From: Michael Meyer <mike65134@yahoo.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: performance differences: "maxcpus=1" vs. "echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:47:50 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16336.23884.qm@web25814.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> (raw)
Hi,
what is the difference between booting a dual core
machine with "maxcpus=1" or by deactivating the second
core at run time with "echo 0 >
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"?
I observed a funny behaviour of apache ant: although
it uses javac which is single threaded, a compile run
with "maxcpus=1" is actually faster than a compile run
with both cores activated. But with the second core
deactivated using "echo 0 >
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online" it is even slower
than with both cores.
Is here any method to get the exact same behaviour of
"maxcpus=1" with disabling the second core only
temporarily? So that the second core could be disabled
before the ant execution and enabled after the ant
execution?
Thanks a lot!
E-Mails jetzt auf Ihrem Handy.
www.yahoo.de/go
next reply other threads:[~2008-03-25 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-25 13:47 Michael Meyer [this message]
2008-03-25 14:08 ` Luciano Rocha
2008-03-25 16:38 ` Michael Meyer
2008-03-25 17:16 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-25 17:23 ` Michael Meyer
2008-03-25 17:49 ` Wander Winkelhorst
2008-03-25 17:56 ` Michael Meyer
2008-03-25 17:57 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-25 23:27 ` Len Brown
2008-03-26 7:26 ` Michael Meyer
2008-03-28 14:00 ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-28 13:59 ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-29 20:55 ` Michael Meyer
2008-03-29 21:22 ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-29 22:16 ` Michael Meyer
2008-04-02 11:31 ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-29 23:22 ` Bernd Eckenfels
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16336.23884.qm@web25814.mail.ukl.yahoo.com \
--to=mike65134@yahoo.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®