From: "tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: perf/urgent] perf/core: Fix data race between perf_event_set_output() and perf_mmap_close()
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 11:35:22 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <165779852269.15455.12378628877885813176.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YsQ3jm2GR38SW7uD@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
The following commit has been merged into the perf/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 68e3c69803dada336893640110cb87221bb01dcf
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/68e3c69803dada336893640110cb87221bb01dcf
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
AuthorDate: Tue, 05 Jul 2022 15:07:26 +02:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 11:29:12 +02:00
perf/core: Fix data race between perf_event_set_output() and perf_mmap_close()
Yang Jihing reported a race between perf_event_set_output() and
perf_mmap_close():
CPU1 CPU2
perf_mmap_close(e2)
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&e2->rb->mmap_count)) // 1 - > 0
detach_rest = true
ioctl(e1, IOC_SET_OUTPUT, e2)
perf_event_set_output(e1, e2)
...
list_for_each_entry_rcu(e, &e2->rb->event_list, rb_entry)
ring_buffer_attach(e, NULL);
// e1 isn't yet added and
// therefore not detached
ring_buffer_attach(e1, e2->rb)
list_add_rcu(&e1->rb_entry,
&e2->rb->event_list)
After this; e1 is attached to an unmapped rb and a subsequent
perf_mmap() will loop forever more:
again:
mutex_lock(&e->mmap_mutex);
if (event->rb) {
...
if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&e->rb->mmap_count)) {
...
mutex_unlock(&e->mmap_mutex);
goto again;
}
}
The loop in perf_mmap_close() holds e2->mmap_mutex, while the attach
in perf_event_set_output() holds e1->mmap_mutex. As such there is no
serialization to avoid this race.
Change perf_event_set_output() to take both e1->mmap_mutex and
e2->mmap_mutex to alleviate that problem. Additionally, have the loop
in perf_mmap() detach the rb directly, this avoids having to wait for
the concurrent perf_mmap_close() to get around to doing it to make
progress.
Fixes: 9bb5d40cd93c ("perf: Fix mmap() accounting hole")
Reported-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YsQ3jm2GR38SW7uD@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net
---
kernel/events/core.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 80782cd..d2b3549 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -6253,10 +6253,10 @@ again:
if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&event->rb->mmap_count)) {
/*
- * Raced against perf_mmap_close() through
- * perf_event_set_output(). Try again, hope for better
- * luck.
+ * Raced against perf_mmap_close(); remove the
+ * event and try again.
*/
+ ring_buffer_attach(event, NULL);
mutex_unlock(&event->mmap_mutex);
goto again;
}
@@ -11825,14 +11825,25 @@ err_size:
goto out;
}
+static void mutex_lock_double(struct mutex *a, struct mutex *b)
+{
+ if (b < a)
+ swap(a, b);
+
+ mutex_lock(a);
+ mutex_lock_nested(b, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+}
+
static int
perf_event_set_output(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event *output_event)
{
struct perf_buffer *rb = NULL;
int ret = -EINVAL;
- if (!output_event)
+ if (!output_event) {
+ mutex_lock(&event->mmap_mutex);
goto set;
+ }
/* don't allow circular references */
if (event == output_event)
@@ -11870,8 +11881,15 @@ perf_event_set_output(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event *output_event)
event->pmu != output_event->pmu)
goto out;
+ /*
+ * Hold both mmap_mutex to serialize against perf_mmap_close(). Since
+ * output_event is already on rb->event_list, and the list iteration
+ * restarts after every removal, it is guaranteed this new event is
+ * observed *OR* if output_event is already removed, it's guaranteed we
+ * observe !rb->mmap_count.
+ */
+ mutex_lock_double(&event->mmap_mutex, &output_event->mmap_mutex);
set:
- mutex_lock(&event->mmap_mutex);
/* Can't redirect output if we've got an active mmap() */
if (atomic_read(&event->mmap_count))
goto unlock;
@@ -11881,6 +11899,12 @@ set:
rb = ring_buffer_get(output_event);
if (!rb)
goto unlock;
+
+ /* did we race against perf_mmap_close() */
+ if (!atomic_read(&rb->mmap_count)) {
+ ring_buffer_put(rb);
+ goto unlock;
+ }
}
ring_buffer_attach(event, rb);
@@ -11888,20 +11912,13 @@ set:
ret = 0;
unlock:
mutex_unlock(&event->mmap_mutex);
+ if (output_event)
+ mutex_unlock(&output_event->mmap_mutex);
out:
return ret;
}
-static void mutex_lock_double(struct mutex *a, struct mutex *b)
-{
- if (b < a)
- swap(a, b);
-
- mutex_lock(a);
- mutex_lock_nested(b, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
-}
-
static int perf_event_set_clock(struct perf_event *event, clockid_t clk_id)
{
bool nmi_safe = false;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-14 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-04 12:00 [PATCH v2] perf/core: Fix data race between perf_event_set_output and perf_mmap_close Yang Jihong
2022-07-04 15:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-05 2:07 ` Yang Jihong
2022-07-05 13:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-06 12:29 ` Yang Jihong
2022-07-09 2:00 ` Yang Jihong
2022-07-14 11:35 ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=165779852269.15455.12378628877885813176.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yangjihong1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome