From: Martin Belanger <martin.nvme.dev@gmail.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>, Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>,
kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>,
Martin Belanger <martin.belanger@dell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v2 3/5] tls: update the RX key when a KeyUpdate is received
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 13:13:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15b492a8-f504-4294-b359-6943076d151d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b50b1b89-9a8c-4527-9a6f-e213952853d7@suse.de>
On 10/28/26 10:19, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 10/28/26 2:52 PM, Martin Belanger via B4 Relay wrote:
>> From: Martin Belanger <martin.belanger@dell.com>
>>
>> When a KeyUpdate arrives, kTLS blocks reads with -EKEYEXPIRED until
>> the user installs the next key. A kernel user such as nvme-tcp or
>> sunrpc never does, so the connection stalls.
>>
>> For a socket with a registered RX secret, derive the next key and
>> install it when the KeyUpdate is decrypted. The record is not passed to
>> the user, so recvmsg(), splice() and read_sock() go on to the next
>> record. Without a registered secret the behavior is unchanged.
>>
>> A KeyUpdate that is not alone in its record, has a wrong length or an
>> invalid request_update value ends the connection, as RFC 9846 section
>> 4.7.3 requires. So does a peer that sends more than 8 KeyUpdates in one
>> second, the same limit as GnuTLS.
>>
>> Assisted-by: LLM
>> Signed-off-by: Martin Belanger <martin.belanger@dell.com>
>> ---
>> include/net/tls.h | 7 +++
>> net/tls/Makefile | 3 +-
>> net/tls/tls.h | 2 +
>> net/tls/tls_keyupdate.c | 150 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> ++++++++++
>> net/tls/tls_sw.c | 43 ++++++++++++--
>> 5 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/tls.h b/include/net/tls.h
>> index aacc6d12226e..a5bc28a7d1f5 100644
>> --- a/include/net/tls.h
>> +++ b/include/net/tls.h
>> @@ -63,6 +63,11 @@ struct tls_rec;
>> #define TLS_HANDSHAKE_KEYUPDATE 24 /* rfc8446 B.3: Key
>> update */
>> +/* KeyUpdate: msg_type, 24-bit length, request_update (RFC 9846
>> 4.7.3) */
>> +#define TLS_KEYUPDATE_MSG_SIZE 5
>> +#define TLS_KEY_UPDATE_NOT_REQUESTED 0
>> +#define TLS_KEY_UPDATE_REQUESTED 1
>> +
>> #define TLS_AAD_SPACE_SIZE 13
>> /* SHA-384, the longest hash of a TLS 1.3 cipher suite kTLS supports */
>> @@ -142,6 +147,8 @@ struct tls_sw_context_rx {
>> u8 zc_capable:1;
>> u8 reader_contended:1;
>> bool key_update_pending;
>> + u8 key_update_count; /* received in this window */
>> + unsigned long key_update_window; /* jiffies */
>> struct tls_strparser strp;
>> diff --git a/net/tls/Makefile b/net/tls/Makefile
>> index 6edcf1271b75..ce8ac6a59f8c 100644
>> --- a/net/tls/Makefile
>> +++ b/net/tls/Makefile
>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ CFLAGS_trace.o := -I$(src)
>> obj-$(CONFIG_TLS) += tls.o
>> -tls-y := tls_main.o tls_sw.o tls_proc.o trace.o tls_strp.o tls_hkdf.o
>> +tls-y := tls_main.o tls_sw.o tls_proc.o trace.o tls_strp.o tls_hkdf.o \
>> + tls_keyupdate.o
>> tls-$(CONFIG_TLS_DEVICE) += tls_device.o tls_device_fallback.o
>> diff --git a/net/tls/tls.h b/net/tls/tls.h
>> index b2061f6bf065..63ece8074985 100644
>> --- a/net/tls/tls.h
>> +++ b/net/tls/tls.h
>> @@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ int init_prot_info(struct tls_prot_info *prot,
>> const struct tls_cipher_desc *cipher_desc);
>> int tls_hkdf_expand_label(const u8 *secret, size_t secret_len,
>> const char *label, u8 *out, size_t out_len);
>> +int tls_keyupdate_rekey(struct sock *sk, int tx);
>> +int tls_keyupdate_rx(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
>> int tls_set_sw_offload(struct sock *sk, int tx,
>> struct tls_crypto_info *new_crypto_info);
>> void tls_update_rx_zc_capable(struct tls_context *tls_ctx);
>> diff --git a/net/tls/tls_keyupdate.c b/net/tls/tls_keyupdate.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..543bf57599c7
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/net/tls/tls_keyupdate.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> +/* Copyright (c) 2026 Dell Technologies Inc. or its subsidiaries.
