* [PATCH v6 0/2] of_iommu: add support for "iommu-ranges"
@ 2026-11-03 15:29 Vikash Garodia
2026-11-03 15:29 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] iommu: use resource_size_t for reserved region length Vikash Garodia
2026-11-03 15:29 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] of: Add support for "iommu-ranges" on a device node Vikash Garodia
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Vikash Garodia @ 2026-11-03 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joerg Roedel (AMD),
Vasant Hegde, Suravee Suthikulpanit, Will Deacon, Robin Murphy,
David Woodhouse, Lu Baolu, Jean-Philippe Brucker, Rob Herring,
Saravana Kannan, Tomasz Nowicki, Eric Auger,
Bryan O'Donoghue
Cc: iommu, linux-kernel, virtualization, devicetree, Vikash Garodia,
Sashiko, stable, Vishnu Reddy, Dmitry Baryshkov
The series adds support for recently introduced property
"iommu-ranges". It adds the required checks to error out for cases
which are not following the schema definition.
Iommu-ranges was defined in schema with this PR
https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/pull/207
The patch series is being posted as revision v6, since the patches
were initially part of the media series [1]. The patches are moved out
to get review comments from iommu reviewers, which was otherwise looking
as a media seris. Happy to move this back to media series if anyone have
any concerns.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20260926-vpu_iommu_iova_handling-v5-0-0322ca5dc10c@oss.qualcomm.com/
Signed-off-by: Vikash Garodia <vikash.garodia@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
Changes in v6:
- Addressed sashiko comments.
- Addressed comment from Bryan.
- Link to v5: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260926-vpu_iommu_iova_handling-v5-4-0322ca5dc10c@oss.qualcomm.com/
---
Vikash Garodia (2):
iommu: use resource_size_t for reserved region length
of: Add support for "iommu-ranges" on a device node
drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c | 2 +-
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 2 +-
drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 2 +-
drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c | 2 +-
drivers/of/address.c | 2 +-
include/linux/iommu.h | 4 +-
include/linux/of_address.h | 2 +-
8 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 2637bdec0535a2044cd830eba9a79363651d9043
change-id: 20261103-add_iommu_ranges-549cf3fb0867
Best regards,
--
Vikash Garodia <vikash.garodia@oss.qualcomm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [PATCH v6 1/2] iommu: use resource_size_t for reserved region length 2026-11-03 15:29 [PATCH v6 0/2] of_iommu: add support for "iommu-ranges" Vikash Garodia @ 2026-11-03 15:29 ` Vikash Garodia 2026-11-03 15:29 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] of: Add support for "iommu-ranges" on a device node Vikash Garodia 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Vikash Garodia @ 2026-11-03 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joerg Roedel (AMD), Vasant Hegde, Suravee Suthikulpanit, Will Deacon, Robin Murphy, David Woodhouse, Lu Baolu, Jean-Philippe Brucker, Rob Herring, Saravana Kannan, Tomasz Nowicki, Eric Auger, Bryan O'Donoghue Cc: iommu, linux-kernel, virtualization, devicetree, Vikash Garodia, Sashiko, stable, Vishnu Reddy On 32-bit systems with LPAE, physical addresses are 64-bit. A reserved region can be larger than 4GiB, but its length is stored as size_t, which is only 32-bit there. The length gets truncated. Use resource_size_t for the length so it matches the width of phys_addr_t and holds the full size of the region. Fixes: 2b20cbba3390 ("iommu: iommu_alloc_resv_region") Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/d223ee9f-b262-408a-a201-8b16d310bbe0@oss.qualcomm.