mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, anton@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	zippel@linux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: thread_info implementation
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:18:38 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15464.35214.669412.477377@napali.hpl.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020211.190449.55725714.davem@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <15464.33256.837784.657759@napali.hpl.hp.com> <20020211.185100.68039940.davem@redhat.com> <15464.34183.282646.869983@napali.hpl.hp.com> <20020211.190449.55725714.davem@redhat.com>

>>>>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:04:49 -0800 (PST), "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> said:

  DaveM> You don't have any facts, you just "think" it will slow
  DaveM> things down because of the pointer dereference.  I challenge
  DaveM> you to show it actually shows up on the performance radar.

  DaveM> The thing is going to be fully hot in the cache all the time,
  DaveM> there is no way you'll take a cache miss for this
  DaveM> dereference.

Let's see: on Itanium, a ld takes up an M slot and has a 2 cycle
access latency (if in the first level cache).  This may or may not be
noticable in benchmarks, but it certainly won't go faster.  And all
this just for task coloring (which we can do with the old set up just
fine)?

	--david

  reply	other threads:[~2002-02-12  3:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-11 21:08 Roman Zippel
2002-02-11 20:50 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-02-12  0:01 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12  0:10   ` David Howells
2002-02-12  0:22     ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12  0:46 ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  0:57   ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12  0:57   ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  1:10     ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12 13:01     ` Bjorn Wesen
2002-02-12 13:49     ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  1:01   ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  1:21     ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  1:36       ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  1:53         ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  2:30           ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  2:46             ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  3:01               ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  3:18                 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2002-02-12  3:32                   ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  4:16                     ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  4:33                       ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  5:26                     ` Richard Henderson
2002-02-12  5:50                       ` David Mosberger
2002-02-13 11:18                       ` Anton Blanchard
2002-02-12  5:32                     ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  5:57                       ` Richard Henderson
2002-02-12  2:49             ` Davide Libenzi
2002-02-12  1:07   ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  1:32     ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  1:41       ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  2:22         ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  2:36           ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  2:51             ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  3:04               ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  3:23                 ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  3:42                   ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  4:21                     ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12 17:14                 ` Pavel Machek
2002-02-13  0:46                 ` David S. Miller
2002-02-13  1:30                   ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12  9:12               ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12  9:30                 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-12 10:14                   ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12 13:21               ` David Howells
2002-02-12 19:15               ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12 19:38                 ` David Howells
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-11 17:39 Arkadiy Chapkis - Arc
2002-02-11 20:19 ` Robert Love
2002-02-11 20:42   ` Luigi Genoni
2002-02-11 20:48     ` Robert Love
2002-02-11 23:37       ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-11 23:49         ` Richard Henderson
2002-02-12  0:09           ` Dave Jones
2002-02-12  0:20             ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-12  0:24               ` Dave Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15464.35214.669412.477377@napali.hpl.hp.com \
    --to=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®