From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Leonardo Bras <leo.bras@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 1/3] KVM: arm64: Avoid re-testing walk_continue
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 16:59:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1639d961-1092-4a47-8825-55c1647a115b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106161240.1345126-2-leo.bras@arm.com>
On 06/11/2026 16:12, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> __kvm_pgtable_visit() performs a bunch of calls to
> kvm_pgtable_walk_continue() to find out whether the walk can continue
> further, and if not, 'goto out', which retests the possibility of
> continuing the walk before exiting.
>
> Given that it's testing the same ret variable again, there is no reason
> the result of kvm_pgtable_walk_continue() would have changed since the
> previous check. So turn this goto into an early return, simplifying the
> code and paving the way for further rework."
Looks sensible to me.
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leo.bras@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> index b74dd5ce1efd..7a51f78b6446 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> @@ -183,32 +183,32 @@ static inline int __kvm_pgtable_visit(struct kvm_pgtable_walk_data *data,
> * Reload the page table after invoking the walker callback for leaf
> * entries or after pre-order traversal, to allow the walker to descend
> * into a newly installed or replaced table.
> */
> if (reload) {
> ctx.old = READ_ONCE(*ptep);
> table = kvm_pte_table(ctx.old, level);
> }
>
> if (!kvm_pgtable_walk_continue(data->walker, ret))
> - goto out;
> + return ret;
>
> if (!table) {
> data->addr = ALIGN_DOWN(data->addr, kvm_granule_size(level));
> data->addr += kvm_granule_size(level);
> goto out;
> }
>
> childp = (kvm_pteref_t)kvm_pte_follow(ctx.old, mm_ops);
> ret = __kvm_pgtable_walk(data, mm_ops, childp, level + 1);
> if (!kvm_pgtable_walk_continue(data->walker, ret))
> - goto out;
> + return ret;
>
> if (ctx.flags & KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_TABLE_POST)
> ret = kvm_pgtable_visitor_cb(data, &ctx, KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_TABLE_POST);
>
> out:
> if (kvm_pgtable_walk_continue(data->walker, ret))
> return 0;
>
> return ret;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-06 16:12 [PATCH RESEND v4 0/3] Optimize S2 hugepage splitting, introduce skip-level flags Leonardo Bras
2026-11-06 16:12 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 1/3] KVM: arm64: Avoid re-testing walk_continue Leonardo Bras
2026-11-06 16:59 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2026-11-09 12:37 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-11-06 16:12 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 2/3] KVM: arm64: Introduce KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SKIP_LEVEL* walk flags Leonardo Bras
2026-11-06 17:02 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-11-09 13:55 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-11-06 18:13 ` Oliver Upton
2026-11-09 14:58 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-11-06 16:12 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 3/3] KVM: arm64: Make stage2_split_walker() skip unnecessary walks Leonardo Bras
2026-11-06 16:57 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 0/3] Optimize S2 hugepage splitting, introduce skip-level flags Marc Zyngier
2026-11-09 12:36 ` Leonardo Bras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1639d961-1092-4a47-8825-55c1647a115b@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=leo.bras@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®