From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Mikael Starvik <mikael.starvik@axis.com>,
"'Daniel Jacobowitz'" <dan@debian.org>,
"'george anzinger'" <george@mvista.com>,
"'Jim Houston'" <jim.houston@ccur.com>,
"'Stephen Rothwell'" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
"'LKML'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"'anton@samba.org'" <anton@samba.org>,
"'David S. Miller'" <davem@redhat.com>, "'ak@muc.de'" <ak@muc.de>,
"'davidm@hpl.hp.com'" <davidm@hpl.hp.com>,
"'schwidefsky@de.ibm.com'" <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
"'ralf@gnu.org'" <ralf@gnu.org>,
"'willy@debian.org'" <willy@debian.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 10:46:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15860.58615.767758.764196@napali.hpl.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0212090906340.3410-100000@home.transmeta.com>
>>>>> On Mon, 9 Dec 2002 09:35:59 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> said:
Linus> And apparently ia64 is again being a singularly awkward
Linus> architecture.
I don't want to interfere with your ability to take potshots ;-), but
just to avoid confusion: passing syscall arguments in registers is NOT
an architectural requirement, it just makes good sense.
--david
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-09 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-09 16:58 Mikael Starvik
2002-12-09 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-09 18:46 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2002-12-10 0:13 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-12-10 23:11 ` george anzinger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-10 17:17 Martin Schwidefsky
2002-12-10 8:42 Martin Schwidefsky
2002-12-09 18:41 Martin Schwidefsky
2002-12-09 18:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-10 8:20 ` george anzinger
2002-12-09 17:56 Martin Schwidefsky
2002-12-09 18:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-10 14:40 ` Keith Owens
2002-12-09 17:16 Martin Schwidefsky
2002-12-09 17:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-09 20:18 ` David S. Miller
2002-12-04 7:02 Stephen Rothwell
2002-12-04 7:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2002-12-04 7:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2002-12-04 7:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
2002-12-04 11:57 ` Pavel Machek
2002-12-04 16:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-04 16:54 ` David S. Miller
2002-12-04 17:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-04 19:56 ` george anzinger
2002-12-04 20:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-04 20:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-04 22:09 ` David S. Miller
2002-12-04 22:31 ` george anzinger
2002-12-04 22:39 ` David S. Miller
2002-12-04 22:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-04 23:42 ` Jim Houston
2002-12-05 0:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-05 2:01 ` george anzinger
2002-12-05 2:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-05 3:10 ` Andi Kleen
2002-12-05 3:46 ` george anzinger
2002-12-05 4:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-05 7:10 ` george anzinger
2002-12-05 9:48 ` george anzinger
2002-12-05 15:24 ` Jim Houston
2002-12-05 16:35 ` george anzinger
2002-12-06 0:03 ` Richard Henderson
2002-12-05 17:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-06 9:17 ` george anzinger
2002-12-06 17:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-06 19:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-06 20:18 ` george anzinger
2002-12-06 21:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-06 21:56 ` Jim Houston
2002-12-06 22:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-07 2:25 ` george anzinger
2002-12-06 23:08 ` george anzinger
2002-12-08 20:41 ` David S. Miller
2002-12-09 6:18 ` Stephen Rothwell
2002-12-09 15:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-09 16:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-09 17:27 ` David Mosberger
2002-12-09 20:22 ` David S. Miller
2002-12-09 17:49 ` Jim Houston
2002-12-09 17:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-09 23:30 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-12-10 23:07 ` george anzinger
2002-12-11 7:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-11 8:11 ` george anzinger
2002-12-11 8:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-10 11:08 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-12-05 2:27 ` Jim Houston
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15860.58615.767758.764196@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=dan@debian.org \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=george@mvista.com \
--cc=jim.houston@ccur.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikael.starvik@axis.com \
--cc=ralf@gnu.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=willy@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®