From: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>,
Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr>,
Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] locking: Document the semantics of spin_is_locked()
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2018 18:41:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1522600912-6208-2-git-send-email-andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1522600912-6208-1-git-send-email-andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
There appeared to be a certain, recurrent uncertainty concerning the
semantics of spin_is_locked(), likely a consequence of the fact that
this semantics remains undocumented or that it has been historically
linked to the (likewise unclear) semantics of spin_unlock_wait().
A recent auditing [1] of the callers of the primitive confirmed that
none of them are relying on particular ordering guarantees; document
this semantics by adding a docbook header to spin_is_locked().
[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151981440005264&w=2
Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>
Cc: Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/spinlock.h | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/spinlock.h b/include/linux/spinlock.h
index 4894d322d2584..2639fdc9a916c 100644
--- a/include/linux/spinlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/spinlock.h
@@ -380,6 +380,17 @@ static __always_inline int spin_trylock_irq(spinlock_t *lock)
raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(spinlock_check(lock), flags); \
})
+/**
+ * spin_is_locked() - Check whether a spinlock is locked.
+ * @lock: Pointer to the spinlock.
+ *
+ * This function is NOT required to provide any memory ordering
+ * guarantees; it could be used for debugging purposes or, when
+ * additional synchronization is needed, accompanied with other
+ * constructs (memory barriers) enforcing the synchronization.
+ *
+ * Return: 1, if @lock is (found to be) locked; 0, otherwise.
+ */
static __always_inline int spin_is_locked(spinlock_t *lock)
{
return raw_spin_is_locked(&lock->rlock);
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-01 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-01 16:41 [PATCH v3 0/3] Changes, clean-ups and documentation for spin_is_locked() Andrea Parri
2018-04-01 16:41 ` Andrea Parri [this message]
2018-04-02 14:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] locking: Document the semantics of spin_is_locked() Alan Stern
2018-04-02 19:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-06 19:47 ` [PATCH v4 " Andrea Parri
2018-04-06 21:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-06 21:01 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-04-06 21:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-06 21:08 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-04-06 21:58 ` Andrea Parri
2018-04-08 21:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-08 21:32 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-04-08 22:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-01 16:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: Remove smp_mb() from arch_spin_is_locked() Andrea Parri
2018-04-01 16:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] locking: Clean up comment and #ifndef for {,queued_}spin_is_locked() Andrea Parri
2018-04-01 18:24 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Changes, clean-ups and documentation for spin_is_locked() Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-03 12:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] locking: Document the semantics of spin_is_locked() David Howells
2018-04-03 13:35 ` Andrea Parri
2018-04-03 13:52 ` David Howells
2018-04-03 14:07 ` Andrea Parri
2018-04-03 14:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-03 14:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-03 15:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-03 16:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-03 15:23 ` David Howells
2018-04-03 19:31 ` Andrea Parri
2018-04-03 20:04 ` Alan Stern
2018-04-03 21:43 ` David Howells
2018-04-03 21:47 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-04-04 12:47 ` Andrea Parri
2018-04-04 21:22 ` David Howells
2018-04-05 7:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-05 8:56 ` Andrea Parri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1522600912-6208-2-git-send-email-andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com \
--to=andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®