>> + *
>> + * TLS 1.3 KeyUpdate, RFC 9846 sections 4.7.3 and 7.2.
>> + *
>> + * A TLS 1.3 peer can change the key of the direction it sends in at any
>> + * time. It sends a KeyUpdate message, then encrypts all later records
>> + * with the next key. A sender must also change its key before the key
>> + * has protected too many records (section 5.5).
>> + *
>> + * The next key is derived from the application traffic secret, not from
>> + * the current key. User space gives the kernel only the key and IV, so
>> + * the kernel cannot derive the next key on its own. Without the secret,
>> + * a received KeyUpdate goes to the application, and the kernel stops
>> + * decrypting until the application installs the next key with TLS_RX.
>> + *
>> + * With TLS_TX_TRAFFIC_SECRET or TLS_RX_TRAFFIC_SECRET, user space also
>> + * gives the kernel the secret of that direction. The kernel then
>> handles
>> + * KeyUpdate itself. This file derives and installs the next key, and
>> + * processes a received KeyUpdate. tls_sw.c sends KeyUpdate messages.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/jiffies.h>
>> +#include <linux/skbuff.h>
>> +#include <net/strparser.h>
>> +#include <net/tls.h>
>> +
>> +#include "tls.h"
>> +
>> +/* A peer that sends more KeyUpdates than this in one second ends the
>> + * connection. Each one costs three HMACs and a new key, and carries no
>> + * data.
>> + */
>> +#define TLS_KEYUPDATE_RX_MAX_PER_SEC 8
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * tls_keyupdate_rekey - install the next key of one direction
>> + * @sk: socket
>> + * @tx: non-zero for the transmit direction
>> + *
>> + * Derive the next application traffic secret from the registered one,
>> + * then its key and IV, and install them. The record sequence number
>> + * restarts at zero.
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 on success, or a negative errno. On error the installed key
>> + * and the registered secret do not change.
>> + */
>> +int tls_keyupdate_rekey(struct sock *sk, int tx)
>> +{
>> + struct tls_context *ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
>> + struct tls_traffic_secret *secret;
>> + const struct tls_cipher_desc *cipher_desc;
>> + u8 iv[TLS_MAX_SALT_SIZE + TLS_MAX_IV_SIZE];
>> + u8 next[TLS_MAX_TRAFFIC_SECRET_SIZE];
>> + union tls_crypto_context tmp = {};
>> + struct tls_crypto_info *info = &tmp.info;
>> + int rc;
>> +
>> + secret = tx ? &ctx->tx_secret : &ctx->rx_secret;
>> + cipher_desc = get_cipher_desc(ctx->prot_info.cipher_type);
>> + if (!cipher_desc || !secret->len ||
>> + cipher_desc->salt + cipher_desc->iv > sizeof(iv))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + /* version and cipher_type; the rest of tmp stays zero */
>> + *info = tx ? ctx->crypto_send.info : ctx->crypto_recv.info;
>> +
>> + rc = tls_hkdf_expand_label(secret->data, secret->len, "traffic upd",
>> + next, secret->len);
>> + if (rc)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + rc = tls_hkdf_expand_label(next, secret->len, "key",
>> + crypto_info_key(info, cipher_desc),
>> + cipher_desc->key);
>> + if (rc)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + rc = tls_hkdf_expand_label(next, secret->len, "iv", iv,
>> + cipher_desc->salt + cipher_desc->iv);
>> + if (rc)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + memcpy(crypto_info_salt(info, cipher_desc), iv, cipher_desc->salt);
>> + memcpy(crypto_info_iv(info, cipher_desc), iv + cipher_desc->salt,
>> + cipher_desc->iv);
>> +
>> + rc = tls_set_sw_offload(sk, tx, info);
>> + if (rc)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + memcpy(secret->data, next, secret->len);
>> +
>> +out:
>> + memzero_explicit(next, sizeof(next));
>> + memzero_explicit(iv, sizeof(iv));
>> + memzero_explicit(&tmp, sizeof(tmp));
>> +
>> + return rc;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * tls_keyupdate_rx - process a received KeyUpdate
>> + * @sk: socket
>> + * @skb: the decrypted record, which starts with a KeyUpdate message
>> + *
>> + * Called with the socket locked, for a direction with a registered
>> + * secret. The caller does not pass the record to the user.
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 on success, or a negative errno if the connection must end.
>> + */
>> +int tls_keyupdate_rx(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> +{
>> + struct tls_context *ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
>> + struct tls_sw_context_rx *rx_ctx = tls_sw_ctx_rx(ctx);
>> + const struct strp_msg *rxm = strp_msg(skb);
>> + u8 msg[TLS_KEYUPDATE_MSG_SIZE];
>> + int rc;
>> +
>> + /* A KeyUpdate must end its record (section 5.1). Another message
>> + * in the same record is not supported.
>> + */
>> + if (rxm->full_len != sizeof(msg) ||
>> + skb_copy_bits(skb, rxm->offset, msg, sizeof(msg)))
>> + return -EBADMSG;
>> +
>> + /* msg_type, a 24-bit length of 1, then request_update */
>> + if (msg[1] || msg[2] || msg[3] != 1)
>> + return -EBADMSG;
>> + if (msg[4] != TLS_KEY_UPDATE_NOT_REQUESTED &&
>> + msg[4] != TLS_KEY_UPDATE_REQUESTED)
>> + return -EBADMSG;
>> +
>> + if (!rx_ctx->key_update_count ||
>> + time_after(jiffies, rx_ctx->key_update_window + HZ)) {
>> + rx_ctx->key_update_window = jiffies;
>> + rx_ctx->key_update_count = 0;
>> + }
>> + if (++rx_ctx->key_update_count > TLS_KEYUPDATE_RX_MAX_PER_SEC)
>
> Hmm. I see the rationale, but the actual number falls a bit out of
> thin air. And closing the connection with no indiation is bound
> to confuse users.
It's just to prevent a flood of KeyUpdates.
The number comes from GnuTLS: lib/tls13/key_update.c has
KEY_UPDATES_PER_WINDOW 8 in a window of 1000 ms, and the ninth
KeyUpdate ends the session with GNUTLS_E_TOO_MANY_HANDSHAKE_PACKETS.
GnuTLS logs it only at debug level. OpenSSL has no limit.
> Please add a WARN_ON() statemen there such that the admin is informed,
> and I _think_ we could just leave the connection running instead of
> closing.
The peer controls this condition, so a WARN_ON() would let a remote
peer trigger kernel warnings, and a panic with panic_on_warn. I would
use net_warn_ratelimited() and a MIB counter instead.
Leaving the connection running is fine with me. The peer is
authenticated, the cost per KeyUpdate is three HMACs and a key change,
and OpenSSL accepts any number. In v3, I will drop the limit and the
close, and count and log a peer that sends more than 8 KeyUpdates in
one second. Does that work for you?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-28 13:52 [PATCH RFC net-next v2 0/5] tls: perform TLS 1.3 KeyUpdate in the kernel Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-28 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 1/5] tls: add HKDF-Expand-Label for the TLS 1.3 key schedule Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-28 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 2/5] tls: add socket options to register the traffic secrets Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-28 14:13 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-10-28 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 3/5] tls: update the RX key when a KeyUpdate is received Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-28 14:19 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-10-28 17:13 ` Martin Belanger [this message]
2026-10-28 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 4/5] tls: send a KeyUpdate at the record limit and on request Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-28 14:23 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-10-28 17:18 ` Martin Belanger
2026-10-28 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 5/5] selftests/tls: add KeyUpdate tests Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-28 14:24 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-10-28 14:21 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 0/5] tls: perform TLS 1.3 KeyUpdate in the kernel Chuck Lever
2026-10-28 14:42 ` Hannes Reinecke
[not found] ` <CAPG1HMsnUDa=Q5O4fwZOU=Pd+m7ahzu574Cs+mWoB_9KUT5ASA@mail.gmail.com>
2026-10-28 15:01 ` Chuck Lever
2026-10-28 15:12 ` Martin Belanger
2026-10-28 15:04 ` Martin Belanger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15b492a8-f504-4294-b359-6943076d151d@gmail.com \
--to=martin.nvme.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=martin.belanger@dell.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®