* [PATCH V2] arm_pmu: Drop redundant armpmu->map_event() in armpmu_event_init()
@ 2022-12-02 1:56 Anshuman Khandual
2022-12-02 11:17 ` Will Deacon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-12-02 1:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, mark.rutland
Cc: Anshuman Khandual, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, linux-kernel
__hw_perf_event_init() already calls armpmu->map_event() callback, and also
returns its error code including -ENOENT, along with a debug callout. Hence
an additional armpmu->map_event() check for -ENOENT is redundant.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
Changes in V2:
- Rebased on arm64 (for-next/perf)
Changes in V1:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221130083350.264583-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/
drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
index 3f07df5a7e95..ed89748b1612 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
@@ -514,9 +514,6 @@ static int armpmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
if (has_branch_stack(event))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- if (armpmu->map_event(event) == -ENOENT)
- return -ENOENT;
-
return __hw_perf_event_init(event);
}
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2] arm_pmu: Drop redundant armpmu->map_event() in armpmu_event_init()
2022-12-02 1:56 [PATCH V2] arm_pmu: Drop redundant armpmu->map_event() in armpmu_event_init() Anshuman Khandual
@ 2022-12-02 11:17 ` Will Deacon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2022-12-02 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anshuman Khandual, linux-arm-kernel, mark.rutland
Cc: catalin.marinas, kernel-team, Will Deacon, linux-kernel
On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 07:26:11 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> __hw_perf_event_init() already calls armpmu->map_event() callback, and also
> returns its error code including -ENOENT, along with a debug callout. Hence
> an additional armpmu->map_event() check for -ENOENT is redundant.
>
>
Applied to will (for-next/perf), thanks!
[1/1] arm_pmu: Drop redundant armpmu->map_event() in armpmu_event_init()
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/4361251cef46
Cheers,
--
Will
https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-12-02 11:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-12-02 1:56 [PATCH V2] arm_pmu: Drop redundant armpmu->map_event() in armpmu_event_init() Anshuman Khandual
2022-12-02 11:17 ` Will Deacon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®