mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pandruvada, Srinivas" <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"anna-maria@linutronix.de" <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Cc: "jstultz@google.com" <jstultz@google.com>,
	"riel@surriel.com" <riel@surriel.com>,
	"lukasz.luba@arm.com" <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
	"kprateek.nayak@amd.com" <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"frederic@kernel.org" <frederic@kernel.org>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	"paulmck@kernel.org" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	"arjan@infradead.org" <arjan@infradead.org>,
	"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"bigeasy@linutronix.de" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	"ggherdovich@suse.cz" <ggherdovich@suse.cz>,
	"gautham.shenoy@amd.com" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/25] timer: Move from a push remote at enqueue to a pull at expiry model
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 19:34:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <151240c939d02df4979651b84bb99356a938c44d.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231004123454.15691-1-anna-maria@linutronix.de>

Hi Maria,

On Wed, 2023-10-04 at 14:34 +0200, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 

[...]

> 
> The proper solution to this problem is to always queue the timers on
> the
> local CPU and allow the non pinned timers to be pulled onto a busy
> CPU at
> expiry time.

Thanks for these patches. I am looking for saving power during video
playback with our low power daemon. I use cgroup v2 isolation to keep
some CPUs idle (CPU 0-11) and video is played on a single module (CPU
12-15).

I have some kernelshark pictures at below link. The traces are
collected with sched, timer and irq. With 6.6-rc5, you can see some
timers still expires on CPUs which I want to keep idle. With timer
patches added, they are mostly pulled to busy CPU. 

https://imgur.com/a/8nF5OoP

I can share the .dat files, but they are too big to attach here.

Thanks,
Srinivas

> 
> Therefore split the timer storage into local pinned and global
> timers:
> Local pinned timers are always expired on the CPU on which they have
> been
> queued. Global timers can be expired on any CPU.
> 
> As long as a CPU is busy it expires both local and global timers.
> When a
> CPU goes idle it arms for the first expiring local timer. If the
> first
> expiring pinned (local) timer is before the first expiring movable
> timer,
> then no action is required because the CPU will wake up before the
> first
> movable timer expires. If the first expiring movable timer is before
> the
> first expiring pinned (local) timer, then this timer is queued into a
> idle
> timerqueue and eventually expired by some other active CPU.
> 
> To avoid global locking the timerqueues are implemented as a
> hierarchy. The
> lowest level of the hierarchy holds the CPUs. The CPUs are associated
> to
> groups of 8, which are separated per node. If more than one CPU group
> exist, then a second level in the hierarchy collects the groups.
> Depending
> on the size of the system more than 2 levels are required. Each group
> has a
> "migrator" which checks the timerqueue during the tick for remote
> timers to
> be expired.
> 
> If the last CPU in a group goes idle it reports the first expiring
> event in
> the group up to the next group(s) in the hierarchy. If the last CPU
> goes
> idle it arms its timer for the first system wide expiring timer to
> ensure
> that no timer event is missed.
> 
> 
> Testing
> ~~~~~~~
> 
> Enqueue
> ^^^^^^^
> 
> The impact of wasting cycles during enqueue by using the heuristic in
> contrast to always queuing the timer on the local CPU was measured
> with a
> micro benchmark. Therefore a timer is enqueued and dequeued in a loop
> with
> 1000 repetitions on a isolated CPU. The time the loop takes is
> measured. A
> quarter of the remaining CPUs was kept busy. This measurement was
> repeated
> several times. With the patch queue the average duration was reduced
> by
> approximately 25%.
> 
>         145ns   plain v6
>         109ns   v6 with patch queue
> 
> 
> Furthermore the impact of residence in deep idle states of an idle
> system
> was investigated. The patch queue doesn't downgrade this behavior.
> 
> dbench test
> ^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> A dbench test starting X pairs of client servers are used to create
> load on
> the system. The measurable value is the throughput. The tests were
> executed
> on a zen3 machine. The base is the tip tree branch timers/core which
> is
> based on a v6.6-rc1.
> 
> governor menu
> 
> X pairs timers/core     pull-model      impact
> ----------------------------------------------
> 1       353.19 (0.19)   353.45 (0.30)   0.07%
> 2       700.10 (0.96)   687.00 (0.20)   -1.87%
> 4       1329.37 (0.63)  1282.91 (0.64)  -3.49%
> 8       2561.16 (1.28)  2493.56 (1.76)  -2.64%
> 16      4959.96 (0.80)  4914.59 (0.64)  -0.91%
> 32      9741.92 (3.44)  8979.83 (1.13)  -7.82%
> 64      16535.40 (2.84) 16388.47 (4.02) -0.89%
> 128     22136.83 (2.42) 23174.50 (1.43) 4.69%
> 256     39256.77 (4.48) 38994.00 (0.39) -0.67%
> 512     36799.03 (1.83) 38091.10 (0.63) 3.51%
> 1024    32903.03 (0.86) 35370.70 (0.89) 7.50%
> 
> 
> governor teo
> 
> X pairs timers/core     pull-model      impact
> ----------------------------------------------
> 1       350.83 (1.27)   352.45 (0.96)   0.46%
> 2       699.52 (0.85)   690.10 (0.54)   -1.35%
> 4       1339.53 (1.99)  1294.71 (2.71)  -3.35%
> 8       2574.10 (0.76)  2495.46 (1.97)  -3.06%
> 16      4898.50 (1.74)  4783.06 (1.64)  -2.36%
> 32      9115.50 (4.63)  9037.83 (1.58)  -0.85%
> 64      16663.90 (3.80) 16042.00 (1.72) -3.73%
> 128     25044.93 (1.11) 23250.03 (1.08) -7.17%
> 256     38059.53 (1.70) 39658.57 (2.98) 4.20%
> 512     36369.30 (0.39) 38890.13 (0.36) 6.93%
> 1024    33956.83 (1.14) 35514.83 (0.29) 4.59%
> 
> 
> 
> Ping Pong Oberservation
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> During testing on a mostly idle machine a ping pong game could be
> observed:
> a process_timeout timer is expired remotely on a non idle CPU. Then
> the CPU
> where the schedule_timeout() was executed to enqueue the timer comes
> out of
> idle and restarts the timer using schedule_timeout() and goes back to
> idle
> again. This is due to the fair scheduler which tries to keep the task
> on
> the CPU which it previously executed on.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Possible Next Steps
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> Simple deferrable timers are no longer required as they can be
> converted to
> global timers. If a CPU goes idle, a formerly deferrable timer will
> not
> prevent the CPU to sleep as long as possible. Only the last migrator
> CPU
> has to take care of them. Deferrable timers with timer pinned flags
> needs
> to be expired on the specified CPU but must not prevent CPU from
> going
> idle. They require their own timer base which is never taken into
> account
> when calculating the next expiry time. This conversation and required
> cleanup will be done in a follow up series.
> 
> 
> v7..v8:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230524070629.6377-1-anna-maria@linutronix.de
>   - Address review feedback
>   - Move marking timer base idle into tick_nohz_stop_tick()
>   - Look ahead function to determine possible sleep lenght
> 
> 
> v6..v7:
>   - Address review feedback of Frederic and bigeasy
>   - Change lock, unlock fetch next timer interrupt logic after remote
> expiry
>   - Move timer_expire_remote() into tick-internal.h
>   - Add documentation section about "Required event and timerqueue
> update
>     after remote expiry"
>   - Fix fallout of kernel test robot
> 
> 
> v5..v6:
> 
>   - Address review of Frederic Weisbecker and Peter Zijlstra
> (spelling,
>     locking, race in tmigr_handle_remote_cpu())
> 
>   - unconditionally set TIMER_PINNED flag in add_timer_on();
> introduce
>     add_timer() variants which set/unset TIMER_PINNED flag; drop
> fixing
>     add_timer_on() call sites, as TIMER_PINNED flag is set
> implicitly;
>     Fixing workqueue to use add_timer_global() instead of simply
>     add_timer() for unbound work.
> 
>   - Drop support for siblings to end up in the same level 0 group
> (could be
>     added again in a better way as an improvement later on)
> 
>   - Do not send IPI for new first deferrable timers
> 
> v4..v5:
>   - address review feedback of Frederic Weisbecker
>   - fix issue with group timer update after remote expiry
> 
> v3..v4:
>   - address review feedback of Frederic Weisbecker
>   - address kernel test robot fallout
>   - Move patch 16 "add_timer_on(): Make sure callers have
> TIMER_PINNED
>     flag" at the begin of the queue to prevent timers to end up in
> global
>     timer base when they were queued using add_timer_on()
>   - Fix some comments and typos
> 
> v2..v3:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20170418111102.490432548@linutronix.de/
>   - Minimize usage of locks by storing data using atomic_cmpxchg()
> for
