernd Eckenfels

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=14967.24592.679296.55231@pizda.ninka.net \
    --to=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrewm@uow.edu.au \
    --cc=cw@f00f.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®