From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: David Frey <dpfrey@gmail.com>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Subject: Re: Seeking guidance on spelling fixes
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 09:15:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1518974138.1894.14.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7912182.YNFVRYok70@roach>
(adding Colin King and Masahiro Yamada, the current
and former spelling correction leading submitters)
On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 07:34 -0800, David Frey wrote:
> I noticed a common spelling mistake in some Linux kernel code that I was
> reading the other day and it made me wonder how prevalent common spelling
> mistakes are in the kernel. I did some grepping and it seems that there
> are a large number of spelling mistakes. I did a bit of searching and I
> found (http://www.kegel.com/kerspell/) which includes some comments/tools
> relating to spelling and the Linux kernel.
>
> I have gone ahead and corrected about 100 total instances based on 25
> common misspellings. There are many, many more common misspellings that I
> could check, but I don't want to sink more time into this if the changes
> won't be accepted.
>
> Is this type of change likely to be accepted?
Yes. Mostly. Slowly.
> Right now I am making
> individual git commits for each correction. For example "aditional ->
> additional".
That's best.
> I am trying to only correct true misspellings. I'm not trying to choose
> the "most correct" spelling for cases where there are acceptable alternate
> spellings.
Right. Please do not change Britishisms<->Americanisms
> I've pushed the changes I have made so far to a "spelling_fixes" branch
> here: https://github.com/dpfrey/linux/commits/spelling_fixes just in case
> there is any question about what I am doing based on the above description.
>
> Just to be clear, I'm not trying to get this portion of the work merged at
> this point. I'm trying to get a feel for whether I should keep working on
> this.
About half a year ago, these were the most frequent
typos checkpatch's spelling test found:
98 'prefered' may be misspelled - perhaps 'preferred'?
85 'occured' may be misspelled - perhaps 'occurred'?
61 'endianess' may be misspelled - perhaps 'endianness'?
60 'childs' may be misspelled - perhaps 'children'?
53 'Interrup' may be misspelled - perhaps 'Interrupt'?
51 'transfered' may be misspelled - perhaps 'transferred'?
49 'TRESHOLD' may be misspelled - perhaps 'THRESHOLD'?
48 'trun' may be misspelled - perhaps 'turn'?
45 'commited' may be misspelled - perhaps 'committed'?
41 'capabilites' may be misspelled - perhaps 'capabilities'?
39 'sucess' may be misspelled - perhaps 'success'?
39 'preemptable' may be misspelled - perhaps 'preemptible'?
38 'struc' may be misspelled - perhaps 'struct'?
35 'overriden' may be misspelled - perhaps 'overridden'?
34 'CONTINOUS' may be misspelled - perhaps 'CONTINUOUS'?
33 'programm' may be misspelled - perhaps 'program'?
31 'splitted' may be misspelled - perhaps 'split'?
30 'PALLETTE' may be misspelled - perhaps 'PALETTE'?
28 'SUPPORED' may be misspelled - perhaps 'SUPPORTED'?
28 'interupt' may be misspelled - perhaps 'interrupt'?
28 'adress' may be misspelled - perhaps 'address'?
27 'timout' may be misspelled - perhaps 'timeout'?
27 'calle' may be misspelled - perhaps 'called'?
26 'ASSIGMENT' may be misspelled - perhaps 'ASSIGNMENT'?
26 'alow' may be misspelled - perhaps 'allow'?
23 'seperate' may be misspelled - perhaps 'separate'?
23 'dependant' may be misspelled - perhaps 'dependent'?
23 'accomodate' may be misspelled - perhaps 'accommodate'?
22 'specifc' may be misspelled - perhaps 'specific'?
22 'continous' may be misspelled - perhaps 'continuous'?
22 'beeing' may be misspelled - perhaps 'being'?
21 'retrive' may be misspelled - perhaps 'retrieve'?
21 'paramaters' may be misspelled - perhaps 'parameters'?
21 'ouput' may be misspelled - perhaps 'output'?
21 'ment' may be misspelled - perhaps 'meant'?
21 'avaiable' may be misspelled - perhaps 'available'?
21 'Acknowledgement' may be misspelled - perhaps 'Acknowledgment'?
20 'wether' may be misspelled - perhaps 'whether'?
20 'changable' may be misspelled - perhaps 'changeable'?
19 'reseting' may be misspelled - perhaps 'resetting'?
19 'orignal' may be misspelled - perhaps 'original'?
18 'managment' may be misspelled - perhaps 'management'?
18 'lenght' may be misspelled - perhaps 'length'?
17 'UNDERUN' may be misspelled - perhaps 'UNDERRUN'?
17 'syncronized' may be misspelled - perhaps 'synchronized'?
17 'singal' may be misspelled - perhaps 'signal'?
17 'paramters' may be misspelled - perhaps 'parameters'?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-18 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-18 15:34 David Frey
2018-02-18 17:00 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-02-18 17:15 ` Joe Perches [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1518974138.1894.14.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=dpfrey@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®