From: "Neri, Ricardo" <ricardo.neri@intel.com>
To: "bp@suse.de" <bp@suse.de>
Cc: "dvyukov@google.com" <dvyukov@google.com>,
"mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>,
"adam.buchbinder@gmail.com" <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"keescook@chromium.org" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"slaoub@gmail.com" <slaoub@gmail.com>,
"vbabka@suse.cz" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"Ren, Qiaowei" <qiaowei.ren@intel.com>,
"mhiramat@kernel.org" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"jslaby@suse.cz" <jslaby@suse.cz>,
"thgarnie@google.com" <thgarnie@google.com>,
"cmetcalf@mellanox.com" <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>,
"lstoakes@gmail.com" <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"luto@kernel.org" <luto@kernel.org>,
"Gortmaker, Paul (Wind River)" <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
"shuah@kernel.org" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"acme@redhat.com" <acme@redhat.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"ray.huang@amd.com" <ray.huang@amd.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"colin.king@canonical.com" <colin.king@canonical.com>,
"brgerst@gmail.com" <brgerst@gmail.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
"corbet@lwn.net" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 13/28] x86/insn-eval: Add utility function to get segment descriptor
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 17:39:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1506533917.8901.1.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170926180552.ofu7dij4gik5c33a@pd.tnic>
On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 20:05 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 05:27:54PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> >
> > The segment descriptor contains information that is relevant to how
> > linear
> > addresses need to be computed. It contains the default size of
> > addresses
> > as well as the base address of the segment. Thus, given a segment
> > selector, we ought look at segment descriptor to correctly
> > calculate the
> ^
> to
I will correct this syntax error.
>
> >
> > linear address.
> >
> > In protected mode, the segment selector might indicate a segment
> > descriptor from either the global descriptor table or a local
> > descriptor
> > table. Both cases are considered in this function.
> >
> > This function is a prerequisite for functions in subsequent commits
> > that
> > will obtain the aforementioned attributes of the segment
> > descriptor.
> >
> > Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@intel.com>
> > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> > Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > Cc: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> > Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
> > Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
> > Cc: x86@kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c | 55
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
> > index 86f58ce6c302..9cf2c49afc15 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
> > @@ -6,9 +6,13 @@
> > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > #include <linux/string.h>
> > #include <linux/ratelimit.h>
> > +#include <linux/mmu_context.h>
> > +#include <asm/desc_defs.h>
> > +#include <asm/desc.h>
> > #include <asm/inat.h>
> > #include <asm/insn.h>
> > #include <asm/insn-eval.h>
> > +#include <asm/ldt.h>
> > #include <asm/vm86.h>
> >
> > enum reg_type {
> > @@ -402,6 +406,57 @@ static int get_reg_offset(struct insn *insn,
> > struct pt_regs *regs,
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > + * get_desc() - Obtain address of segment descriptor
> Get segment descriptor.
>
> >
> > + * @sel: Segment selector
> > + *
> > + * Given a segment selector, obtain a pointer to the segment
> > descriptor.
> > + * Both global and local descriptor tables are supported.
> > + *
> > + * Return: pointer to segment descriptor on success. NULL on
> > error.
> > + */
> > +static struct desc_struct *get_desc(unsigned short sel)
> I've simplified this function to be more readable, here's a diff
> ontop.
>
> More specifically, if you flip the logic and move @desc inside the
> if,
> you don't need to have mutex_unlock() twice in there.
>
> And having a local @ldt ptr makes the selector check more readable.
>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
> index 9cf2c49afc15..48af787cb160 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
> @@ -417,24 +417,24 @@ static int get_reg_offset(struct insn *insn,
> struct pt_regs *regs,
> static struct desc_struct *get_desc(unsigned short sel)
> {
> struct desc_ptr gdt_desc = {0, 0};
> - struct desc_struct *desc = NULL;
> unsigned long desc_base;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MODIFY_LDT_SYSCALL
> if ((sel & SEGMENT_TI_MASK) == SEGMENT_LDT) {
> + struct desc_struct *desc = NULL;
> + struct ldt_struct *ldt;
> +
> /* Bits [15:3] contain the index of the desired
> entry. */
> sel >>= 3;
>
> mutex_lock(¤t->active_mm->context.lock);
> - /* The size of the LDT refers to the number of
> entries. */
> - if (!current->active_mm->context.ldt ||
> - sel >= current->active_mm->context.ldt-
> >nr_entries) {
> - mutex_unlock(¤t->active_mm-
> >context.lock);
> - return NULL;
> - }
>
> - desc = ¤t->active_mm->context.ldt-
> >entries[sel];
> + ldt = current->active_mm->context.ldt;
> + if (ldt && sel < ldt->nr_entries)
> + desc = &ldt->entries[sel];
> +
> mutex_unlock(¤t->active_mm->context.lock);
> +
> return desc;
> }
> #endif
> @@ -452,8 +452,7 @@ static struct desc_struct *get_desc(unsigned
> short sel)
> if (desc_base > gdt_desc.size)
> return NULL;
>
> - desc = (struct desc_struct *)(gdt_desc.address + desc_base);
> - return desc;
> + return (struct desc_struct *)(gdt_desc.address + desc_base);
I have incorporated these changes in my code.
