mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: anshuman.gupta@intel.com
To: stern@rowland.harvard.edu, mathias.nyman@intel.com,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	anshuman.gupta@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] USB: xhci: reducing HS port auto-resume latency.
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 22:04:41 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1503938081-17387-1-git-send-email-anshuman.gupta@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <599DA6A1.8070801@intel.com>

From: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>

This patch will improve the variable auto-resume latency of an usb-port.

When xhci gets a HS port status change event interrupt due to PORT_PLC
(port link state transition), linux Host controller driver drives the
resume signalling on the bus for the amount of time defined by
USB_RESUME_TIMEOUT(40ms) macro.

This 40ms delay for resume signalling is in acceptable limit, but
it get worse when xhci goes for polling mode in order to detect other
events on its ports and modify rh_timer timer with a variable time out of
1ms to (HZ/4)ms.

drivers/usb/core/hcd.c line 799
mod_timer (&hcd->rh_timer, (jiffies/(HZ/4) + 1) * (HZ/4)).

Due to above variable timeout usb auto-resume latency varies from
40ms to ~300ms(when HZ=1000).

Log Snippet:
~128ms latency
[   53.112049] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 12 chg 0000 evt 0000
[   53.229200] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 12 chg 0000 evt 0004
[   53.240177] usb 1-2: usb wakeup-resume
[   53.240195] usb 1-2: finish resume
[   53.240357] usb usb1-port2: resume, status 0
-----------------------------------------------------------------
~300ms latency
[   59.946620] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 12 chg 0000 evt 0000
[   59.979341] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 12 chg 0000 evt 0000
[   60.229342] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 12 chg 0000 evt 0004
[   60.251321] usb 1-2: usb wakeup-resume
[   60.251335] usb 1-2: finish resume
[   60.251539] usb usb1-port2: resume, status 0

xhci bug behind the higher latency:
When HS port is resuming, xhci passes the resume event to hub event
thread after USB_RESUME_TIMEOUT delay. it modify rh_timer with
USB_RESUME_TIMEOUT delay, and set the polling mode flag and invoke
usb_hcd_poll_rh_status() function manually.
This eventually makes hub event thread to read the HS port status
before it resumes, since polling mode flag is set, host controller driver
modify rh_timer again with (HZ/4)ms delay, This makes hub event thread to
wait for (HZ/4)ms. which causes higher auto-resume latency.

This variable resume latency can be optimized, as in case of HS port
resume event rh_timer has already been modified with USB_RESUME_TIMEOUT
(40ms) delay, leaving the rest to GetPortStatus.
We can avoid calling usb_hcd_poll_rh_status() function manually in case
of HS port resume event.

This patch set the HCD_FLAG_POLL_RH to hcd->flags after modification of
rh_timer, and avoid calling usb_hcd_poll_rh_status(), This makes to call
usb_hcd_poll_rh_status() by rh_timer and passing the HS port resume event
to hub event thread after USB_RESUME_TIMEOUT delay.

Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
---
Changes in v2
	- Make the commit message more clearer.
	- Changing the comment.

 drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
index cc368ad..0bccff1 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
@@ -1677,9 +1677,14 @@ static void handle_port_status(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
 			bus_state->resume_done[faked_port_index] = jiffies +
 				msecs_to_jiffies(USB_RESUME_TIMEOUT);
 			set_bit(faked_port_index, &bus_state->resuming_ports);
+			/* Do the rest in GetPortStatus after resume time delay.
+			 * Avoid calling usb_hcd_poll_rh_status before that,so
+			 * an usb port can auto-resume after resume time delay.
+			 */
+			set_bit(HCD_FLAG_POLL_RH, &hcd->flags);
 			mod_timer(&hcd->rh_timer,
 				  bus_state->resume_done[faked_port_index]);
-			/* Do the rest in GetPortStatus */
+			bogus_port_status = true;
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
2.7.4

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-28 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-23  6:18 [PATCH] usb: reducing an usb-port " anshuman.gupta
2017-08-23  7:56 ` Mathias Nyman
2017-08-23 14:30   ` Alan Stern
2017-08-23 16:00     ` Mathias Nyman
2017-08-28 16:34       ` anshuman.gupta [this message]
     [not found]         ` <20170912055710.GB30093@anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
2017-09-13  6:55           ` [PATCH v2] USB: xhci: reducing HS port " Mathias Nyman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1503938081-17387-1-git-send-email-anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
    --to=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®