mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: davidm@hpl.hp.com
Cc: anton@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zippel@linux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: thread_info implementation
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:07:09 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020211.170709.118972278.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200202120101.g1C11OJZ010115@napali.hpl.hp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020211.164617.39155905.davem@redhat.com> <200202120101.g1C11OJZ010115@napali.hpl.hp.com>

   From: David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com>
   Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:01:24 -0800
   
   I hope you don't consider this a good argument to force all the other
   platforms to throw away their perfectly good low-core code.

I didn't have to change any of my locore code, what the heck
are you talking about? :-)  All of the changes to _ANY_ assembly
on sparc64 looked like this:

-	lduw	[%g6 + AOFF_task_thread + AOFF_thread_flags], %l0
+	lduw	[%g6 + TI_FLAGS], %l0

It actually cleaned up my locore code :-)

I think, in fact, the everything people have right now in
thread_struct should move to thread_info and we should kill
off thread_struct entirely.  It has no reason to exist anymore.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-02-12  1:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-11 21:08 Roman Zippel
2002-02-11 20:50 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-02-12  0:01 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12  0:10   ` David Howells
2002-02-12  0:22     ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12  0:46 ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  0:57   ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12  0:57   ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  1:10     ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12 13:01     ` Bjorn Wesen
2002-02-12 13:49     ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  1:01   ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  1:21     ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  1:36       ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  1:53         ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  2:30           ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  2:46             ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  3:01               ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  3:18                 ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  3:32                   ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  4:16                     ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  4:33                       ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  5:26                     ` Richard Henderson
2002-02-12  5:50                       ` David Mosberger
2002-02-13 11:18                       ` Anton Blanchard
2002-02-12  5:32                     ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  5:57                       ` Richard Henderson
2002-02-12  2:49             ` Davide Libenzi
2002-02-12  1:07   ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-02-12  1:32     ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  1:41       ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  2:22         ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  2:36           ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  2:51             ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  3:04               ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  3:23                 ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  3:42                   ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  4:21                     ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12 17:14                 ` Pavel Machek
2002-02-13  0:46                 ` David S. Miller
2002-02-13  1:30                   ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12  9:12               ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12  9:30                 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-12 10:14                   ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12 13:21               ` David Howells
2002-02-12 19:15               ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12 19:38                 ` David Howells
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-11 17:39 Arkadiy Chapkis - Arc
2002-02-11 20:19 ` Robert Love
2002-02-11 20:42   ` Luigi Genoni
2002-02-11 20:48     ` Robert Love
2002-02-11 23:37       ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-11 23:49         ` Richard Henderson
2002-02-12  0:09           ` Dave Jones
2002-02-12  0:20             ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-12  0:24               ` Dave Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020211.170709.118972278.davem@redhat.com \
    --to=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®