From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Wanpeng Li" <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] KVM: LAPIC: Rework lapic timer to behave more like real-hardware
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 03:53:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507200833-20434-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> (raw)
The issue is reported in xen community.
Anthony PERARD pointed out:
https://www.mail-archive.com/xen-devel@lists.xen.org/msg117283.html#
| When developing PVH for OVMF, I've used the lapic timer. It turns out that the
| way it is used by OVMF did not work with Xen [1]. I tried to find out how
| real-hw behave, and write a XTF tests [2]. And this patch series tries to fix
| the behavior of the vlapic timer.
|
|
| The OVMF driver for the APIC timer initialize the timer like this:
| write to TMICT (initial counter)
| write to TMDCR (divide configuration)
| enable the timer (this may change timer mode from one-shot to periodic)
| It turns out that TMICT is set to 0 on the last step, but OVMF expect the timer
| to run.
|
| Here is some description of the APIC timer, base on observation as well as read
| of the Intel SDM. The description is also patch of patch description
| (reworded).
|
| Maybe a way of thinking how the APIC timer is evaluated, is to think of how
| hardward will do it. There is a counter TMCCT which always keeps counting down.
|
| Setting TMICT also set TMCCT, nothing else matter.
| Setting LVTT does not change anything right away.
| Setting TMDCR does not change much.
|
| Now TMCCT keeps counting down, by a value related to TMDCR.
| Once, TMCCT reach 0, it is only at this time that LVTT is taken into account.
| Is there an interrupt to deliver? Should the timer restart counting from the
| value in TMICT?
|
| In the Intel SDM, there is the word "disarm" of the timer used. I guess the
| easier way to disarm the APIC timer (when in periodic or one-shot) is to set
| TMICT to 0. But if we take TSC-Deadline mode out of the picture, there is
| nothing in the manual that say that the timer is disarm or stopped when
| changing timer mode (there is only two modes left, period and one-shot).
|
| As for the TSC-deadline timer mode, observation shown that changing to it (or
| from it) does reset and disarm both timers, so effectively TMICT and the
| tscdeadline are set to 0.
|
| [1] https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-12/msg00959.html
| [2] v1:
| https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-03/msg02533.html
| v2: look for "[XTF PATCH V2 0/3] Testing vlapic timer"
v2 -> v3:
* move the write 0 to APIC_TMICT logic to apic_update_lvtt()
* skip hrtimer_cancel() in apic_update_lvtt() when either from one-shot mode to
periodic or vice versa.
v1 -> v2:
* add cover-letter and collect recent lapic patches to one patchset
Wanpeng Li (3):
KVM: LAPIC: Fix lapic timer mode transition
KVM: LAPIC: Keep timer running when switching between one-shot and periodic mode
KVM: LAPIC: Apply change to TDCR right away to the timer
arch/x86/include/asm/apicdef.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2017-10-05 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-05 10:53 Wanpeng Li [this message]
2017-10-05 10:53 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] KVM: LAPIC: Fix lapic timer mode transition Wanpeng Li
2017-10-05 10:53 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] KVM: LAPIC: Keep timer running when switching between one-shot and periodic mode Wanpeng Li
2017-10-05 12:40 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-10-05 12:54 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-10-05 10:53 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] KVM: LAPIC: Apply change to TDCR right away to the timer Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1507200833-20434-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
--to=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®