>     migrator information and information about active cpus.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>         Anna-Maria
> 
> 
> 
> Anna-Maria Behnsen (22):
>   tick/sched: Cleanup confusing variables
>   tick-sched: Warn when next tick seems to be in the past
>   timer: Do not IPI for deferrable timers
>   timer: Move store of next event into __next_timer_interrupt()
>   timers: Clarify check in forward_timer_base()
>   timers: Split out forward timer base functionality
>   timers: Use already existing function for forwarding timer base
>   timer: Split out get next timer functionality
>   timers: Move marking timer bases idle into tick_nohz_stop_tick()
>   timers: Introduce add_timer() variants which modify timer flags
>   workqueue: Use global variant for add_timer()
>   timer: add_timer_on(): Make sure TIMER_PINNED flag is set
>   timers: Ease code in run_local_timers()
>   timer: Split next timer interrupt logic
>   timer: Keep the pinned timers separate from the others
>   timer: Retrieve next expiry of pinned/non-pinned timers separately
>   timer: Split out "get next timer interrupt" functionality
>   timer: Add get next timer interrupt functionality for remote CPUs
>   timer: Check if timers base is handled already
>   timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model
>   timer_migration: Add tracepoints
>   timer: Always queue timers on the local CPU
> 
> Richard Cochran (linutronix GmbH) (2):
>   timer: Restructure internal locking
>   tick/sched: Split out jiffies update helper function
> 
> Thomas Gleixner (1):
>   timer: Rework idle logic
> 
>  include/linux/cpuhotplug.h             |    1 +
>  include/linux/timer.h                  |   16 +-
>  include/trace/events/timer_migration.h |  283 ++++
>  kernel/time/Makefile                   |    3 +
>  kernel/time/tick-internal.h            |   13 +
>  kernel/time/tick-sched.c               |   69 +-
>  kernel/time/timer.c                    |  514 ++++++--
>  kernel/time/timer_migration.c          | 1636
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/time/timer_migration.h          |  144 +++
>  kernel/workqueue.c                     |    2 +-
>  10 files changed, 2549 insertions(+), 132 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 include/trace/events/timer_migration.h
>  create mode 100644 kernel/time/timer_migration.c
>  create mode 100644 kernel/time/timer_migration.h
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-11 19:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-04 12:34 Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH v8 01/25] tick/sched: Cleanup confusing variables Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-05  9:44   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH v8 02/25] tick-sched: Warn when next tick seems to be in the past Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH v8 03/25] timer: Do not IPI for deferrable timers Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH v8 04/25] timer: Move store of next event into __next_timer_interrupt() Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH v8 05/25] timers: Clarify check in forward_timer_base() Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-05 10:17   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-16  8:11     ` Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH v8 06/25] timers: Split out forward timer base functionality Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-06 11:16   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH v8 07/25] timers: Use already existing function for forwarding timer base Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-06 11:17   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH v8 08/25] timer: Rework idle logic Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-09 22:15   ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-10 11:19     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-10 11:48       ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH v8 09/25] timer: Split out get next timer functionality Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-09 21:15   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-09 22:24     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 22:17   ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH v8 10/25] timers: Move marking timer bases idle into tick_nohz_stop_tick() Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-12 15:52   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-19 13:37     ` Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH v8 11/25] timers: Introduce add_timer() variants which modify timer flags Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH v8 12/25] workqueue: Use global variant for add_timer() Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH v8 13/25] timer: add_timer_on(): Make sure TIMER_PINNED flag is set Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH v8 14/25] timers: Ease code in run_local_timers() Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH v8 15/25] timer: Split next timer interrupt logic Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH v8 16/25] timer: Keep the pinned timers separate from the others Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH v8 17/25] timer: Retrieve next expiry of pinned/non-pinned timers separately Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH v8 18/25] timer: Split out "get next timer interrupt" functionality Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH v8 19/25] timer: Add get next timer interrupt functionality for remote CPUs Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH v8 20/25] timer: Restructure internal locking Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH v8 21/25] timer: Check if timers base is handled already Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH v8 22/25] tick/sched: Split out jiffies update helper function Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH v8 23/25] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH v8 24/25] timer_migration: Add tracepoints Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH v8 25/25] timer: Always queue timers on the local CPU Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-06  5:05 ` [PATCH v8 00/25] timer: Move from a push remote at enqueue to a pull at expiry model K Prateek Nayak
2023-10-19 14:14   ` Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-20  9:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-11 19:34 ` Pandruvada, Srinivas [this message]
2023-10-19 13:47   ` Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-12  2:22 ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-10-19 13:55   ` Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-13 11:35 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-10-19 14:04   ` Anna-Maria Behnsen
2023-10-19 14:28     ` Lukasz Luba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=151240c939d02df4979651b84bb99356a938c44d.camel@intel.com \
    --to=srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=ggherdovich@suse.cz \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®