From: "tip-bot2 for Yu Liao" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@huawei.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: timers/urgent] timekeeping: Really make sure wall_to_monotonic isn't positive
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 22:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <163977936091.23020.4635277365571231741.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211213135727.1656662-1-liaoyu15@huawei.com>
The following commit has been merged into the timers/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 4e8c11b6b3f0b6a283e898344f154641eda94266
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/4e8c11b6b3f0b6a283e898344f154641eda94266
Author: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@huawei.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 21:57:27 +08:00
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitterDate: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 23:06:22 +01:00
timekeeping: Really make sure wall_to_monotonic isn't positive
Even after commit e1d7ba873555 ("time: Always make sure wall_to_monotonic
isn't positive") it is still possible to make wall_to_monotonic positive
by running the following code:
int main(void)
{
struct timespec time;
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &time);
time.tv_nsec = 0;
clock_settime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &time);
return 0;
}
The reason is that the second parameter of timespec64_compare(), ts_delta,
may be unnormalized because the delta is calculated with an open coded
substraction which causes the comparison of tv_sec to yield the wrong
result:
wall_to_monotonic = { .tv_sec = -10, .tv_nsec = 900000000 }
ts_delta = { .tv_sec = -9, .tv_nsec = -900000000 }
That makes timespec64_compare() claim that wall_to_monotonic < ts_delta,
but actually the result should be wall_to_monotonic > ts_delta.
After normalization, the result of timespec64_compare() is correct because
the tv_sec comparison is not longer misleading:
wall_to_monotonic = { .tv_sec = -10, .tv_nsec = 900000000 }
ts_delta = { .tv_sec = -10, .tv_nsec = 100000000 }
Use timespec64_sub() to ensure that ts_delta is normalized, which fixes the
issue.
Fixes: e1d7ba873555 ("time: Always make sure wall_to_monotonic isn't positive")
Signed-off-by: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211213135727.1656662-1-liaoyu15@huawei.com
---
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index b348749..dcdcb85 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -1306,8 +1306,7 @@ int do_settimeofday64(const struct timespec64 *ts)
timekeeping_forward_now(tk);
xt = tk_xtime(tk);
- ts_delta.tv_sec = ts->tv_sec - xt.tv_sec;
- ts_delta.tv_nsec = ts->tv_nsec - xt.tv_nsec;
+ ts_delta = timespec64_sub(*ts, xt);
if (timespec64_compare(&tk->wall_to_monotonic, &ts_delta) > 0) {
ret = -EINVAL;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-17 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-13 13:57 [PATCH v2] timekeeping: Make " Yu Liao
2021-12-17 22:16 ` tip-bot2 for Yu Liao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=163977936091.23020.4635277365571231741.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=liaoyu15@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®