From: David Wang <davidwang@zhaoxin.com>
To: <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, <mingo@kernel.org>, <len.brown@intel.com>,
<pavel@ucw.cz>, <tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<hpa@zytor.com>, <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-pm@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <brucechang@via-alliance.com>, <cooperyan@zhaoxin.com>,
<qiyuanwang@zhaoxin.com>, <benjaminpan@viatech.com>,
<lukelin@viacpu.com>, <timguo@zhaoxin.com>,
David Wang <davidwang@zhaoxin.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] Optimize C3 entry on Centaur CPUs
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 10:02:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1522375359-30370-1-git-send-email-davidwang@zhaoxin.com> (raw)
For new Centaur CPUs the ucode will take care of the preservation of
cache coherence between CPU cores in C-states and the other CPU cores
regardless of how deep the C-states are, so it is not necessary to
flush the caches in software before entering C3.
Signed-off-by: David Wang <davidwang@zhaoxin.com>
Changes from v1 to v2:
* 1, Add some Family/Model/Stepping contrains to let this patch only apply
* to new centaur CPUs.
* 2, The arbiter disable/enable operations maybe needed for old VIA/Centaur
* platform. So, delete "flags->bm_control=0" in patch v1.
---
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
index dde437f..d92a7f3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
@@ -51,6 +51,16 @@ void acpi_processor_power_init_bm_check(struct acpi_processor_flags *flags,
if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL &&
(c->x86 > 0xf || (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model >= 0x0f)))
flags->bm_control = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * For all recent Centaur CPUs, the ucode will make sure that each core can keep
+ * cache coherence with each other while entering C3 type state.
+ * So, set bm_check to 1 to indicate that the kernel need not execute a cache
+ * flush operation (WBINVD) when entering C3 type state.
+ */
+ if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR &&
+ (c->x86 > 6 || (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x0f && c->x86_mask>=0x0e)))
+ flags->bm_check = 1;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_processor_power_init_bm_check);
--
1.9.1
reply other threads:[~2018-03-30 2:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1522375359-30370-1-git-send-email-davidwang@zhaoxin.com \
--to=davidwang@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=benjaminpan@viatech.com \
--cc=brucechang@via-alliance.com \
--cc=cooperyan@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@kernel.org \
--cc=lukelin@viacpu.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=qiyuanwang@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=timguo@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®