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Co-developed-by: Vishnu Reddy <busanna.reddy@oss.qualcomm.com> Signed-off-by: Vishnu Reddy <busanna.reddy@oss.qualcomm.com> Signed-off-by: Vikash Garodia <vikash.garodia@oss.qualcomm.com> --- drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c | 2 +- drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 2 +- drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 2 +- drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 4 ++-- drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c | 2 +- drivers/of/address.c | 2 +- include/linux/iommu.h | 4 ++-- include/linux/of_address.h | 2 +- 8 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c index 960e1dc05ec69b346d1af73241dfa51393b0851a..179e6c28afe6f86c233d9d7e64abb0870095e985 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c @@ -3327,7 +3327,7 @@ static void amd_iommu_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev, list_for_each_entry(entry, &pci_seg->unity_map, list) { int type, prot = 0; - size_t length; + resource_size_t length; if (devid < entry->devid_start || devid > entry->devid_end) continue; diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c index 5a2e705a2f2e025245d4b42c4a9f765c67d708d4..70e210ca085ff52519376358a3e3b7a01619d7a8 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c @@ -3535,7 +3535,7 @@ static void intel_iommu_get_resv_regions(struct device *device, i, i_dev) { struct iommu_resv_region *resv; enum iommu_resv_type type; - size_t length; + resource_size_t length; if (i_dev != device && !is_downstream_to_pci_bridge(device, i_dev)) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c index b486b8bbd1fcdc359d936234bb3f8631306c8786..18f3efb94043ace9f1f4abc7c6ac8974dc25b0c0 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c @@ -3010,7 +3010,7 @@ void iommu_put_resv_regions(struct device *dev, struct list_head *list) EXPORT_SYMBOL(iommu_put_resv_regions); struct iommu_resv_region *iommu_alloc_resv_region(phys_addr_t start, - size_t length, int prot, + resource_size_t length, int prot, enum iommu_resv_type type, gfp_t gfp) { diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c index a18bb60f6f3dfdba853b6e16dd2a8616f6a731c7..5c266511db78910d6fd221af5437cecff4931c22 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ int of_iommu_configure(struct device *dev, struct device_node *master_np, static enum iommu_resv_type __maybe_unused iommu_resv_region_get_type(struct device *dev, struct resource *phys, - phys_addr_t start, size_t length) + phys_addr_t start, resource_size_t length) { phys_addr_t end = start + length - 1; @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ void of_iommu_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev, struct list_head *list) struct iommu_resv_region *region; enum iommu_resv_type type; phys_addr_t iova; - size_t length; + resource_size_t length; if (of_dma_is_coherent(dev->of_node)) prot |= IOMMU_CACHE; diff --git a/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c index 587fc13197f12227e69aedbc721cfd49cebde2ef..a37e713b0678a516a777436d616f0d3df54eae38 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c @@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ static int viommu_add_resv_mem(struct viommu_endpoint *vdev, struct virtio_iommu_probe_resv_mem *mem, size_t len) { - size_t size; + resource_size_t size; u64 start64, end64; phys_addr_t start, end; struct iommu_resv_region *region = NULL, *next; diff --git a/drivers/of/address.c b/drivers/of/address.c index 499d37ceae210ac844eef853aeecbfabaaa5e138..f665432638a6d1cc1ebfc0d2356b813c8c584910 100644 --- a/drivers/of/address.c +++ b/drivers/of/address.c @@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_translate_dma_address); * Returns a pointer to the cell immediately following the translated DMA region. */ const __be32 *of_translate_dma_region(struct device_node *dev, const __be32 *prop, - phys_addr_t *start, size_t *length) + phys_addr_t *start, resource_size_t *length) { struct device_node *parent __free(device_node) = __of_get_dma_parent(dev); u64 address, size; diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h index ef5043752a3651419679316c5a20cdf049efeaba..1d8f9381a358ec2309503bfe2866f08a1f236b2b 100644 --- a/include/linux/iommu.h +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ enum iommu_resv_type { struct iommu_resv_region { struct list_head list; phys_addr_t start; - size_t length; + resource_size_t length; int prot; enum iommu_resv_type type; void (*free)(struct device *dev, struct iommu_resv_region *region); @@ -968,7 +968,7 @@ extern void iommu_set_default_passthrough(bool cmd_line); extern void iommu_set_default_translated(bool cmd_line); extern bool iommu_default_passthrough(void); extern struct iommu_resv_region * -iommu_alloc_resv_region(phys_addr_t start, size_t length, int prot, +iommu_alloc_resv_region(phys_addr_t start, resource_size_t length, int prot, enum iommu_resv_type type, gfp_t gfp); extern int iommu_get_group_resv_regions(struct iommu_group *group, struct list_head *head); diff --git a/include/linux/of_address.h b/include/linux/of_address.h index 0cff9036539168b0cf2826ee34417738a4836ace..ae6d96c8c110adad966f2c1bad2cbefaf55e5c57 100644 --- a/include/linux/of_address.h +++ b/include/linux/of_address.h @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static inline int of_range_count(const struct of_range_parser *parser) extern u64 of_translate_dma_address(struct device_node *dev, const __be32 *in_addr); extern const __be32 *of_translate_dma_region(struct device_node *dev, const __be32 *addr, - phys_addr_t *start, size_t *length); + phys_addr_t *start, resource_size_t *length); #ifdef CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS extern u64 of_translate_address(struct device_node *np, const __be32 *addr); -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6 2/2] of: Add support for "iommu-ranges" on a device node 2026-11-03 15:29 [PATCH v6 0/2] of_iommu: add support for "iommu-ranges" Vikash Garodia 2026-11-03 15:29 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] iommu: use resource_size_t for reserved region length Vikash Garodia @ 2026-11-03 15:29 ` Vikash Garodia 2026-11-04 16:03 ` Rob Herring 2026-11-04 16:23 ` Bryan O'Donoghue 1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Vikash Garodia @ 2026-11-03 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joerg Roedel (AMD), Vasant Hegde, Suravee Suthikulpanit, Will Deacon, Robin Murphy, David Woodhouse, Lu Baolu, Jean-Philippe Brucker, Rob Herring, Saravana Kannan, Tomasz Nowicki, Eric Auger, Bryan O'Donoghue Cc: iommu, linux-kernel, virtualization, devicetree, Vikash Garodia, Dmitry Baryshkov, Vishnu Reddy Reserving an IOVA address using "iommu-addresses" requires it to be placed in the reserved-memory node. But when "iommu-addresses" is the only property being described and there is no backing "reg" (i.e. no actual reserved system memory), it does not really belong under /reserved-memory. A device IOVA range is specific to its own address space, and does not describe the system physical memory to make it qualify under reserved-memory. Given this, place "iommu-addresses" inside reserved-memory only when it is paired with a "reg", otherwise, define it within the device own node. It was discussed here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/662f7093-fb0a-4564-9ca0-98e03e68ba9a@kernel.org Existing "iommu-addresses" property expects a phandle, which does not make sense when the property is defined within the device node. "iommu-ranges" was introduced to specify the device specific IOVA ranges when there is no backing "reg". Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com> Co-developed-by: Vishnu Reddy <busanna.reddy@oss.qualcomm.com> Signed-off-by: Vishnu Reddy <busanna.reddy@oss.qualcomm.com> Signed-off-by: Vikash Garodia <vikash.garodia@oss.qualcomm.com> --- drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 125 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c index 5c266511db78910d6fd221af5437cecff4931c22..0428ceb50dec58f11872b4fb64e283fa8d9046a3 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c @@ -185,11 +185,118 @@ iommu_resv_region_get_type(struct device *dev, if (start == phys->start && end == phys->end) return IOMMU_RESV_DIRECT; - dev_warn(dev, "treating non-direct mapping [%pr] -> [%pap-%pap] as reservation\n", phys, - &start, &end); + dev_err(dev, "non-direct mapping [%pr] -> [%pap-%pap] is not supported\n", phys, + &start, &end); return IOMMU_RESV_RESERVED; } +/** + * of_iommu_derive_resv_regions - derive reserved regions which + * are outside of iommu-ranges + * @dev: device for which to get reserved regions + * @list: reserved region list + * + * A device can describe its own usable IOVA ranges directly on its node + * via "iommu-ranges". Everything not under those ranges is derived + * as a reserved region so the IOMMU allocator won't use it. Entries may + * appear in any order in the property. + */ +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS) +static void of_iommu_derive_resv_regions(struct device *dev, struct list_head *list) +{ + struct of_iommu_range { + struct list_head node; + phys_addr_t start; + phys_addr_t end; + } *pos, *new, *next_range; + int size, prot = IOMMU_READ | IOMMU_WRITE; + struct iommu_resv_region *region; + const __be32 *maps, *end; + struct list_head *prev; + phys_addr_t next = 0; + LIST_HEAD(ranges); + + maps = of_get_property(dev->of_node, "iommu-ranges", &size); + if (!maps) + return; + + end = maps + size / sizeof(__be32); + + while (maps < end) { + phys_addr_t iova, iova_end; + resource_size_t length; + + maps = of_translate_dma_region(dev->of_node, maps, &iova, &length); + if (!maps) { + dev_err(dev, "%pOF: failed to parse iommu-ranges\n", + dev->of_node); + break; + } + + if (!length) + continue; + + iova_end = iova + length - 1; + + if (iova_end < iova) { + dev_err(dev, "%pOF: iommu-ranges overflows address space\n", + dev->of_node); + continue; + } + + prev = &ranges; + list_for_each_entry(pos, &ranges, node) { + if (pos->start > iova) + break; + prev = &pos->node; + } + + new = kmalloc_obj(*new); + if (!new) + continue; + + new->start = iova; + new->end = iova_end; + list_add(&new->node, prev); + } + + if (list_empty(&ranges)) + return; + + if (of_dma_is_coherent(dev->of_node)) + prot |= IOMMU_CACHE; + + list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, next_range, &ranges, node) { + if (pos->start > next) { + region = iommu_alloc_resv_region(next, pos->start - next, prot, + IOMMU_RESV_RESERVED, GFP_KERNEL); + if (region) + list_add_tail(®ion->list, list); + } + + if (pos->end == PHYS_ADDR_MAX) + goto exit; + + if (pos->end >= next) + next = pos->end + 1; + + list_del(&pos->node); + kfree(pos); + } + + region = iommu_alloc_resv_region(next, PHYS_ADDR_MAX - next + 1, + prot, IOMMU_RESV_RESERVED, GFP_KERNEL); + if (region) + list_add_tail(®ion->list, list); + +exit: + list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, next_range, &ranges, node) { + list_del(&pos->node); + kfree(pos); + } +} +#endif + /** * of_iommu_get_resv_regions - reserved region driver helper for device tree * @dev: device for which to get reserved regions @@ -214,10 +321,14 @@ void of_iommu_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev, struct list_head *list) memset(&phys, 0, sizeof(phys)); + maps = of_get_property(it.node, "iommu-addresses", &size); + if (!maps) + continue; + /* - * The "reg" property is optional and can be omitted by reserved-memory regions - * that represent reservations in the IOVA space, which are regions that should - * not be mapped. + * "iommu-addresses" must be used in combination with a "reg" that provides + * the physical address and size of this memory region, for an identity 1:1 + * IOVA mapping to that physical memory. */ if (of_property_present(it.node, "reg")) { err = of_address_to_resource(it.node, 0, &phys); @@ -226,11 +337,11 @@ void of_iommu_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev, struct list_head *list) it.node, err); continue; } - } - - maps = of_get_property(it.node, "iommu-addresses", &size); - if (!maps) + } else { + dev_err(dev, "%pOF: iommu-addresses requires a reg property\n", + it.node); continue; + } end = maps + size / sizeof(__be32); @@ -258,6 +369,9 @@ void of_iommu_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev, struct list_head *list) } type = iommu_resv_region_get_type(dev, &phys, iova, length); + if (type != IOMMU_RESV_DIRECT) + continue; + region = iommu_alloc_resv_region(iova, length, prot, type, GFP_KERNEL); if (region) @@ -265,6 +379,8 @@ void of_iommu_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev, struct list_head *list) } } } + + of_iommu_derive_resv_regions(dev, list); #endif } EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_iommu_get_resv_regions); -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] of: Add support for "iommu-ranges" on a device node 2026-11-03 15:29 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] of: Add support for "iommu-ranges" on a device node Vikash Garodia @ 2026-11-04 16:03 ` Rob Herring 2026-11-05 13:39 ` Vikash Garodia 2026-11-04 16:23 ` Bryan O'Donoghue 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Rob Herring @ 2026-11-04 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vikash Garodia Cc: Joerg Roedel (AMD), Vasant Hegde, Suravee Suthikulpanit, Will Deacon, Robin Murphy, David Woodhouse, Lu Baolu, Jean-Philippe Brucker, Saravana Kannan, Tomasz Nowicki, Eric Auger, Bryan O'Donoghue, iommu, linux-kernel, virtualization, devicetree, Dmitry Baryshkov, Vishnu Reddy On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 08:59:33PM +0530, Vikash Garodia wrote: > Reserving an IOVA address using "iommu-addresses" requires it to be > placed in the reserved-memory node. But when "iommu-addresses" is the > only property being described and there is no backing "reg" (i.e. no > actual reserved system memory), it does not really belong under > /reserved-memory. A device IOVA range is specific to its own address > space, and does not describe the system physical memory to make it > qualify under reserved-memory. Given this, place "iommu-addresses" > inside reserved-memory only when it is paired with a "reg", otherwise, > define it within the device own node. It was discussed here: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/662f7093-fb0a-4564-9ca0-98e03e68ba9a@kernel.org > > Existing "iommu-addresses" property expects a phandle, which does > not make sense when the property is defined within the device node. > "iommu-ranges" was introduced to specify the device specific IOVA ranges > when there is no backing "reg". > > Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com> > Co-developed-by: Vishnu Reddy <busanna.reddy@oss.qualcomm.com> > Signed-off-by: Vishnu Reddy <busanna.reddy@oss.qualcomm.com> > Signed-off-by: Vikash Garodia <vikash.garodia@oss.qualcomm.com> > --- > drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 125 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c > index 5c266511db78910d6fd221af5437cecff4931c22..0428ceb50dec58f11872b4fb64e283fa8d9046a3 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c > @@ -185,11 +185,118 @@ iommu_resv_region_get_type(struct device *dev, > if (start == phys->start && end == phys->end) > return IOMMU_RESV_DIRECT; > > - dev_warn(dev, "treating non-direct mapping [%pr] -> [%pap-%pap] as reservation\n", phys, > - &start, &end); > + dev_err(dev, "non-direct mapping [%pr] -> [%pap-%pap] is not supported\n", phys, > + &start, &end); > return IOMMU_RESV_RESERVED; > } > > +/** > + * of_iommu_derive_resv_regions - derive reserved regions which > + * are outside of iommu-ranges > + * @dev: device for which to get reserved regions > + * @list: reserved region list > + * > + * A device can describe its own usable IOVA ranges directly on its node > + * via "iommu-ranges". Everything not under those ranges is derived > + * as a reserved region so the IOMMU allocator won't use it. Entries may > + * appear in any order in the property. > + */ > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS) Is this really needed? Assuming CONFIG_OF is enabled, this is only false on Sparc. I don't think Sparc needs anything in this file. There aren't any IOMMU drivers for Sparc unless COMPILE_TEST is enabled. So maybe building of_iommu.c as a whole should depend on CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS? Rob ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] of: Add support for "iommu-ranges" on a device node 2026-11-04 16:03 ` Rob Herring @ 2026-11-05 13:39 ` Vikash Garodia 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Vikash Garodia @ 2026-11-05 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rob Herring Cc: Joerg Roedel (AMD), Vasant Hegde, Suravee Suthikulpanit, Will Deacon, Robin Murphy, David Woodhouse, Lu Baolu, Jean-Philippe Brucker, Saravana Kannan, Tomasz Nowicki, Eric Auger, Bryan O'Donoghue, iommu, linux-kernel, virtualization, devicetree, Dmitry Baryshkov, Vishnu Reddy Hi Rob, Appreciate your reviews/suggestions on this patch. On 11/4/2026 9:33 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 08:59:33PM +0530, Vikash Garodia wrote: >> Reserving an IOVA address using "iommu-addresses" requires it to be >> placed in the reserved-memory node. But when "iommu-addresses" is the >> only property being described and there is no backing "reg" (i.e. no >> actual reserved system memory), it does not really belong under >> /reserved-memory. A device IOVA range is specific to its own address >> space, and does not describe the system physical memory to make it >> qualify under reserved-memory. Given this, place "iommu-addresses" >> inside reserved-memory only when it is paired with a "reg", otherwise, >> define it within the device own node. It was discussed here: >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/662f7093-fb0a-4564-9ca0-98e03e68ba9a@kernel.org >> >> Existing "iommu-addresses" property expects a phandle, which does >> not make sense when the property is defined within the device node. >> "iommu-ranges" was introduced to specify the device specific IOVA ranges >> when there is no backing "reg". >> >> Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> >> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com> >> Co-developed-by: Vishnu Reddy <busanna.reddy@oss.qualcomm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Vishnu Reddy <busanna.reddy@oss.qualcomm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Vikash Garodia <vikash.garodia@oss.qualcomm.com> >> --- >> drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- >> 1 file changed, 125 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c >> index 5c266511db78910d6fd221af5437cecff4931c22..0428ceb50dec58f11872b4fb64e283fa8d9046a3 100644 >> --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c >> @@ -185,11 +185,118 @@ iommu_resv_region_get_type(struct device *dev, >> if (start == phys->start && end == phys->end) >> return IOMMU_RESV_DIRECT; >> >> - dev_warn(dev, "treating non-direct mapping [%pr] -> [%pap-%pap] as reservation\n", phys, >> - &start, &end); >> + dev_err(dev, "non-direct mapping [%pr] -> [%pap-%pap] is not supported\n", phys, >> + &start, &end); >> return IOMMU_RESV_RESERVED; >> } >> >> +/** >> + * of_iommu_derive_resv_regions - derive reserved regions which >> + * are outside of iommu-ranges >> + * @dev: device for which to get reserved regions >> + * @list: reserved region list >> + * >> + * A device can describe its own usable IOVA ranges directly on its node >> + * via "iommu-ranges". Everything not under those ranges is derived >> + * as a reserved region so the IOMMU allocator won't use it. Entries may >> + * appear in any order in the property. >> + */ >> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS) > > Is this really needed? Assuming CONFIG_OF is enabled, this is only false > on Sparc. I don't think Sparc needs anything in this file. There > aren't any IOMMU drivers for Sparc unless COMPILE_TEST is enabled. So > maybe building of_iommu.c as a whole should depend on CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS? Agree, that's much better than adding the check, will drop from other places too and make it conditional compilation. Regards, Vikash > > Rob ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] of: Add support for "iommu-ranges" on a device node 2026-11-03 15:29 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] of: Add support for "iommu-ranges" on a device node Vikash Garodia 2026-11-04 16:03 ` Rob Herring @ 2026-11-04 16:23 ` Bryan O'Donoghue 2026-11-05 13:41 ` Vikash Garodia 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Bryan O'Donoghue @ 2026-11-04 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vikash Garodia, Joerg Roedel (AMD), Vasant Hegde, Suravee Suthikulpanit, Will Deacon, Robin Murphy, David Woodhouse, Lu Baolu, Jean-Philippe Brucker, Rob Herring, Saravana Kannan, Tomasz Nowicki, Eric Auger Cc: iommu, linux-kernel, virtualization, devicetree, Dmitry Baryshkov, Vishnu Reddy On 03/11/2026 15:29, Vikash Garodia wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c > index 5c266511db78910d6fd221af5437cecff4931c22..0428ceb50dec58f11872b4fb64e283fa8d9046a3 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c > @@ -185,11 +185,118 @@ iommu_resv_region_get_type(struct device *dev, > if (start == phys->start && end == phys->end) > return IOMMU_RESV_DIRECT; > > - dev_warn(dev, "treating non-direct mapping [%pr] -> [%pap-%pap] as reservation\n", phys, > - &start, &end); > + dev_err(dev, "non-direct mapping [%pr] -> [%pap-%pap] is not supported\n", phys, > + &start, &end); > return IOMMU_RESV_RESERVED; > } > Same feedback as @ the last version of this. I still think this behaviour change should have its own patch that preceds this patch so that the logical change is clearly explained and understood as a standalone change. Supporting iommu-ranges != not mapping misaligned ranges. Otherwise this change goes under the radar of the new functionality addition. --- bod ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] of: Add support for "iommu-ranges" on a device node 2026-11-04 16:23 ` Bryan O'Donoghue @ 2026-11-05 13:41 ` Vikash Garodia 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Vikash Garodia @ 2026-11-05 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bryan O'Donoghue, Joerg Roedel (AMD), Vasant Hegde, Suravee Suthikulpanit, Will Deacon, Robin Murphy, David Woodhouse, Lu Baolu, Jean-Philippe Brucker, Rob Herring, Saravana Kannan, Tomasz Nowicki, Eric Auger Cc: iommu, linux-kernel, virtualization, devicetree, Dmitry Baryshkov, Vishnu Reddy Hi Bryan, On 11/4/2026 9:53 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On 03/11/2026 15:29, Vikash Garodia wrote: >> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c >> index >> 5c266511db78910d6fd221af5437cecff4931c22..0428ceb50dec58f11872b4fb64e283fa8d9046a3 100644 >> --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c >> @@ -185,11 +185,118 @@ iommu_resv_region_get_type(struct device *dev, >> if (start == phys->start && end == phys->end) >> return IOMMU_RESV_DIRECT; >> - dev_warn(dev, "treating non-direct mapping [%pr] -> [%pap-%pap] >> as reservation\n", phys, >> - &start, &end); >> + dev_err(dev, "non-direct mapping [%pr] -> [%pap-%pap] is not >> supported\n", phys, >> + &start, &end); >> return IOMMU_RESV_RESERVED; >> } > > Same feedback as @ the last version of this. > > I still think this behaviour change should have its own patch that > preceds this patch so that the logical change is clearly explained and > understood as a standalone change. > > Supporting iommu-ranges != not mapping misaligned ranges. > > Otherwise this change goes under the radar of the new functionality > addition. Ack. Will push this out as a separate patch. Regards, Vikash > > --- > bod ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-05 13:41 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-11-03 15:29 [PATCH v6 0/2] of_iommu: add support for "iommu-ranges" Vikash Garodia 2026-11-03 15:29 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] iommu: use resource_size_t for reserved region length Vikash Garodia 2026-11-03 15:29 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] of: Add support for "iommu-ranges" on a device node Vikash Garodia 2026-11-04 16:03 ` Rob Herring 2026-11-05 13:39 ` Vikash Garodia 2026-11-04 16:23 ` Bryan O'Donoghue 2026-11-05 13:41 ` Vikash Garodia
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®