Thanks and BR,
Ricardo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-27 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-19 0:27 [PATCH v8 00/28] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19 0:27 ` [PATCH v8 01/28] x86/mm: Relocate page fault error codes to traps.h Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19 0:27 ` [PATCH v8 02/28] x86/boot: Relocate definition of the initial state of CR0 Ricardo Neri
2017-08-25 17:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-31 4:04 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-08-31 9:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-02 17:35 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19 0:27 ` [PATCH v8 03/28] ptrace,x86: Make user_64bit_mode() available to 32-bit builds Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19 0:27 ` [PATCH v8 04/28] uprobes/x86: Use existing definitions for segment override prefixes Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19 0:27 ` [PATCH v8 05/28] x86/mpx: Use signed variables to compute effective addresses Ricardo Neri
2017-08-29 16:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-31 4:19 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-08-31 9:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-19 0:27 ` [PATCH v8 06/28] x86/mpx: Do not use SIB.index if its value is 100b and ModRM.mod is not 11b Ricardo Neri
2017-08-31 19:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-02 17:19 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19 0:27 ` [PATCH v8 07/28] x86/mpx: Do not use SIB.base if its value is 101b and ModRM.mod = 0 Ricardo Neri
2017-09-06 15:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-19 0:27 ` [PATCH v8 08/28] x86/mpx, x86/insn: Relocate insn util functions to a new insn-eval file Ricardo Neri
2017-09-06 15:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-06 19:27 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19 0:27 ` [PATCH v8 09/28] x86/insn-eval: Do not BUG on invalid register type Ricardo Neri
2017-09-07 17:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-07 20:27 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19 0:27 ` [PATCH v8 10/28] x86/insn-eval: Add a utility function to get register offsets Ricardo Neri
2017-09-08 13:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-14 18:30 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19 0:27 ` [PATCH v8 11/28] x86/insn-eval: Add utility function to identify string instructions Ricardo Neri
2017-09-08 13:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-14 18:30 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19 0:27 ` [PATCH v8 12/28] x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get segment selector Ricardo Neri
2017-09-26 10:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-27 4:21 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-09-27 11:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-27 22:32 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-09-28 9:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-29 6:06 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-09-29 11:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-04 16:47 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19 0:27 ` [PATCH v8 13/28] x86/insn-eval: Add utility function to get segment descriptor Ricardo Neri
2017-09-26 18:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-27 17:39 ` Neri, Ricardo [this message]
2017-08-19 0:27 ` [PATCH v8 14/28] x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get segment descriptor base address and limit Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19 0:27 ` [PATCH v8 15/28] x86/insn-eval: Add function to get default params of code segment Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19 0:27 ` [PATCH v8 16/28] x86/insn-eval: Indicate a 32-bit displacement if ModRM.mod is 0 and ModRM.rm is 101b Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19 0:27 ` [PATCH v8 17/28] x86/insn-eval: Incorporate segment base in linear address computation Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19 0:27 ` [PATCH v8 18/28] x86/insn-eval: Add support to resolve 32-bit address encodings Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19 0:28 ` [PATCH v8 19/28] x86/insn-eval: Add wrapper function for 32 and 64-bit addresses Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19 0:28 ` [PATCH v8 20/28] x86/insn-eval: Handle 32-bit address encodings in virtual-8086 mode Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19 0:28 ` [PATCH v8 21/28] x86/insn-eval: Add support to resolve 16-bit addressing encodings Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19 0:28 ` [PATCH v8 22/28] x86/cpufeature: Add User-Mode Instruction Prevention definitions Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19 0:28 ` [PATCH v8 23/28] x86: Add emulation code for UMIP instructions Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19 0:28 ` [PATCH v8 24/28] x86/umip: Force a page fault when unable to copy emulated result to user Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19 0:28 ` [PATCH v8 25/28] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19 0:28 ` [PATCH v8 26/28] x86/traps: Fixup general protection faults caused by UMIP Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19 0:28 ` [PATCH v8 27/28] selftests/x86: Add tests for User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19 0:28 ` [PATCH v8 28/28] selftests/x86: Add tests for instruction str and sldt Ricardo Neri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1506533917.8901.1.camel@intel.com \
--to=ricardo.neri@intel.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=adam.buchbinder@gmail.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@mellanox.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qiaowei.ren@intel.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=slaoub@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thgarnie@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome