From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
<martin.petersen@oracle.com>, <hare@suse.de>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] fas216: kill scmd->tag
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 17:07:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1631696835-136198-2-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1631696835-136198-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com>
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
The driver is attempting to allocated a tag internally, which is
is no-go with blk-mq. Switch the driver to use the request tag and
kill usage of scmd->tag and scmd->device->current_tag.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
jpg: Change to use scsi_cmd_to_rq()
Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
---
drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c | 31 ++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c b/drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c
index 9c4458a99025..cf71ef488e36 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c
@@ -77,7 +77,6 @@
* I was thinking that this was a good chip until I found this restriction ;(
*/
#define SCSI2_SYNC
-#undef SCSI2_TAG
#undef DEBUG_CONNECT
#undef DEBUG_MESSAGES
@@ -990,7 +989,7 @@ fas216_reselected_intr(FAS216_Info *info)
info->scsi.disconnectable = 0;
if (info->SCpnt->device->id == target &&
info->SCpnt->device->lun == lun &&
- info->SCpnt->tag == tag) {
+ scsi_cmd_to_rq(info->SCpnt)->tag == tag) {
fas216_log(info, LOG_CONNECT, "reconnected previously executing command");
} else {
queue_add_cmd_tail(&info->queues.disconnected, info->SCpnt);
@@ -1791,8 +1790,9 @@ static void fas216_start_command(FAS216_Info *info, struct scsi_cmnd *SCpnt)
/*
* add tag message if required
*/
- if (SCpnt->tag)
- msgqueue_addmsg(&info->scsi.msgs, 2, SIMPLE_QUEUE_TAG, SCpnt->tag);
+ if (SCpnt->device->simple_tags)
+ msgqueue_addmsg(&info->scsi.msgs, 2, SIMPLE_QUEUE_TAG,
+ scsi_cmd_to_rq(SCpnt)->tag);
do {
#ifdef SCSI2_SYNC
@@ -1815,20 +1815,8 @@ static void fas216_start_command(FAS216_Info *info, struct scsi_cmnd *SCpnt)
static void fas216_allocate_tag(FAS216_Info *info, struct scsi_cmnd *SCpnt)
{
-#ifdef SCSI2_TAG
- /*
- * tagged queuing - allocate a new tag to this command
- */
- if (SCpnt->device->simple_tags && SCpnt->cmnd[0] != REQUEST_SENSE &&
- SCpnt->cmnd[0] != INQUIRY) {
- SCpnt->device->current_tag += 1;
- if (SCpnt->device->current_tag == 0)
- SCpnt->device->current_tag = 1;
- SCpnt->tag = SCpnt->device->current_tag;
- } else
-#endif
- set_bit(SCpnt->device->id * 8 +
- (u8)(SCpnt->device->lun & 0x7), info->busyluns);
+ set_bit(SCpnt->device->id * 8 +
+ (u8)(SCpnt->device->lun & 0x7), info->busyluns);
info->stats.removes += 1;
switch (SCpnt->cmnd[0]) {
@@ -2117,7 +2105,6 @@ fas216_std_done(FAS216_Info *info, struct scsi_cmnd *SCpnt, unsigned int result)
init_SCp(SCpnt);
SCpnt->SCp.Message = 0;
SCpnt->SCp.Status = 0;
- SCpnt->tag = 0;
SCpnt->host_scribble = (void *)fas216_rq_sns_done;
/*
@@ -2223,7 +2210,6 @@ static int fas216_queue_command_lck(struct scsi_cmnd *SCpnt,
init_SCp(SCpnt);
info->stats.queues += 1;
- SCpnt->tag = 0;
spin_lock(&info->host_lock);
@@ -3003,9 +2989,8 @@ void fas216_print_devices(FAS216_Info *info, struct seq_file *m)
dev = &info->device[scd->id];
seq_printf(m, " %d/%llu ", scd->id, scd->lun);
if (scd->tagged_supported)
- seq_printf(m, "%3sabled(%3d) ",
- scd->simple_tags ? "en" : "dis",
- scd->current_tag);
+ seq_printf(m, "%3sabled ",
+ scd->simple_tags ? "en" : "dis");
else
seq_puts(m, "unsupported ");
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-15 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-15 9:07 [PATCH v2 0/3] scsi: remove last references to scsi_cmnd.tag John Garry
2021-09-15 9:07 ` John Garry [this message]
2021-09-15 9:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] acornscsi: remove tagged queuing vestiges John Garry
2021-09-30 7:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-30 8:17 ` John Garry
2021-10-12 23:45 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-09-15 9:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] scsi: remove 'current_tag' John Garry
2021-09-16 2:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-09-22 4:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] scsi: remove last references to scsi_cmnd.tag Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1631696835-136198-2-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com \
--to=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®