* superfluous hardirq_endlock in bh_action
@ 2002-07-29 4:02 Paul Mackerras
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Paul Mackerras @ 2002-07-29 4:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: linux-kernel
It looks to me like the call to hardirq_endlock in bh_action is
superfluous, since it doesn't match up with any hardirq_trylock call
that I could see. Perhaps it should be removed?
Paul.
diff -urN linux-2.5/kernel/softirq.c pmac-2.5/kernel/softirq.c
--- linux-2.5/kernel/softirq.c Sun Jul 28 22:47:57 2002
+++ pmac-2.5/kernel/softirq.c Mon Jul 29 12:29:34 2002
@@ -293,7 +293,6 @@
if (bh_base[nr])
bh_base[nr]();
- hardirq_endlock();
spin_unlock(&global_bh_lock);
return;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-07-29 4:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-07-29 4:02 superfluous hardirq_endlock in bh_action Paul Mackerras
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®