mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, bp@suse.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/amd: Fixup cpu_core_id for family17h downcore configuration
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 21:00:39 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1500688839-30247-3-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1500688839-30247-1-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>

For family17h, current cpu_core_id is directly taken from the value
CPUID_Fn8000001E_EBX[7:0] (CoreId), which is the physical ID of the
core within a die. However, on system with downcore configuration
(where not all physical cores within a die are available), this could
result in the case where cpu_core_id > (cores_per_node - 1).

Fix up the cpu_core_id by breaking down the bitfields of CoreId,
and calculate relative ID using available topology information.

Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
index 74d8d7c..d2fbfdf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
@@ -301,36 +301,71 @@ static int nearby_node(int apicid)
  */
 static void __get_topoext(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 {
+	u16 l3_nshared = 0;
 	u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 
+	if (cpuid_edx(0x80000006)) {
+		cpuid_count(0x8000001d, 3, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+		l3_nshared = ((eax >> 14) & 0xfff) + 1;
+	}
+
 	cpuid(0x8000001e, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
 
 	smp_num_siblings = ((ebx >> 8) & 0xff) + 1;
 
-	if (c->x86 == 0x15)
-		c->cu_id = ebx & 0xff;
-
-	if (c->x86 >= 0x17) {
-		c->cpu_core_id = ebx & 0xff;
-
-		if (smp_num_siblings > 1)
-			c->x86_max_cores /= smp_num_siblings;
-	}
+	switch (c->x86) {
+	case 0x17: {
+		u32 tmp, ccx_offset, cpu_offset;
 
-	/*
-	 * We may have multiple LLCs if L3 caches exist, so check if we
-	 * have an L3 cache by looking at the L3 cache CPUID leaf.
-	 */
-	if (cpuid_edx(0x80000006)) {
-		if (c->x86 == 0x17) {
+		/*
+		 * In family 17h, the CPUID_Fn8000001E_EBX[7:0] (CoreId)
+		 * is non-contiguous in downcore and non-SMT cases.
+		 * Fixup the cpu_core_id to be contiguous for cores within
+		 * the die.
+		 */
+		tmp = ebx & 0xff;
+		if (smp_num_siblings == 1) {
 			/*
-			 * LLC is at the core complex level.
-			 * Core complex id is ApicId[3].
+			 * CoreId bit-encoding for SMT-disabled
+			 * [7:4] : die
+			 * [3]   : ccx
+			 * [2:0] : core
 			 */
-			per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu) = c->apicid >> 3;
+			ccx_offset = ((tmp >> 3) & 1) * l3_nshared;
+			cpu_offset = tmp & 7;
 		} else {
-			/* LLC is at the node level. */
+			/*
+			 * CoreId bit-encoding for SMT-enabled
+			 * [7:3] : die
+			 * [2]   : ccx
+			 * [1:0] : core
+			 */
+			ccx_offset = ((tmp >> 2) & 1) * l3_nshared /
+				       smp_num_siblings;
+			cpu_offset = tmp & 3;
+			c->x86_max_cores /= smp_num_siblings;
+
+		}
+		c->cpu_core_id = ccx_offset + cpu_offset;
+
+		/*
+		 * Family17h L3 cache (LLC) is at Core Complex (CCX).
+		 * There could be multiple CCXs in a node.
+		 * CCX ID is ApicId[3].
+		 */
+		per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu) = c->apicid >> 3;
+
+		pr_debug("Fixup coreid:%#x to cpu_core_id:%#x\n",
+			 tmp, c->cpu_core_id);
+		break;
+	}
+	case 0x15:
+		c->cu_id = ebx & 0xff;
+		/* Follow through */
+	default:
+		/* LLC is default to L3, which generally per-node */
+		if (l3_nshared > 0) {
 			u8 node_id = ecx & 0xff;
 
 			per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu) = node_id;
-- 
2.7.4

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-07-22  2:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-22  2:00 [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/amd: Refactor and fixup family17h cpu_core_id Suravee Suthikulpanit
2017-07-22  2:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/amd: Refactor topology extension related code Suravee Suthikulpanit
2017-07-22 16:12   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24  3:28     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2017-07-24  7:15       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-23 19:25   ` kbuild test robot
2017-07-22  2:00 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1500688839-30247-3-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --to=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®