mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se>
To: "Mala Anand" <manand@us.ibm.com>
Cc: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>,
	davem@redhat.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
	Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se>,
	"Bill Hartner" <bhartner@us.ibm.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 21:28:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15722.33143.220568.646900@robur.slu.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFFFA46B92.252E5659-ON87256C21.000BB73B@boulder.ibm.com>


Mala Anand writes:
 > I know you don't subscribe to lkml. Have you seen these results?
 > On Numa machine it showed around 3% improvement using SPECweb99.

 In slab terms you moved part of the destructor to the constructor
 but the main problem is still there. The skb entered the "wrong" CPU
 so to be "reused from the slab again" the work has to done regardless
 if it's in the constructor or destructor.

 Eventually if we accept some cache misses a skb could possibly be re-routed
 to the proper slab/CPU for this we would need some skb coloring.

 
 Also I noticed your TCP results w. e1000. 
 Here is what I see:
 
Linux 2.4.20-pre4/UP PIII @ 933 MHz w. Intel's e100 2 port GIGE adapter.
e1000 4.3.2-k1 (current kernel version) and current NAPI patch. For NAPI 
e1000 driver used RxIntDelay=1. RxIntDelay=0 caused problem now. Non-NAPI
driver used RxIntDelay=64. (default)

Three tests: TCP, UDP, packet forwarding.


Netperf. TCP socket size 131070, Single TCP stream. Test length 30 s.

M-size   e1000    NAPI-e1000
============================
      4   20.74    20.69  Mbit/s data received.
    128  458.14   465.26 
    512  836.40   846.71 
   1024  936.11   937.93 
   2048  940.65   939.92 
   4096  940.86   937.59
   8192  940.87   939.95 
  16384  940.88   937.61
  32768  940.89   939.92
  65536  940.90   939.48
 131070  940.84   939.74


Netperf. UDP_STREAM. 1440 pkts. Single UDP stream. Test length 30 s.
         e1000    NAPI-e1000
====================================
         955.7    955.7   Mbit/s data received.


Forwarding test. 1 Mpkts at 970 kpps injected.
          e1000   NAPI-e1000
=============================================
Tput       305   298580   Pkts routed.



Cheers.

						--ro

  reply	other threads:[~2002-08-26 19:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-08-26 13:04 Mala Anand
2002-08-26 19:28 ` Robert Olsson [this message]
2002-08-27 10:17 ` jamal
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-03  3:47 Mala Anand
2002-08-27 13:18 Mala Anand
2002-08-27 15:49 ` jamal
2002-08-27  2:53 Mala Anand
2002-08-25 20:12 Mala Anand
2002-08-26  1:02 ` jamal
2002-08-25 16:17 jamal
2002-08-25 22:51 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-23 23:38 Mala Anand
2002-08-23 23:55 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-23 23:14 Mala Anand
2002-08-23 14:44 Mala Anand
2002-08-23 16:39 ` Dave Hansen
2002-08-23 20:12   ` Bill Hartner
2002-08-23 20:30     ` Dave Hansen
2002-08-23 23:36       ` Troy Wilson
2002-08-23 20:51     ` Rick Lindsley
2002-08-23 22:41   ` David S. Miller
2002-08-22 17:22 Mala Anand
2002-08-22 18:32 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-08-22 19:02 ` Dave Hansen
2002-08-22 22:05   ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-08-23 19:09 ` Bill Hartner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15722.33143.220568.646900@robur.slu.se \
    --to=robert.olsson@data.slu.se \
    --cc=bhartner@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manand@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®