From: Vincent Brillault <vincent.brillault@cern.ch>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
Geliang Tang <geliangtang@163.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Ivan Delalande <colona@arista.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel/printk/printk.c: Invalid access when buffer wraps around?
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 15:26:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14d57dba-e293-11c2-67b2-18313a3a9b34@cern.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160731084108.GA538@swordfish>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1155 bytes --]
Dear Sergey,
> sorry for long reply. do you see this in practice?
No, I've only thought of the bug will trying to adapt this code to build
a separate cyclic buffer in a dedicated kernel module.
> the first printk()->console_unlock() to notice `seen_seq != log_next_seq`
> will wakeup a task from log_wait, sleeping on
> wait_event_interruptible(seq != log_next_seq)
Yes, but a task could be not waiting to read reading while still having
open /dev/kmsg (e.g. after having read it in O_NONBLOCK)
> so I believe your assumption here is that we wrap around and then fill up
> the log_buf again without waking up the klogd even once, correct?
>
> CPU0 CPU1
>
> console_lock();
> printk();
> ... devkmsg_read();
> printk();
> console_unlock();
>
> like the above?
Mmm, I did not think of such a case, which might be possible. I was more
thinking of a userland daemon reading the buffer (via /dev/kmsg) in
non-blocking mode and only pulling from time to time. I agree that this
is probably not seen often, which could explain why nobody can see it in
practice.
Thanks for your time,
Vincent Brillault
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-31 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-25 9:22 Vincent Brillault
2016-07-31 8:41 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-31 13:26 ` Vincent Brillault [this message]
2016-08-01 16:33 ` Ivan Delalande
2016-08-05 5:14 ` Vincent Brillault
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14d57dba-e293-11c2-67b2-18313a3a9b34@cern.ch \
--to=vincent.brillault@cern.ch \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=colona@arista.com \
--cc=geliangtang@163.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®