From: "johannes.goede@oss.qualcomm.com" <johannes.goede@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: "T, Arun" <arun.t@intel.com>, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>
Cc: "mehdi.djait@linux.intel.com" <mehdi.djait@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-media@vger.kernel.org" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] platform/x86: int3472: Add board data for Intel nvl
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2026 10:22:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14f431a2-3c31-4f23-88dc-7e2d5c8da50d@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SA3PR11MB802248098C161FB7EFB7CB529D7AA@SA3PR11MB8022.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Hi,
On 6-Mar-26 09:47, T, Arun wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> We are using CRD G3 card + ov13b10 (UF and WF), which is supported by Discrete and TPS68470 power solutions.
> WF camera is powered by Discrete and UF camera is powered by TPS68470 PMIC.
> Discrete solution provides regulator name as "avdd".
> TPS68470 provides multiple regulators like "ana". Vdd, dovdd, etc.
>
> As per your comment We have tried below experiments and shared output below:
>
> Experiment 1:
> -Add avdd name as a regulator name.
>
> static struct regulator_consumer_supply int3472_ana_consumer_supplies[] = {
> REGULATOR_SUPPLY("avdd", "i2c-OVTI13B1:00"),
> };
>
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov13b10.c
> @@ -704,7 +704,6 @@ static const char * const ov13b10_supply_names[] = {
> "dovdd", /* Digital I/O power */
> "avdd", /* Analog power */
> "dvdd", /* Digital core power */
> };
>
> Error logs:
> [ 0.732156] tps68470-regulator tps68470-regulator: Failed to set supply avdd
> [ 0.739297] tps68470-regulator tps68470-regulator: error -EBUSY: registering ANA regulator
> [ 0.747663] tps68470-regulator tps68470-regulator: probe with driver tps68470-regulator failed with error -16
> [ 3.621085] intel_ipu7_isys.isys intel_ipu7.isys.40: bind ov13b10 1-0010 nlanes is 2 port is 1
>
> Result:
> Only WF camera sensor is working, which gets the avdd regulator from the discrete solution.
> UF camera gets failed to bind due conflict regulator names.
If you have 2 OVTI13B1 cameras then they will have 2 different
device names, you can see these by doing:
ls /sys/bus/i2c/devices
They will likely be:
"i2c-OVTI13B1:00"
"i2c-OVTI13B1:01"
and since you're getting an error that the discrete INT3472 device
has already registered the "avdd" supply for the "i2c-OVTI13B1:00"
sensor, that means that the tps68470 is likely supplying the
"i2c-OVTI13B1:01" sensor and not the "i2c-OVTI13B1:00" so you
need to have the regulator_consumer_supply maps point to
"i2c-OVTI13B1:01" .
If you boot with "intel_skl_int3472_discrete.dyndbg intel_skl_int3472_common.dyndbg"
add to your kernel commandline then the int3472 code will add
some debug messages to dmesg which let you know which
sensor is mapped to which INT3472:0x device.
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-06 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-30 9:24 [PATCH " Arun T
2026-01-30 9:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] media: i2c: ov13b10: Support tps68470 regulator and gpio Arun T
2026-02-02 15:11 ` johannes.goede
2026-02-17 6:11 ` T, Arun
2026-02-24 18:21 ` T, Arun
2026-02-11 15:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86: int3472: Add board data for Intel nvl Arun T
2026-02-11 15:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] media: i2c: ov13b10: Support tps68470 regulator and gpio Arun T
2026-02-11 16:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86: int3472: Add board data for Intel nvl Arun T
2026-02-11 16:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] media: i2c: ov13b10: Support tps68470 regulator and gpio Arun T
2026-02-26 1:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86: int3472: Add board data for Intel nvl Arun T
2026-02-26 1:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] media: i2c: ov13b10: Support tps68470 regulator and gpio Arun T
2026-02-26 11:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86: int3472: Add board data for Intel nvl Kieran Bingham
2026-02-27 13:35 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Add TPS68470 power supply support for ov13b10 sensor Arun T
2026-02-27 13:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] platform/x86: int3472: Add board data for Intel nvl Arun T
2026-03-01 14:37 ` Sakari Ailus
2026-03-04 9:29 ` johannes.goede
2026-03-06 8:47 ` T, Arun
2026-03-06 9:22 ` johannes.goede [this message]
2026-03-12 9:46 ` T, Arun
2026-03-16 17:57 ` T, Arun
2026-02-27 13:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] media: i2c: ov13b10: Support tps68470 regulator and gpio Arun T
2026-03-01 14:40 ` Sakari Ailus
2026-03-02 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Add TPS68470 power supply support for ov13b10 sensor Arun T
2026-03-02 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] platform/x86: int3472: Add TPS68470 board data for Intel nvl Arun T
2026-03-04 9:32 ` johannes.goede
2026-03-02 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] media: i2c: ov13b10: support tps68470 regulator and gpio Arun T
2026-02-02 15:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86: int3472: Add board data for Intel nvl johannes.goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14f431a2-3c31-4f23-88dc-7e2d5c8da50d@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=johannes.goede@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=arun.t@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mehdi.djait@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome