From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: mpm@selenic.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] fix netconsole hang with alt-sysrq-t
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 15:29:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16659.56343.686372.724218@segfault.boston.redhat.com> (raw)
Hi, Matt,
Here's the patch. Sorry it took me so long, been busy with other work.
Two things which need perhaps more thinking, can netpoll_poll be called
recursively (it didn't look like it to me), and do we care about the racy
nature of the netpoll_set_trap interface?
You'll notice that I reverted part of an earlier changeset which caused us
to call the hard_start_xmit function even if netif_queue_stopped returned
true. This is a bug. I preserved the second part of that patch, which was
correct.
I've also bumped the budget from 1 to 16. As I mentioned, this was a
required change for netdump.
This patch was tested on my dual hammer test system.
Comments welcome.
-Jeff
--- linux-2.6.7/include/linux/netpoll.h.orig 2004-08-06 11:14:11.735851056 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.7/include/linux/netpoll.h 2004-08-06 11:14:33.500542320 -0400
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
u16 local_port, remote_port;
unsigned char local_mac[6], remote_mac[6];
struct list_head rx_list;
+ spinlock_t poll_lock;
};
void netpoll_poll(struct netpoll *np);
--- linux-2.6.7/include/linux/netdevice.h.orig 2004-08-06 13:01:39.438651240 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.7/include/linux/netdevice.h 2004-08-06 13:01:41.414350888 -0400
@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@
unsigned char *haddr);
int (*neigh_setup)(struct net_device *dev, struct neigh_parms *);
int (*accept_fastpath)(struct net_device *, struct dst_entry*);
-#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL_RX
+#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL
int netpoll_rx;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
--- linux-2.6.7/net/core/netpoll.c.orig 2004-08-06 11:13:45.230880424 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.7/net/core/netpoll.c 2004-08-06 15:15:14.154229272 -0400
@@ -61,7 +61,8 @@
void netpoll_poll(struct netpoll *np)
{
- int budget = 1;
+ int budget = 16;
+ unsigned long flags;
if(!np->dev || !netif_running(np->dev) || !np->dev->poll_controller)
return;
@@ -70,9 +71,21 @@
np->dev->poll_controller(np->dev);
/* If scheduling is stopped, tickle NAPI bits */
- if(trapped && np->dev->poll &&
- test_bit(__LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED, &np->dev->state))
- np->dev->poll(np->dev, &budget);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&np->poll_lock, flags);
+ if (np->dev->poll &&
+ test_bit(__LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED, &np->dev->state)) {
+ np->dev->netpoll_rx |= NETPOLL_RX_DROP;
+ if (trapped)
+ np->dev->poll(np->dev, &budget);
+ else {
+ trapped = 1;
+ np->dev->poll(np->dev, &budget);
+ trapped = 0;
+ }
+ np->dev->netpoll_rx &= ~NETPOLL_RX_DROP;
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&np->poll_lock, flags);
+
zap_completion_queue();
}
@@ -168,6 +181,14 @@
spin_lock(&np->dev->xmit_lock);
np->dev->xmit_lock_owner = smp_processor_id();
+ if (netif_queue_stopped(np->dev)) {
+ np->dev->xmit_lock_owner = -1;
+ spin_unlock(&np->dev->xmit_lock);
+
+ netpoll_poll(np);
+ goto repeat;
+ }
+
status = np->dev->hard_start_xmit(skb, np->dev);
np->dev->xmit_lock_owner = -1;
spin_unlock(&np->dev->xmit_lock);
@@ -587,13 +608,12 @@
}
np->dev = ndev;
+ spin_lock_init(&np->poll_lock);
if(np->rx_hook) {
unsigned long flags;
-#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL_RX
- np->dev->netpoll_rx = 1;
-#endif
+ np->dev->netpoll_rx = NETPOLL_RX_ENABLED;
spin_lock_irqsave(&rx_list_lock, flags);
list_add(&np->rx_list, &rx_list);
@@ -613,12 +633,10 @@
spin_lock_irqsave(&rx_list_lock, flags);
list_del(&np->rx_list);
-#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL_RX
- np->dev->netpoll_rx = 0;
-#endif
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rx_list_lock, flags);
}
+ np->dev->netpoll_rx = 0;
dev_put(np->dev);
np->dev = NULL;
}
@@ -628,6 +646,7 @@
return trapped;
}
+/* this interface is inherently racy. do we care? -phro */
void netpoll_set_trap(int trap)
{
trapped = trap;
--- linux-2.6.7/net/core/dev.c.orig 2004-08-06 11:13:51.237967208 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.7/net/core/dev.c 2004-08-06 13:26:28.246318072 -0400
@@ -1601,7 +1601,7 @@
struct softnet_data *queue;
unsigned long flags;
-#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL_RX
+#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL
if (skb->dev->netpoll_rx && netpoll_rx(skb)) {
kfree_skb(skb);
return NET_RX_DROP;
@@ -1805,7 +1805,7 @@
int ret = NET_RX_DROP;
unsigned short type;
-#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL_RX
+#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL
if (skb->dev->netpoll_rx && skb->dev->poll && netpoll_rx(skb)) {
kfree_skb(skb);
return NET_RX_DROP;
--- linux-2.6.7/net/Kconfig.orig 2004-08-06 13:09:21.543400640 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.7/net/Kconfig 2004-08-06 13:09:24.042020792 -0400
@@ -656,9 +656,6 @@
config NETPOLL
def_bool NETCONSOLE || KGDBOE
-config NETPOLL_RX
- def_bool KGDBOE
-
config NETPOLL_TRAP
def_bool KGDBOE
next reply other threads:[~2004-08-06 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-06 19:29 Jeff Moyer [this message]
2004-08-06 19:52 ` Matt Mackall
2004-08-06 20:01 ` Jeff Moyer
2004-08-06 20:26 ` Matt Mackall
2004-08-12 21:01 ` Jeff Moyer
2004-08-12 21:18 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2004-08-12 21:32 ` Jeff Moyer
2004-08-12 21:39 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2004-08-13 0:21 ` Matt Mackall
2004-08-13 0:29 ` Matt Mackall
2004-08-16 18:41 ` Jeff Moyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16659.56343.686372.724218@segfault.boston.redhat.com \
--to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®