mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <mingo@redhat.com>, <acme@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>, <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	<namhyung@kernel.org>, <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf/core: Fix data race between perf_event_set_output and perf_mmap_close
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2022 10:00:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ba262b0-a92f-e57d-af31-baccca765ac3@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1e28533a-33ed-cae3-0389-c68e7c52cead@huawei.com>

Hello,

On 2022/7/6 20:29, Yang Jihong wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On 2022/7/5 21:07, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 05:26:04PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 08:00:06PM +0800, Yang Jihong wrote:
>>>> Data race exists between perf_event_set_output and perf_mmap_close.
>>>> The scenario is as follows:
>>>>
>>>>                    
>>>> CPU1                                                       CPU2
>>>>                                                                      
>>>> perf_mmap_close(event2)
>>>>                                                                        
>>>> if (atomic_dec_and_test(&event2->rb->mmap_count)  // mmap_count 1 -> 0
>>>>                                                                          
>>>> detach_rest = true;
>>>> ioctl(event1, PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_OUTPUT, event2)
>>>>    perf_event_set_output(event1, event2)
>>>>                                                                        
>>>> if (!detach_rest)
>>>>                                                                          
>>>> goto out_put;
>>>>                                                                        
>>>> list_for_each_entry_rcu(event, &event2->rb->event_list, rb_entry)
>>>>                                                                          
>>>> ring_buffer_attach(event, NULL)
>>>>                                                                        
>>>> // because event1 has not been added to event2->rb->event_list,
>>>>                                                                        
>>>> // event1->rb is not set to NULL in these loops
>>>>
>>>>      ring_buffer_attach(event1, event2->rb)
>>>>        list_add_rcu(&event1->rb_entry, &event2->rb->event_list)
>>>>
>>>> The above data race causes a problem, that is, event1->rb is not 
>>>> NULL, but event1->rb->mmap_count is 0.
>>>> If the perf_mmap interface is invoked for the fd of event1, the 
>>>> kernel keeps in the perf_mmap infinite loop:
>>>>
>>>> again:
>>>>          mutex_lock(&event->mmap_mutex);
>>>>          if (event->rb) {
>>>> <SNIP>
>>>>                  if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&event->rb->mmap_count)) {
>>>>                          /*
>>>>                           * Raced against perf_mmap_close() through
>>>>                           * perf_event_set_output(). Try again, hope 
>>>> for better
>>>>                           * luck.
>>>>                           */
>>>>                          mutex_unlock(&event->mmap_mutex);
>>>>                          goto again;
>>>>                  }
>>>> <SNIP>
>>>
>>> Too tired, must look again tomorrow, little feeback below.
>>
>> With brain more awake I ended up with the below. Does that work?
I have verified that this patch can solve the problem.

Do I submit this patch? Or do you submit it?

Thanks,
Yang

> 
> Yes, I apply the patch on kernel versions 5.10 and mainline,
> and it could fixed the problem.
> 
> Tested-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
> 
> Thanks,
> Yang
> .

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-09  2:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-04 12:00 Yang Jihong
2022-07-04 15:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-05  2:07   ` Yang Jihong
2022-07-05 13:07   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-06 12:29     ` Yang Jihong
2022-07-09  2:00       ` Yang Jihong [this message]
2022-07-14 11:35     ` [tip: perf/urgent] perf/core: Fix data race between perf_event_set_output() and perf_mmap_close() tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3ba262b0-a92f-e57d-af31-baccca765ac3@huawei.com \
    --to=yangjihong1@huawei.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome