mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/x86: clarify that there is no buffer overflow on sscanf usage
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:58:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <14b56564-cfa0-e6aa-7f5d-57431be7eb03@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180211205924.GA23210@light.dominikbrodowski.net>

On 02/11/2018 01:59 PM, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> 
> Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
> 

Missing commit log. Please add one.

thanks,
-- Shuah

> ---
> 
>> Yeah, probably - but still, this connection and the sscanf() guarantee is not 
>> obvious at first sight, so please improve this to derive from the same value 
>> (define a LINE_MAX size or such), plus maybe add a comment to the sscanf() line 
>> that this is safe because strlen(name) >= strlen(line).
> 
> Sounds reasonable. Patch (which applies on top of the five patches for
> selftests/x86 I sent out earlier today) is attached.
> 
> Thanks,
> 	Dominik
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vdso.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vdso.c
> index 558c8207e7b9..7ade625f10ed 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vdso.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vdso.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@
>  # endif
>  #endif
>  
> +/* max length of lines in /proc/self/maps - anything longer is skipped here */
> +#define MAPS_LINE_LEN 128
> +
>  int nerrs = 0;
>  
>  typedef long (*getcpu_t)(unsigned *, unsigned *, void *);
> @@ -37,17 +40,19 @@ static void *vsyscall_getcpu(void)
>  {
>  #ifdef __x86_64__
>  	FILE *maps;
> -	char line[128];
> +	char line[MAPS_LINE_LEN];
>  	bool found = false;
>  
>  	maps = fopen("/proc/self/maps", "r");
>  	if (!maps) /* might still be present, but ignore it here, as we test vDSO not vsyscall */
>  		return NULL;
>  
> -	while (fgets(line, sizeof(line), maps)) {
> +	while (fgets(line, MAPS_LINE_LEN, maps)) {
>  		char r, x;
>  		void *start, *end;
> -		char name[128];
> +		char name[MAPS_LINE_LEN];
> +
> +		/* sscanf is safe here as strlen(name) >= strlen(line) */
>  		if (sscanf(line, "%p-%p %c-%cp %*x %*x:%*x %*u %s",
>  			   &start, &end, &r, &x, name) != 5)
>  			continue;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
> index 7a744fa7b786..ee92e4727f18 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,9 @@
>  # endif
>  #endif
>  
> +/* max length of lines in /proc/self/maps - anything longer is skipped here */
> +#define MAPS_LINE_LEN 128
> +
>  static void sethandler(int sig, void (*handler)(int, siginfo_t *, void *),
>  		       int flags)
>  {
> @@ -98,7 +101,7 @@ static int init_vsys(void)
>  #ifdef __x86_64__
>  	int nerrs = 0;
>  	FILE *maps;
> -	char line[128];
> +	char line[MAPS_LINE_LEN];
>  	bool found = false;
>  
>  	maps = fopen("/proc/self/maps", "r");
> @@ -108,10 +111,12 @@ static int init_vsys(void)
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> -	while (fgets(line, sizeof(line), maps)) {
> +	while (fgets(line, MAPS_LINE_LEN, maps)) {
>  		char r, x;
>  		void *start, *end;
> -		char name[128];
> +		char name[MAPS_LINE_LEN];
> +
> +		/* sscanf is safe here as strlen(name) >= strlen(line) */
>  		if (sscanf(line, "%p-%p %c-%cp %*x %*x:%*x %*u %s",
>  			   &start, &end, &r, &x, name) != 5)
>  			continue;
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-12 17:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-11 11:10 [PATCH 0/5] selftests/x86: fixes for !CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION and vsyscall=none Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10 ` [PATCH 1/5] selftests/x86: 5lvl test has been moved Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 12:13   ` [tip:x86/urgent] selftests/x86: Fix build bug caused by the 5lvl test which has been moved to the VM directory tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-13  9:05   ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10 ` [PATCH 2/5] selftests/x86: fix vDSO selftest segfault for vsyscall=none Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:21   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-11 12:17     ` Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 13:00       ` Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 18:24         ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-11 20:59           ` [PATCH] selftests/x86: clarify that there is no buffer overflow on sscanf usage Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-12 17:58             ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2018-02-13  9:04             ` [tip:x86/pti] selftests/x86: Clean up and document sscanf() usage tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-13  9:04   ` [tip:x86/pti] selftests/x86: Fix vDSO selftest segfault for vsyscall=none tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10 ` [PATCH 3/5] selftests/x86: do not rely on int $0x80 in test_mremap_vdso.c Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 12:13   ` [tip:x86/urgent] selftests/x86: Do not rely on "int $0x80" " tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-13  9:06   ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10 ` [PATCH 4/5] selftests/x86: do not rely on int $0x80 in single_step_syscall.c Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 12:14   ` [tip:x86/urgent] selftests/x86: Do not rely on "int $0x80" " tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-13  9:06   ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2018-02-15  0:25   ` tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10 ` [PATCH 5/5] selftests/x86: disable tests requiring 32bit support on pure 64bit systems Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 12:14   ` [tip:x86/urgent] selftests/x86: Disable tests requiring 32-bit support on pure 64-bit systems tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-13  9:07   ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2018-02-15  0:25   ` tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=14b56564-cfa0-e6aa-7f5d-57431be7eb03@kernel.org \
    --to=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuahkh@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome