From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/16] doc: Fix tree.c bulleted lists in docbook comment headers
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 14:21:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507152086-9791-14-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171004212051.GA8411@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 0c44c7b42e6d..48ded4c4055b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3097,9 +3097,10 @@ __call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func,
* read-side critical sections have completed. call_rcu_sched() assumes
* that the read-side critical sections end on enabling of preemption
* or on voluntary preemption.
- * RCU read-side critical sections are delimited by :
- * - rcu_read_lock_sched() and rcu_read_unlock_sched(), OR
- * - anything that disables preemption.
+ * RCU read-side critical sections are delimited by:
+ *
+ * - rcu_read_lock_sched() and rcu_read_unlock_sched(), OR
+ * - anything that disables preemption.
*
* These may be nested.
*
@@ -3124,11 +3125,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu_sched);
* handler. This means that read-side critical sections in process
* context must not be interrupted by softirqs. This interface is to be
* used when most of the read-side critical sections are in softirq context.
- * RCU read-side critical sections are delimited by :
- * - rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock(), if in interrupt context.
- * OR
- * - rcu_read_lock_bh() and rcu_read_unlock_bh(), if in process context.
- * These may be nested.
+ * RCU read-side critical sections are delimited by:
+ *
+ * - rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock(), if in interrupt context, OR
+ * - rcu_read_lock_bh() and rcu_read_unlock_bh(), if in process context.
+ *
+ * These may be nested.
*
* See the description of call_rcu() for more detailed information on
* memory ordering guarantees.
--
2.5.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-04 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-04 21:20 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/16] Documentation updates for v4.15 Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-04 21:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/16] documentation: RCU grace-period memory ordering guarantees Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-04 21:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/16] documentation: Long-running irq handlers can stall RCU grace periods Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-04 21:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/16] documentation: Slow systems " Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-04 21:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/16] documentation: Update RCU CPU stall warning messages Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-04 21:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/16] memory-barriers: Replace uses of "transitive" Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-04 21:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/16] memory-barriers: Rework multicopy-atomicity section Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-04 21:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/16] doc: Fix options for RCU options Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-04 21:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/16] doc: Add parameters to rcupdate.h docbook comments Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-04 21:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/16] rcu: Remove extra docbook comment in rculist.h Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-04 21:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/16] rcu: Fix docbook comments for rcu_sync functions Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-04 21:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/16] doc: Fix list and emphasis in rcupdate.h Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-04 21:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/16] doc: Flag code segment in rcu_pointer_handoff()'s docbook header Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-04 21:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/16] doc: Fix code display in rcu_pointer_handoff()'s docbook comment Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-04 21:21 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2017-10-04 21:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/16] memory-barriers.txt: Fix typo in pairing example Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-04 21:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/16] Documentation: rewrite confusing statement about memory barriers Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1507152086-9791-14-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®