[PATCH] wlcore: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

[PATCH] wlcore: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

[cgel.zte]

From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>

Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/debugfs.c | 52 ++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/debugfs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/debugfs.c
index cce8d75d8b81..eb3d3f0e0b4d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/debugfs.c
@@ -52,11 +52,9 @@ void wl1271_debugfs_update_stats(struct wl1271 *wl)
 	if (unlikely(wl->state != WLCORE_STATE_ON))
 		goto out;
 
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(wl->dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(wl->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(wl->dev);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
-	}
 
 	if (!wl->plt &&
 	    time_after(jiffies, wl->stats.fw_stats_update +
@@ -108,12 +106,9 @@ static void chip_op_handler(struct wl1271 *wl, unsigned long value,
 		return;
 	}
 
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(wl->dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(wl->dev);
-
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(wl->dev);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		return;
-	}
 
 	chip_op = arg;
 	chip_op(wl);
@@ -279,11 +274,9 @@ static ssize_t dynamic_ps_timeout_write(struct file *file,
 	if (unlikely(wl->state != WLCORE_STATE_ON))
 		goto out;
 
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(wl->dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(wl->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(wl->dev);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
-	}
 
 	/* In case we're already in PSM, trigger it again to set new timeout
 	 * immediately without waiting for re-association
@@ -349,11 +342,9 @@ static ssize_t forced_ps_write(struct file *file,
 	if (unlikely(wl->state != WLCORE_STATE_ON))
 		goto out;
 
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(wl->dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(wl->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(wl->dev);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
-	}
 
 	/* In case we're already in PSM, trigger it again to switch mode
 	 * immediately without waiting for re-association
@@ -831,11 +822,9 @@ static ssize_t rx_streaming_interval_write(struct file *file,
 
 	wl->conf.rx_streaming.interval = value;
 
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(wl->dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(wl->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(wl->dev);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
-	}
 
 	wl12xx_for_each_wlvif_sta(wl, wlvif) {
 		wl1271_recalc_rx_streaming(wl, wlvif);
@@ -889,11 +878,9 @@ static ssize_t rx_streaming_always_write(struct file *file,
 
 	wl->conf.rx_streaming.always = value;
 
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(wl->dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(wl->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(wl->dev);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
-	}
 
 	wl12xx_for_each_wlvif_sta(wl, wlvif) {
 		wl1271_recalc_rx_streaming(wl, wlvif);
@@ -939,11 +926,9 @@ static ssize_t beacon_filtering_write(struct file *file,
 
 	mutex_lock(&wl->mutex);
 
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(wl->dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(wl->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(wl->dev);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
-	}
 
 	wl12xx_for_each_wlvif(wl, wlvif) {
 		ret = wl1271_acx_beacon_filter_opt(wl, wlvif, !!value);
@@ -1021,11 +1006,9 @@ static ssize_t sleep_auth_write(struct file *file,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(wl->dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(wl->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(wl->dev);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
-	}
 
 	ret = wl1271_acx_sleep_auth(wl, value);
 	if (ret < 0)
@@ -1254,9 +1237,8 @@ static ssize_t fw_logger_write(struct file *file,
 	}
 
 	mutex_lock(&wl->mutex);
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(wl->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(wl->dev);
 	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(wl->dev);
 		count = ret;
 		goto out;
 	}
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH] wlcore: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

[Kalle Valo]

cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote:

> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
> 
> Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
> for simplifing code
> 
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>

I'll rename this to:

wlcore: debugfs: use pm_runtime_resume_and_get() instead of pm_runtime_get_sync()

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20220408081205.2494512-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

Re: wlcore: debugfs: use pm_runtime_resume_and_get() instead of pm_runtime_get_sync()

[Kalle Valo]

cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote:

> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
> 
> Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
> for simplifing code
> 
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>

Patch applied to wireless-next.git, thanks.

b2268fd81c18 wlcore: debugfs: use pm_runtime_resume_and_get() instead of pm_runtime_get_sync()

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20220408081205.2494512-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches