mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@virtuozzo.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] selftests/x86: do not rely on int $0x80 in single_step_syscall.c
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 12:10:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180211111013.16888-5-linux@dominikbrodowski.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180211111013.16888-1-linux@dominikbrodowski.net>

On 64bit builds, we should not rely on int $0x80 working (it only does if
CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION is enabled). To keep the "Set TF and check int80"
test running on 64bit installs with CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION enabled, build
this test only if we can also build 32bit binaries (which should be a
good approximation for that).

CC: Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@virtuozzo.com>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile              | 2 ++
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/single_step_syscall.c | 5 ++++-
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile
index ce2615a2d105..371ae715c506 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile
@@ -40,12 +40,14 @@ endef
 ifeq ($(CAN_BUILD_I386),1)
 all: all_32
 TEST_PROGS += $(BINARIES_32)
+EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DCAN_BUILD_32
 $(foreach t,$(TARGETS_C_32BIT_ALL),$(eval $(call gen-target-rule-32,$(t))))
 endif
 
 ifeq ($(CAN_BUILD_X86_64),1)
 all: all_64
 TEST_PROGS += $(BINARIES_64)
+EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DCAN_BUILD_64
 $(foreach t,$(TARGETS_C_64BIT_ALL),$(eval $(call gen-target-rule-64,$(t))))
 endif
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/single_step_syscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/single_step_syscall.c
index a48da95c18fd..ddfdd635de16 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/single_step_syscall.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/single_step_syscall.c
@@ -119,7 +119,9 @@ static void check_result(void)
 
 int main()
 {
+#ifdef CAN_BUILD_32
 	int tmp;
+#endif
 
 	sethandler(SIGTRAP, sigtrap, 0);
 
@@ -139,12 +141,13 @@ int main()
 		      : : "c" (post_nop) : "r11");
 	check_result();
 #endif
-
+#ifdef CAN_BUILD_32
 	printf("[RUN]\tSet TF and check int80\n");
 	set_eflags(get_eflags() | X86_EFLAGS_TF);
 	asm volatile ("int $0x80" : "=a" (tmp) : "a" (SYS_getpid)
 			: INT80_CLOBBERS);
 	check_result();
+#endif
 
 	/*
 	 * This test is particularly interesting if fast syscalls use
-- 
2.16.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-11 11:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-11 11:10 [PATCH 0/5] selftests/x86: fixes for !CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION and vsyscall=none Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10 ` [PATCH 1/5] selftests/x86: 5lvl test has been moved Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 12:13   ` [tip:x86/urgent] selftests/x86: Fix build bug caused by the 5lvl test which has been moved to the VM directory tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-13  9:05   ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10 ` [PATCH 2/5] selftests/x86: fix vDSO selftest segfault for vsyscall=none Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:21   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-11 12:17     ` Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 13:00       ` Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 18:24         ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-11 20:59           ` [PATCH] selftests/x86: clarify that there is no buffer overflow on sscanf usage Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-12 17:58             ` Shuah Khan
2018-02-13  9:04             ` [tip:x86/pti] selftests/x86: Clean up and document sscanf() usage tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-13  9:04   ` [tip:x86/pti] selftests/x86: Fix vDSO selftest segfault for vsyscall=none tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10 ` [PATCH 3/5] selftests/x86: do not rely on int $0x80 in test_mremap_vdso.c Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 12:13   ` [tip:x86/urgent] selftests/x86: Do not rely on "int $0x80" " tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-13  9:06   ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2018-02-11 12:14   ` [tip:x86/urgent] selftests/x86: Do not rely on "int $0x80" in single_step_syscall.c tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-13  9:06   ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2018-02-15  0:25   ` tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10 ` [PATCH 5/5] selftests/x86: disable tests requiring 32bit support on pure 64bit systems Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 12:14   ` [tip:x86/urgent] selftests/x86: Disable tests requiring 32-bit support on pure 64-bit systems tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-13  9:07   ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2018-02-15  0:25   ` tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180211111013.16888-5-linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --to=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=dsafonov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome