[tip: irq/core] tasklets: Replace spin wait in tasklet_kill()

["tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>]

The following commit has been merged into the irq/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     697d8c63c4a2991a22a896a5e6adcdbb28fefe56
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/697d8c63c4a2991a22a896a5e6adcdbb28fefe56
Author:        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
AuthorDate:    Tue, 09 Mar 2021 09:42:09 +01:00
Committer:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitterDate: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 16:33:57 +01:00

tasklets: Replace spin wait in tasklet_kill()

tasklet_kill() spin waits for TASKLET_STATE_SCHED to be cleared invoking
yield() from inside the loop. yield() is an ill defined mechanism and the
result might still be wasting CPU cycles in a tight loop which is
especially painful in a guest when the CPU running the tasklet is scheduled
out.

tasklet_kill() is used in teardown paths and not performance critical at
all. Replace the spin wait with wait_var_event().

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210309084241.890532921@linutronix.de

---
 kernel/softirq.c | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index ef6429a..ba89ca7 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -532,10 +532,12 @@ void __tasklet_hi_schedule(struct tasklet_struct *t)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__tasklet_hi_schedule);
 
-static bool tasklet_should_run(struct tasklet_struct *t)
+static bool tasklet_clear_sched(struct tasklet_struct *t)
 {
-	if (test_and_clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state))
+	if (test_and_clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state)) {
+		wake_up_var(&t->state);
 		return true;
+	}
 
 	WARN_ONCE(1, "tasklet SCHED state not set: %s %pS\n",
 		  t->use_callback ? "callback" : "func",
@@ -563,7 +565,7 @@ static void tasklet_action_common(struct softirq_action *a,
 
 		if (tasklet_trylock(t)) {
 			if (!atomic_read(&t->count)) {
-				if (tasklet_should_run(t)) {
+				if (tasklet_clear_sched(t)) {
 					if (t->use_callback)
 						t->callback(t);
 					else
@@ -623,13 +625,11 @@ void tasklet_kill(struct tasklet_struct *t)
 	if (in_interrupt())
 		pr_notice("Attempt to kill tasklet from interrupt\n");
 
-	while (test_and_set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state)) {
-		do {
-			yield();
-		} while (test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state));
-	}
+	while (test_and_set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state))
+		wait_var_event(&t->state, !test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state));
+
 	tasklet_unlock_wait(t);
-	clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state);
+	tasklet_clear_sched(t);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(tasklet_kill);