* [PATCH] sched_ext: Avoid relocking DSQ during remote consumption
@ 2026-09-23 14:07 Usama Arif
2026-09-23 18:59 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Usama Arif @ 2026-09-23 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: arighi, bsegall, changwoo, dietmar.eggemann, etsal, juri.lelli,
kprateek.nayak, linux-kernel, mgorman, mingo, peterz, rostedt,
sched-ext, tj, vincent.guittot, void, vschneid, yphbchou0911
Cc: Usama Arif
A remote consume unlinks a task from a non-local DSQ before switching
to the task's rq. Leaving p->scx.dsq set makes the following
deactivate_task() reacquire the DSQ lock in scx_dispatch_dequeue() to
clear the transfer state.
Keep p->scx.dsq set while switching rq locks so that a racing dequeue
can find the DSQ and cancel the transfer. After acquiring the source rq
and confirming ownership, clear p->scx.dsq. The subsequent dequeue then
takes its !dsq path without reacquiring the DSQ lock.
Fleet profiles show that roughly 70% of the cycles attributed to
scx_dispatch_dequeue() are spent in queued_spin_lock_slowpath() while
taking dsq->lock.
Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
---
kernel/sched/ext/ext.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
index cf8e32044ffb1..0135ff6824b03 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
@@ -2612,7 +2612,7 @@ static bool task_can_run_on_remote_rq(struct scx_sched *sch,
* points to this CPU. See scx_dispatch_dequeue() for the counterpart.
*
* On return, @dsq is unlocked and @src_rq is locked. Returns %true if @p is
- * still valid. %false if lost to dequeue.
+ * still valid and detached from @dsq. %false if lost to dequeue.
*/
static bool unlink_dsq_and_switch_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p,
struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq,
@@ -2632,8 +2632,19 @@ static bool unlink_dsq_and_switch_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p,
switch_rq_lock(locked_rq, src_rq);
/* task_rq couldn't have changed if we're still the holding cpu */
- return likely(p->scx.holding_cpu == cpu) &&
- !WARN_ON_ONCE(src_rq != task_rq(p));
+ if (likely(p->scx.holding_cpu == cpu) &&
+ !WARN_ON_ONCE(src_rq != task_rq(p))) {
+ /*
+ * Keep ->dsq set until we own @src_rq so that a racing dequeue
+ * can find @dsq and clear holding_cpu. Once ownership is
+ * confirmed, clear it under @src_rq so that deactivate_task()
+ * takes the !dsq path instead of retaking @dsq->lock.
+ */
+ p->scx.dsq = NULL;
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
}
static bool consume_remote_task(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *this_rq,
--
2.53.0-Meta
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: Avoid relocking DSQ during remote consumption
2026-09-23 14:07 [PATCH] sched_ext: Avoid relocking DSQ during remote consumption Usama Arif
@ 2026-09-23 18:59 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2026-09-23 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Usama Arif
Cc: arighi, bsegall, changwoo, dietmar.eggemann, etsal, juri.lelli,
kprateek.nayak, linux-kernel, mgorman, mingo, peterz, rostedt,
sched-ext, tj, vincent.guittot, void, vschneid, yphbchou0911,
emil, david.dai
Applied to sched_ext/for-7.4 with an unnecessary line break removed.
Possible follow-ups:
- The !dsq branch comment in scx_dispatch_dequeue() only mentions direct
dispatch as a source of holding_cpu. Remote consume now reaches it too.
Can you update the comment? The dsq branch comment also names
dispatch_to_local_dsq() as the racer when it's
unlink_dsq_and_switch_rq_lock().
- The remote local DSQ branch of move_task_between_dsqs() has the same
relock. Calling dispatch_dequeue_locked() before dropping src_dsq->lock
would avoid it. scx_bpf_dsq_move() isn't widely used, but it'd still be
nice.
Thanks.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-23 18:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-23 14:07 [PATCH] sched_ext: Avoid relocking DSQ during remote consumption Usama Arif
2026-09-23 18:59 ` Tejun Heo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®