mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Meyer <mike65134@yahoo.de>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: performance differences: "maxcpus=1" vs. "echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:23:41 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57127.43039.qm@web25812.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87abkmhgg0.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>


--- Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> schrieb:

> Luciano Rocha <luciano@eurotux.com> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:47:50PM +0100, Michael
> Meyer wrote:
> > > Hi, 
> > > 
> > > what is the difference between booting a dual
> core
> > > machine with "maxcpus=1" or by deactivating the
> second
> > > core at run time with "echo 0 >
> > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"?
> > 
> > maxcpus=1 should turn off the SMP alternative and
> switch to UP only,
> > optimising some locks and instructions.
> 
> CPU hot unplug will do the same. But it is unlikely
> it accounts
> for that much performance difference.
> 
> If he used maxcpus=0 it would make sense. maxcpus=0
> disables
> the IO-APIC which likely makes a large difference.
> But it should
> be actually slower.
> 
> There should be actually no difference in theory
> between max_cpus=1
> and hot unplug to one CPU. Might be some bug.

I had the following time values:

maxcpus=1:
real	0m1.642s
user	0m1.528s
sys	0m0.068s

maxcpus=2 and 
echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online:
real	0m2.579s
user	0m4.096s
sys	0m0.160s

maxcpus=2 and
echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online:
real	0m3.757s
user	0m3.632s
sys	0m0.112s







      Lesen Sie Ihre E-Mails jetzt einfach von unterwegs.
www.yahoo.de/go


  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-25 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-25 13:47 Michael Meyer
2008-03-25 14:08 ` Luciano Rocha
2008-03-25 16:38   ` Michael Meyer
2008-03-25 17:16   ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-25 17:23     ` Michael Meyer [this message]
2008-03-25 17:49       ` Wander Winkelhorst
2008-03-25 17:56         ` Michael Meyer
2008-03-25 17:57         ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-25 23:27       ` Len Brown
2008-03-26  7:26         ` Michael Meyer
2008-03-28 14:00     ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-28 13:59 ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-29 20:55   ` Michael Meyer
2008-03-29 21:22     ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-29 22:16       ` Michael Meyer
2008-04-02 11:31         ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-29 23:22 ` Bernd Eckenfels

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57127.43039.qm@web25812.mail.ukl.yahoo.com \
    --to=mike65134@yahoo.de \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®