* [PATCH v2] timekeeping: Make sure wall_to_monotonic isn't positive
@ 2021-12-13 13:57 Yu Liao
2021-12-17 22:16 ` [tip: timers/urgent] timekeeping: Really make " tip-bot2 for Yu Liao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Yu Liao @ 2021-12-13 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: john.stultz; +Cc: tglx, linux-kernel, liwei391, liaoyu15
After commit e1d7ba873555 ("time: Always make sure wall_to_monotonic
isn't positive"), we can still change wall_to_monotonic to positive
by running the following code:
int main(void)
{
struct timespec time;
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &time);
time.tv_nsec = 0;
clock_settime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &time);
return 0;
}
The reason is that the parameters of timespec64_compare() may be
unnormalized, and timespec64_compare() simply compare tv_sec,
for example:
wall_to_monotonic = {tv_sec = -10, tv_nsec = 900000000}
ts_delta = {tv_sec = -9, tv_nsec = -900000000}
timespec64_compare() result is wall_to_monotonic < ts_delta, but
actually wall_to_monotonic > ts_delta. After normalized, the result
of timespec64_compare() is correct:
wall_to_monotonic = {tv_sec = -10, tv_nsec = 900000000}
ts_delta = {tv_sec = -10, tv_nsec = 100000000}
Use timespec64_sub() to ensure ts_delta normalized, and the code
looks more concise.
Signed-off-by: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@huawei.com>
---
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index b348749a9fc6..dcdcb85121e4 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -1306,8 +1306,7 @@ int do_settimeofday64(const struct timespec64 *ts)
timekeeping_forward_now(tk);
xt = tk_xtime(tk);
- ts_delta.tv_sec = ts->tv_sec - xt.tv_sec;
- ts_delta.tv_nsec = ts->tv_nsec - xt.tv_nsec;
+ ts_delta = timespec64_sub(*ts, xt);
if (timespec64_compare(&tk->wall_to_monotonic, &ts_delta) > 0) {
ret = -EINVAL;
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [tip: timers/urgent] timekeeping: Really make sure wall_to_monotonic isn't positive
2021-12-13 13:57 [PATCH v2] timekeeping: Make sure wall_to_monotonic isn't positive Yu Liao
@ 2021-12-17 22:16 ` tip-bot2 for Yu Liao
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot2 for Yu Liao @ 2021-12-17 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits; +Cc: Yu Liao, Thomas Gleixner, stable, x86, linux-kernel
The following commit has been merged into the timers/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 4e8c11b6b3f0b6a283e898344f154641eda94266
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/4e8c11b6b3f0b6a283e898344f154641eda94266
Author: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@huawei.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 21:57:27 +08:00
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitterDate: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 23:06:22 +01:00
timekeeping: Really make sure wall_to_monotonic isn't positive
Even after commit e1d7ba873555 ("time: Always make sure wall_to_monotonic
isn't positive") it is still possible to make wall_to_monotonic positive
by running the following code:
int main(void)
{
struct timespec time;
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &time);
time.tv_nsec = 0;
clock_settime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &time);
return 0;
}
The reason is that the second parameter of timespec64_compare(), ts_delta,
may be unnormalized because the delta is calculated with an open coded
substraction which causes the comparison of tv_sec to yield the wrong
result:
wall_to_monotonic = { .tv_sec = -10, .tv_nsec = 900000000 }
ts_delta = { .tv_sec = -9, .tv_nsec = -900000000 }
That makes timespec64_compare() claim that wall_to_monotonic < ts_delta,
but actually the result should be wall_to_monotonic > ts_delta.
After normalization, the result of timespec64_compare() is correct because
the tv_sec comparison is not longer misleading:
wall_to_monotonic = { .tv_sec = -10, .tv_nsec = 900000000 }
ts_delta = { .tv_sec = -10, .tv_nsec = 100000000 }
Use timespec64_sub() to ensure that ts_delta is normalized, which fixes the
issue.
Fixes: e1d7ba873555 ("time: Always make sure wall_to_monotonic isn't positive")
Signed-off-by: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211213135727.1656662-1-liaoyu15@huawei.com
---
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index b348749..dcdcb85 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -1306,8 +1306,7 @@ int do_settimeofday64(const struct timespec64 *ts)
timekeeping_forward_now(tk);
xt = tk_xtime(tk);
- ts_delta.tv_sec = ts->tv_sec - xt.tv_sec;
- ts_delta.tv_nsec = ts->tv_nsec - xt.tv_nsec;
+ ts_delta = timespec64_sub(*ts, xt);
if (timespec64_compare(&tk->wall_to_monotonic, &ts_delta) > 0) {
ret = -EINVAL;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-17 22:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-12-13 13:57 [PATCH v2] timekeeping: Make sure wall_to_monotonic isn't positive Yu Liao
2021-12-17 22:16 ` [tip: timers/urgent] timekeeping: Really make " tip-bot2 for Yu Liao
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®