[PATCH] ASoC: img: Fix a reference count leak in img_i2s_in_set_fmt

[PATCH] ASoC: img: Fix a reference count leak in img_i2s_in_set_fmt

[wu000273]

From: Qiushi Wu <wu000273@umn.edu>

pm_runtime_get_sync() increments the runtime PM usage counter even
when it returns an error code, causing incorrect ref count if
pm_runtime_put_noidle() is not called in error handling paths.
Thus call pm_runtime_put_noidle() if pm_runtime_get_sync() fails.

Signed-off-by: Qiushi Wu <wu000273@umn.edu>
---
 sound/soc/img/img-i2s-in.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/img/img-i2s-in.c b/sound/soc/img/img-i2s-in.c
index e30b66b94bf6..0843235d73c9 100644
--- a/sound/soc/img/img-i2s-in.c
+++ b/sound/soc/img/img-i2s-in.c
@@ -343,8 +343,10 @@ static int img_i2s_in_set_fmt(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, unsigned int fmt)
 	chan_control_mask = IMG_I2S_IN_CH_CTL_CLK_TRANS_MASK;
 
 	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(i2s->dev);
-	if (ret < 0)
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		pm_runtime_put_noidle(i2s->dev);
 		return ret;
+	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < i2s->active_channels; i++)
 		img_i2s_in_ch_disable(i2s, i);
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: img: Fix a reference count leak in img_i2s_in_set_fmt

[Mark Brown]

On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 22:37:48 -0500, wu000273@umn.edu wrote:
> pm_runtime_get_sync() increments the runtime PM usage counter even
> when it returns an error code, causing incorrect ref count if
> pm_runtime_put_noidle() is not called in error handling paths.
> Thus call pm_runtime_put_noidle() if pm_runtime_get_sync() fails.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: img: Fix a reference count leak in img_i2s_in_set_fmt
      commit: c4c59b95b7f7d4cef5071b151be2dadb33f3287b

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark