From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, bp@suse.de,
peterz@infradead.org, Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/amd: Refactor topology extension related code
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 21:00:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1500688839-30247-2-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1500688839-30247-1-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Refactoring in preparation for subsequent changes.
There is no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
index bb5abe8..74d8d7c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
@@ -297,54 +297,63 @@ static int nearby_node(int apicid)
#endif
/*
- * Fixup core topology information for
- * (1) AMD multi-node processors
- * Assumption: Number of cores in each internal node is the same.
- * (2) AMD processors supporting compute units
+ * Get topology information via X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT
*/
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-static void amd_get_topology(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+static void __get_topoext(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
- u8 node_id;
+ u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
- /* get information required for multi-node processors */
- if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT)) {
- u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
+ cpuid(0x8000001e, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
- cpuid(0x8000001e, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+ smp_num_siblings = ((ebx >> 8) & 0xff) + 1;
- node_id = ecx & 0xff;
- smp_num_siblings = ((ebx >> 8) & 0xff) + 1;
+ if (c->x86 == 0x15)
+ c->cu_id = ebx & 0xff;
- if (c->x86 == 0x15)
- c->cu_id = ebx & 0xff;
+ if (c->x86 >= 0x17) {
+ c->cpu_core_id = ebx & 0xff;
- if (c->x86 >= 0x17) {
- c->cpu_core_id = ebx & 0xff;
+ if (smp_num_siblings > 1)
+ c->x86_max_cores /= smp_num_siblings;
+ }
- if (smp_num_siblings > 1)
- c->x86_max_cores /= smp_num_siblings;
- }
+ /*
+ * We may have multiple LLCs if L3 caches exist, so check if we
+ * have an L3 cache by looking at the L3 cache CPUID leaf.
+ */
+ if (cpuid_edx(0x80000006)) {
+ if (c->x86 == 0x17) {
+ /*
+ * LLC is at the core complex level.
+ * Core complex id is ApicId[3].
+ */
+ per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu) = c->apicid >> 3;
+ } else {
+ /* LLC is at the node level. */
+ u8 node_id = ecx & 0xff;
- /*
- * We may have multiple LLCs if L3 caches exist, so check if we
- * have an L3 cache by looking at the L3 cache CPUID leaf.
- */
- if (cpuid_edx(0x80000006)) {
- if (c->x86 == 0x17) {
- /*
- * LLC is at the core complex level.
- * Core complex id is ApicId[3].
- */
- per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu) = c->apicid >> 3;
- } else {
- /* LLC is at the node level. */
- per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu) = node_id;
- }
+ per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu) = node_id;
}
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * Fixup core topology information for
+ * (1) AMD multi-node processors
+ * Assumption: Number of cores in each internal node is the same.
+ * (2) AMD processors supporting compute units
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+static void amd_get_topology(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+{
+ /* get information required for multi-node processors */
+ if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT)) {
+ __get_topoext(c);
} else if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_NODEID_MSR)) {
+ u8 node_id;
u64 value;
+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
rdmsrl(MSR_FAM10H_NODE_ID, value);
node_id = value & 7;
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-22 2:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-22 2:00 [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/amd: Refactor and fixup family17h cpu_core_id Suravee Suthikulpanit
2017-07-22 2:00 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit [this message]
2017-07-22 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/amd: Refactor topology extension related code Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 3:28 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2017-07-24 7:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-23 19:25 ` kbuild test robot
2017-07-22 2:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/amd: Fixup cpu_core_id for family17h downcore configuration Suravee Suthikulpanit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1500688839-30247-2-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--to=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®