mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nanzhe Zhao" <nzzhao@126.com>
To: "Jaegeuk Kim" <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: "Nanzhe Zhao" <nzzhao.sigma@gmail.com>,
	"Barry Song" <baohua@kernel.org>,
	"Nanzhe Zhao" <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>,
	"Juan Yescas" <jyescas@google.com>,
	"Daeho Jeong" <daehojeong@google.com>,
	"Dev Jain" <Dev.Jain@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"David Hildenbrand" <David.Hildenbrand@arm.com>,
	"Pengfei Li" <lipengfei28@xiaomi.com>,
	"Bo Zhang" <zhangbo56@xiaomi.com>,
	"Kalesh Singh" <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
	"Ryan Roberts" <Ryan.Roberts@arm.com>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re:Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v5 00/16] f2fs: support & optimize large folios for writable files
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2026 18:00:47 +0800 (CST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15373a26.1e3d.1a1494e8d1a.Coremail.nzzhao@126.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <atFFXafuVyyimmUk@google.com>




Hi Jaeguk,
  
  I am trying to reproduce the failure in your log: sd 0:0:0:4: Retrying unaligned write for zone 2639 → critical target error → sde:
  zone 2639: Aborting plugged BIOs → f2fs_stop_checkpoint (kernel 6.12.81-android16-6) and got two two questions.
  
  1. Kernel baseline. Could you confirm that the kernel you tested has Bart Van Assche's zoned write pipelining, i.e. multiple in-flight
  sequential writes per zone, with the order kept by BLK_FEAT_ORDERED_HWQ and the per-zone from_cpu in block/blk-zoned.c? And that it
  does not include these three follow-up fixes:
  
  - "ANDROID: block: Preserve the submission order of zoned writes"
  - "ANDROID: block: Preserve the order of zoned REQ_FUA writes"
  - "ANDROID: block: Restore the write pointer offset check"
  
  In AOSP they are 050de570f, c616f7c1a, d50601d0f on android16-6.12, and 6068ed9f0, d786f8609, f08430f80 on android17-6.18. The
  simplest check is whether REQ_ZONE_SERIALIZED and work_busy(&zwplug->bio_work) appear in your block/blk-zoned.c. The output of git log
  --oneline -- block/blk-zoned.c would also do.
  
  2. Test workload. If that is the case, could you share the test workload that triggers it?  So far I have not been able to reproduce it using null_blk to simulate 
zone devices with qemu and android17-6.18 gki kernel. Any suggestions would be much appreciated.
Thanks,

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-17 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-14  6:44 Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-14  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 01/16] f2fs: extend folio state for large folio write path Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-14  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 02/16] f2fs: carry subpage offset and count in write IO Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-15  2:37   ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2026-10-14  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 03/16] f2fs: support regular file buffered writes on large folios Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-15 13:11   ` Chao Yu
2026-10-16  0:04   ` Chao Yu
2026-10-16  5:52     ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-14  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 04/16] f2fs: support atomic file large folios buffered write Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-14  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 05/16] f2fs: support large folio writeback Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-16  0:39   ` Chao Yu
2026-10-16  3:57     ` Chao Yu
2026-10-14  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 06/16] f2fs: account large folio dirty data at block granularity Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-14  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 07/16] f2fs: prepare mmap write faults for large folios Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-14  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 08/16] f2fs: make GC migration large-folio aware Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-16 11:25   ` Chao Yu
2026-10-14  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 09/16] f2fs: optimize small block size large folio read Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-14  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 10/16] f2fs: support partial uptodate " Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-15 13:34   ` Chao Yu
2026-10-14  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 11/16] f2fs: handle partial truncate of large folio dirty subpages Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-14  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 12/16] f2fs: wait for folio writeback before ffs_detach_free Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-14  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 13/16] f2fs: fix zeroing paths for large folios Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-14  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 14/16] f2fs: handle block cloning within the same large folio Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-14  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 15/16] f2fs: allow large folio support to writeable files Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-14  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 16/16] f2fs: make compressed files compatible with large folio Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-14 23:23 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v5 00/16] f2fs: support & optimize large folios for writable files Jaegeuk Kim
2026-10-15  2:13   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2026-10-15  2:36     ` Chao Yu
2026-10-15  3:33     ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-15 16:19       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2026-10-15 21:27         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2026-10-17 10:00           ` Nanzhe Zhao [this message]
2026-10-15  8:40     ` Nanzhe Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15373a26.1e3d.1a1494e8d1a.Coremail.nzzhao@126.com \
    --to=nzzhao@126.com \
    --cc=David.Hildenbrand@arm.com \
    --cc=Dev.Jain@arm.com \
    --cc=Ryan.Roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=daehojeong@google.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jyescas@google.com \
    --cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lipengfei28@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=nzzhao.sigma@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhangbo56@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®