From: anshuman.gupta@intel.com
To: mathias.nyman@intel.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] usb: reducing an usb-port auto-resume latency.
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 11:48:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1503469131-10838-1-git-send-email-anshuman.gupta@intel.com> (raw)
From: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
This patch will improve the variable auto-resume latency of an usb-port.
When xhci gets a port status change event interrupt due to PORT_PLC
(port link state transition), linux Host controller driver drives the
resume signalling on the bus for the amount of time defined by
USB_REUME_TIMEOUT(40ms) macro.
This 40ms delay for resume signalling is in acceptable limit, but
it get worse when xhci goes for polling mode in order to detect other
events on its ports and modify rh_timer timer with a variable time out of
1ms to (HZ/4)ms.
drivers/usb/core/hcd.c line 799
mod_timer (&hcd->rh_timer, (jiffies/(HZ/4) + 1) * (HZ/4)).
Due to above variable timeout usb auto-resume latency varies from
40ms to ~300ms.
Log Snippet:
~128ms latency
[ 53.112049] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 12 chg 0000 evt 0000
[ 53.229200] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 12 chg 0000 evt 0004
[ 53.240177] usb 1-2: usb wakeup-resume
[ 53.240195] usb 1-2: finish resume
[ 53.240357] usb usb1-port2: resume, status 0
-----------------------------------------------------------------
~300ms latency
[ 59.946620] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 12 chg 0000 evt 0000
[ 59.979341] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 12 chg 0000 evt 0000
[ 60.229342] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 12 chg 0000 evt 0004
[ 60.251321] usb 1-2: usb wakeup-resume
[ 60.251335] usb 1-2: finish resume
[ 60.251539] usb usb1-port2: resume, status 0
This variable resume latency can be optimized, as in case of PORT_PLC
change event rh_timer has already been modified with USB_RESUME_TIMEOUT
(40ms) delay,leaving the rest to GetPortStatus and started polling for
root hub status (invoking usb_hcd_poll_rh_status).
We can avoid polling as we have already modified rh_timer with
delay of 40ms.
This patch set the HCD_FLAG_POLL_RH to hcd->flags after modification of
rh_timer, and avoids polling of root hub status. so rh_timer can fire
after 40ms and usb device auto-resuem latency will be around 40ms.
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
index cc368ad..3b7349a 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
@@ -1677,9 +1677,14 @@ static void handle_port_status(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
bus_state->resume_done[faked_port_index] = jiffies +
msecs_to_jiffies(USB_RESUME_TIMEOUT);
set_bit(faked_port_index, &bus_state->resuming_ports);
+ /* Do the rest in GetPortStatus after resume time delay.
+ * Avoid polling roothub status before that so that a
+ * usb device auto-resume latency around ~40ms.
+ */
+ set_bit(HCD_FLAG_POLL_RH, &hcd->flags);
mod_timer(&hcd->rh_timer,
bus_state->resume_done[faked_port_index]);
- /* Do the rest in GetPortStatus */
+ bogus_port_status = true;
}
}
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2017-08-23 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-23 6:18 anshuman.gupta [this message]
2017-08-23 7:56 ` Mathias Nyman
2017-08-23 14:30 ` Alan Stern
2017-08-23 16:00 ` Mathias Nyman
2017-08-28 16:34 ` [PATCH v2] USB: xhci: reducing HS port " anshuman.gupta
[not found] ` <20170912055710.GB30093@anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
2017-09-13 6:55 ` Mathias Nyman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1503469131-10838-1-git-send-email-anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--to=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome